Repeatability of Quantitative Autofluorescence Imaging in a Multicenter Study Involving Patients With Recessive Stargardt Disease 1.

Purpose: This study assesses the repeatability of quantitative autofluorescence (qAF) in a multicenter setting and evaluates qAF as the end point for clinical trials in recessive Stargardt disease 1 (STGD1). Methods: A total of 102 patients with STGD1 underwent qAF imaging as part of the Stargardt Remofuscin Treatment Trial (STARTT; EudraCT No. 2018-001496-20). For 166 eyes, we obtained qAF imaging at 2 visits, with 2 recordings per visit. The qAF8 values were independently determined by the study site and a central reading center. Intra- and inter-visit reproducibility, as well as interobserver (study site versus reading center) reproducibility were obtained using intraclass correlation (ICC), one-sample t-test, and Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability. Results: The qAF repeatability was ± 26.1% for intra-visit, ± 40.5% for inter-visit, and ± 20.2% for the interobserver reproducibility measures. Intra-visit repeatability was good to excellent for all sites (ICC of 0.88-0.96). Variability between visits was higher with an overall ICC of 0.76 (0.69-0.81). We observed no significant difference in qAF values across sites between visits (7.06 ± 93.33, P = 0.238). Conclusions: Real-life test-retest variability of qAF is higher in this set of data than previously reported in single center settings. With improved operator training and by selecting the better of two recordings for evaluation, qAF serves as a useful method for assessing changes in autofluorescence signal. Translational Relevance: The qAF can be adopted as a clinical trial end point, but steps to counterbalance variability should be considered.

The STArgardt Remofuscin Treatment Trial (STARTT): design and baseline characteristics of enrolled Stargardt patients.

Background: This report describes the study design and baseline characteristics of patients with Stargardt disease (STGD1) enrolled in the STArgardt Remofuscin Treatment Trial (STARTT). Methods: In total, 87 patients with genetically confirmed STGD1 were randomized in a double-masked, placebo-controlled proof of concept trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 20 milligram oral remofuscin for 24 months. The primary outcome measure is change in mean quantitative autofluorescence value of an 8-segment ring centred on the fovea (qAF 8). Secondary efficacy variables are best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), mesopic microperimetry (mMP),  spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), reading speed on Radner reading charts, and patient-reported visual function as assessed by the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 (NEI VFQ-25) and Functional Reading Independence (FRI) Index. Results: Mean age of participants was 35±11 years with 49 (56%) female. Median qAF 8 value was 438 Units (range 210-729). Median BCVA and LLVA in decimal units were 0.50 (range 0.13-0.80) and 0.20 (range 0.06-0.63), respectively. The median of the mean retinal sensitivity with mMP was 20.4 dB (range 0.0-28.8). SD-OCT showed median central subfield retinal thickness of 142 µm (range 72-265) and median macular volume of 1.65 mm 3 (range 1.13-2.19). Compared to persons without vision impairment, both reading performance and patient-reported visual function were significantly lower (p<0.001, one sample t-test). Mean reading speed was 108±39 words/minute with logRAD-score of 0.45±0.28. Mean VFQ-25 composite score was 72±13. Mean FRI Index score 2.8±0.6. Conclusions: This trial design may serve as reference for future clinical trials as it explores the utility of qAF 8 as primary outcome measure. The baseline data represent the largest, multi-national, STGD1 cohort to date that underwent standardized qAF imaging, reading speed assessment and vision-related quality of life measures which all contribute to the characterization of STGD1. EudraCT registration: 2018-001496-20 (09/05/2019).

Identification of P2Y receptor subtypes in human muller glial cells by physiology, single cell RT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry.

PURPOSE: Retinal Müller glial cells are known to express metabotropic P2Y receptors. The present study was conducted to identify certain subtypes of P2Y receptors in human Müller cells. METHODS: The patch-clamp technique was used to measure increases of Ca(2+)-dependent K+ currents mediated by the activation of P2Y receptors in freshly isolated human Müller cells. Several P2 agonists were used. Subsequently, the cells were harvested into the patch pipette and a single cell RT-PCR was performed. Moreover, retinal tissue from organ donors was used for immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The electrophysiological data were consistent with the expression of P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptor subtypes. RT-PCR revealed that mRNA for all these subtypes was present in Müller cells. However, the incidence of P2Y2 receptor mRNA was significantly lower than that of the other subtypes. Immunoreactivity for all four subtypes was found in retinal tissue, partly colocalized with immunoreactivity for vimentin. CONCLUSIONS: The presented data obtained by different techniques revealed that human Müller cells express P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptors. The specific roles of these receptor subtypes in retinal physiology and/or pathophysiology remain to be investigated in future studies.

Distribution of metabotropic P2Y receptors in the rat retina: a single-cell RT-PCR study.

P2Y receptors are metabotropic G-protein linked purinergic receptors, which are especially widespread in the central nervous system. The purpose of the present study was to determine the distribution patterns of P2Y receptors in distinct retinal cell types in the adult retina. Retinal ganglion cells (RGC), bipolar cells (BPC) and Muller cells (MC) of adult pigmented rats were analyzed for their expression of P2Y-receptor subtypes P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 by single-cell reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (SC-RT-PCR). SC-RT-PCR resulted in a positive amplification signal for all P2Y-receptor subtype mRNAs in all cell types examined. However, subtype distribution differed among the different cell types. The percentage of cells expressing a distinct P2Y subtype was: (a) for RGCs: 80% with P2Y1, 100% with P2Y2, 30% with P2Y4 and 50% with P2Y6, (b) for BPCs: 60% with P2Y1, 40% with P2Y2, 20% with P2Y4 and 80% with P2Y6, and (c) for MCs: 60% with P2Y1, 80% with P2Y2, 60% with P2Y4 and 100% with P2Y6. Our data show that different subtypes of P2Y receptors (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4 and P2Y6) are expressed in various retinal cells and indicate that extracellular purines and pyrimidines act on RGCs, BPCs and MCs via different P2Y receptors.

Expression of P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptor subtypes in the rat retina.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the expression pattern of different types of metabotropic P2Y receptors in the adult rat retina. METHODS: Qualitative RT-PCR was used to investigate the expression profile of different P2Y receptor subtypes (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6), and in situ hybridization studies were performed to show their cellular localization within the retina. Immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the corresponding P2Y proteins (P2Y1, P2Y2, and P2Y4) and their cellular localization. Southern blot analysis and sequencing verified the identity of the P2Y PCR products. RESULTS: RT-PCR revealed the presence of P2Y1, -2, -4, and -6 mRNA in the neural retina and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid. In situ hybridization showed labeling in the retinal ganglion cell layer for all four P2Y receptor subtypes, although the intensity varied. In addition, staining for P2Y1, -4, and -6 mRNA was shown in the inner nuclear layer, but was absent for the P2Y2 receptor subtype. Immunohistochemistry showed intense staining for P2Y1, -2, and -4 in the ganglion cell layer and the outer plexiform layer. There was also a specific subtype staining in the inner plexiform layer (P2Y2, -4), the inner (P2Y1, -4) and outer (P2Y1) nuclear layers and the inner segments of the photoreceptors (P2Y1, -2). discussion. The data suggest that extracellular nucleotides may play complex roles as autocrine-paracrine mediators and may have neuromodulatory effects in the retina through metabotropic P2Y receptors.

Infants' Looking at Possible and Impossible Screen Rotations: The Role of Familiarization.

The effects of familiarization and age were examined using Baillargeon's rotating screen paradigm. In Condition A, 4-month-olds exposed to 7 180° familiarization trials looked significantly longer at the 180° test events than the 112° test events; there was a familiarity preference. In Condition B, which consisted of 12 instead of 7 180° familiarization trials, the 4-month-olds looked significantly longer at the 112° test events than the 180° test events; there was a novelty preference. In Condition C, which was similar to Condition A except that there were 112° familiarization trials, the infants showed a familiarity preference. Thus, 4-month-olds experiencing 7 familiarization trials exhibited a familiarity preference, and those experiencing 12 familiarization trials showed a novelty preference. In Condition D, 6-month-olds experienced 7 180° familiarization trials; there was no preferential looking to either familiar (180°) test events or novel (112°) test events. Therefore, looking behavior during the test trials was a function of the type of familiarization experience and age and not necessarily an inferred violation of physics.

Object Permanence in Five-and-a-Half-Month-Old Infants?

Event Set × Event Set designs were used to study the rotating screen paradigm introduced by Baillargeon, Spelke, and Wasserman (1985). In Experiment 1, 36 5 1/2-month-old infants were habituated to a screen rotating 180° with no block, a screen rotating 120° up to a block, or a screen rotating 180° up to and seemingly through a block. All infants were then tested on the same 3 events and also a screen rotating 120° with no block. The results indicate that infants are using novelty and familiarity preference to determine their looking times. To confirm this, in Experiment 2, 52 5 1/2-month-old infants were familiarized on either 3 or 7 trials to a screen rotating 180° with no block or a screen rotating 120° with no block. All infants were then tested on the same test events as in Experiment 1. Infants with fewer familiarization trials were more likely to prefer the familiar rotation event. The results of these 2 experiments indicate that infants did not use the possibility or impossibility of events but instead used familiarity or novelty relations between the habituation events and the test events to determine their looking times, and suggest that the Baillargeon et al. study should not be interpreted as indicating object permanence or solidity knowledge in young infants.