Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging.

Several new systems for three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging of the face have become available to assess changes following orthognathic or facial surgery. Before they can be implemented in practice, their reliability and validity must be established. Our aim, therefore, was to study the intra- and inter-system reliability and validity of 3dMD (stereophotogrammetry), Artec Eva and Artec Space Spider (both structured light scanners). Intra- and inter-system reliability, expressed in root mean square distance, was determined by scanning a mannequin's head and the faces of healthy volunteers multiple times. Validity was determined by comparing the linear measurements of the scans with the known distances of a 3D printed model. Post-processing errors were also calculated. Intra-system reliability after scanning the mannequin's head was best with the Artec Space Spider (0.04 mm Spider; 0.07 mm 3dMD; 0.08 mm Eva). The least difference in inter-system reliability after scanning the mannequin's head was between the Artec Space Spider and Artec Eva. The best intra-system reliability after scanning human subjects was with the Artec Space Spider (0.15 mm Spider; 0.20 mm Eva; 0.23 mm 3dMD). The least difference in inter-system reliability after scanning human subjects was between the Artec Eva and Artec Space Spider. The most accurate linear measurement validity occurred with the Artec Space Spider. The post-processing error was 0.01 mm for all the systems. The Artec Space Spider is the most reliable and valid scanning system.

Extracraniofacial anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: retrospective analysis of 991 patients.

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by unilateral or bilateral underdevelopment of the facial structures arising from the first and second pharyngeal arches, but extracraniofacial anomalies may also be present. This retrospective study provides an overview of the prevalence, types, and characteristics of extracraniofacial anomalies in patients with CFM. All patients diagnosed with CFM seen at four craniofacial centres were included. The patient charts were reviewed and data on patient characteristics and extracraniofacial anomalies were extracted. Of the 991 patients included, 462 (47%) had extracraniofacial anomalies. The prevalence of extracraniofacial anomalies in the various tracts was as follows: vertebral 28%, central nervous system 11%, circulatory system 21%, respiratory tract 3%, gastrointestinal tract 9%, and urogenital tract 11%. Compared to patients without extracraniofacial anomalies, those with an extracraniofacial anomaly were at higher risk of having additional extracraniofacial anomalies in other tracts. The prevalence of extracraniofacial anomalies was greater in patients with bilateral CFM, a more severe mandibular deformity, or facial nerve or soft tissue deformity. Patients with CFM should be screened for extracraniofacial anomalies by physical examination with specific attention to the circulatory, renal, and neurological tracts. Diagnostically, electrocardiography, echocardiography, spine radiography, and renal ultrasound should be performed for patients at risk of extracraniofacial anomalies.

Vertebral anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: a retrospective analysis of 991 patients.

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by an underdevelopment of the facial structures arising from the first and second branchial arches, but extracraniofacial anomalies such as vertebral anomalies may be present. This retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence and types of vertebral anomalies and the association with other extracraniofacial anomalies in patients with CFM. The charts of all patients diagnosed with CFM seen in four craniofacial centres were reviewed for the presence of vertebral anomalies, symptoms, extracraniofacial anomalies, and the OMENS classification including the Pruzansky-Kaban type of mandibular deformity. A total of 991 patients were included and 28% of the patients had vertebral anomalies. The most common vertebral anomalies included scoliosis, block vertebrae, and hemivertebrae. Only 44% of the patients with vertebral anomalies had clinical symptoms; torticollis, back or neck pain, and limited neck movement were the most frequently seen. The prevalence of vertebral anomalies was greater in patients with bilateral CFM and in patients with a more severe mandibular deformity, and/or orbit, facial nerve, and/or soft tissue involvement. Patients with vertebral anomalies had significantly more extracraniofacial anomalies than patients without vertebral anomalies. Therefore, patients with vertebral anomalies should undergo cardiac, renal, and neurological evaluation.