ABSTRACT
Bright quasars, powered by accretion onto billion-solar-mass black holes, already existed at the epoch of reionization, when the Universe was 0.5-1 billion years old1. How these black holes formed in such a short time is the subject of debate, particularly as they lie above the correlation between black-hole mass and galaxy dynamical mass2,3 in the local Universe. What slowed down black-hole growth, leading towards the symbiotic growth observed in the local Universe, and when this process started, has hitherto not been known, although black-hole feedback is a likely driver4. Here we report optical and near-infrared observations of a sample of quasars at redshifts 5.8 â² z â² 6.6. About half of the quasar spectra reveal broad, blueshifted absorption line troughs, tracing black-hole-driven winds with extreme outflow velocities, up to 17% of the speed of light. The fraction of quasars with such outflow winds at z â³ 5.8 is ≈2.4 times higher than at z ≈ 2-4. We infer that outflows at z â³ 5.8 inject large amounts of energy into the interstellar medium and suppress nuclear gas accretion, slowing down black-hole growth. The outflow phase may then mark the beginning of substantial black-hole feedback. The red optical colours of outflow quasars at z â³ 5.8 indeed suggest that these systems are dusty and may be caught during an initial quenching phase of obscured accretion5.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous adenosine to help differentiate the origin of tachyarrhythmias has been suggested to be beneficial. However, the benefit of this intervention to physicians with different levels of training in electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretation is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to determine whether intravenous adenosine improved the diagnostic accuracy of difficult to diagnose tachyarrhythmias when used by physicians with different levels of training in ECG interpretation. METHODS: We studied 28 consecutive patients presenting with wide and narrow complex tachyarrhythmias, in whom adenosine was given specifically for diagnostic purposes. Two groups of physicians, attending (n = 14) and housestaff (n = 10), reviewed each ECG before and after the administration of adenosine. RESULTS: For narrow complex tachyarrhythmias, neither physician group derived diagnostic benefit from the use of adenosine. However, for wide complex tachyarrhythmias, the diagnostic accuracy of the housestaff group significantly improved with the use of adenosine (pre = 54%, post = 70%, p < 0.01), while the attending physician group had no significant improvement (pre = 61%, post = 71%, p = NS). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that adenosine provides useful diagnostic information to physicians less experienced in ECG interpretation when presented with patients having wide complex tachyarrhythmias of uncertain origin.
