Utility and safety of immediate exercise testing of low-risk patients admitted to the hospital with acute chest pain.

It is common practice to hospitalize patients with chest pain for a period of observation and to perform further diagnostic evaluation such as exercise treadmill testing (ETT) once acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been excluded. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of immediate ETT for patients admitted to the hospital with acute chest pain. One hundred and ninety non-consecutive low-risk patients admitted to the hospital from emergency department with acute chest pain underwent ETT using Bruce protocol immediately on admission to the hospital (median time 165+30 min). Fifty-seven (30%) patients had positive exercise electrocardiograms, 44 (77.2%) of whom had significant coronary narrowing by angiography. An uncomplicated anterior non-Q-wave AMI was diagnosed in one patient. One hundred and eleven (58.4%) patients had negative and 22 (11.6%) patients had non-diagnostic exercise electrocardiograms. Of these 133 patients, 86 (64.7%) were discharged immediately after ETT, 19 (14.3%) were discharged within 24 h, and 28 (21%) were discharged after 24 h of observation. There were no complications from ETT. During the 17+/-6 months follow-up no patients died, and only eight (7.2%) patients with negative ETT experienced a major cardiac event (one AMI and seven angina). In conclusion, our results suggest that immediate ETT of low-risk patients with chest pain who are at sufficient risk to be designated for hospital admission, is effective in further stratifying this group into those who can be safety discharged immediately and those who require hospitalization.

[Comparison of the echo-dobutamine-atropine test and ergometric test in the diagnosis of coronary disease]. / Confronto tra test eco-dobutamina-atropina e test ergometrico nella diagnosi di malattia coronarica.

BACKGROUND: A prospective study has been done on 46 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). They had no history of myocardial infarction (MI) and a normal basal kinetic echocardiography. This was done in order to evaluate the overall accuracy of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DAS) compare to exercise stress test (ET) for the diagnosis of CAD. METHODS: All the patients after suspension of coronary therapy, performed a casual sequence with both maximal or symptom limited exercise testing (treadmill-Bruce protocol) and DAS. The dobutamine has been given while monitoring systemic blood pressure, electrocardiography and echocardiography in steps of 10 mcg/kg/min' per 3 min' up to a maximum of 40 mcg/kg/min'. Atropine has been added (0.25-1 mg) in patients who did not reach the theoretical maximal cardiac frequency. The test is considered positive when kinetic segmental left ventricular dysfunction appeared. CAD was defined as 50% luminal area stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery at coronary angiography. RESULTS: Significant CAD was present in 27/46 patients (59%). Compared with ET, DAS had significantly higher sensitivity (59% vs 92%, p = 0.01). The different sensibility between the two tests was higher on these patients with a 1 vessel disease (40% vs 86%, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in specificity among the two tests (79% vs 84%, respectively). Differences in overall accuracy between ET and DAS were significant (67% vs 89%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that the DAS is a safe and feasible technique with high sensibility (especially in patients with single CAD) and specificity. This is a valid alternative to the traditional ET, especially for these patients unable to exercise or these who are poorly motivated to achieve a work load sufficient to make the test interpretable.