Effectiveness of adolescent identity treatment (AIT) versus DBT-a for the treatment of adolescent borderline personality disorder.

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is among the most severe mental health problems with long-lasting deterioration of functioning. According to a Cochrane review, evidence for methods focused on treatment for adolescent BPD patients is very limited. Aims of the study were to demonstrate the noninferiority of adolescent identity treatment (AIT) compared with dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A), and that intensive early treatment of BPD leads to significant improvement of psychosocial and personality functioning in adolescent patients. In a nonrandomized controlled trial using a noninferiority approach, we compared 37 patients treated with DBT-A with 23 patients treated with AIT. Both treatments included 25 weekly individual psychotherapy sessions and five to eight family sessions. Patients were assessed at four timepoints: baseline, posttreatment, 1- and 2-year follow-up. Primary outcome was psychosocial functioning at 1-year follow-up. We performed both intention-to-treat analyses and per-protocol analyses (completers). Baseline characteristics of both groups were not significantly different except for age and self-injurious behavior. In all, six AIT patients (26%) and 10 DBT-A patients (27%) dropped out of treatment. Both DBT-A and AIT significantly improved adolescents' psychosocial functioning (AIT: d = 1.82; DBT-A: d = 1.73) and personality functioning. BPD criteria and depression were significantly reduced by both treatments. Overall, AIT was found to be not inferior to DBT-A and even more efficient in reducing BPD criteria. Both treatments are highly effective in improving psychosocial functioning and personality functioning in adolescent BPD patients. AIT is a promising approach and not inferior to DBT-A in respect to treatment efficiency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Therapists' emotional state after sessions in which suicidality is addressed: need for improved management of suicidal tendencies in patients with borderline personality pathology.

INTRODUCTION: Patient suicidality is a frequently experienced topic for psychotherapists. Especially adolescents with borderline personality pathology (BPP) often exhibit suicidal tendencies. Previous research which examined therapists' countertransference towards suicidal patients suggested that therapists are negatively affected and distressed by them. We hypothesize that this emotional response of the therapists is related to specific sessions in which suicidality came up as a topic. Accordingly, the objective of this study consists in examining therapists' emotional state on a session level of analysis. METHODS: The sample consisted of N = 21 adolescents (age 13-19 years) with BPD or subthreshold BPD. Therapists' emotional states were measured in n = 418 sessions using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Principal component analysis was used to reduce dimensionality of the therapist response. The emotional states were compared depending on whether suicidality has been addressed in the session (SS) or not (NSS). RESULTS: Two components could be identified. Firstly, therapists were more aroused, excited, afraid, angry and uncertain after SS than after NSS. Secondly, therapists were more aroused, excited, definite and pleased after SS than after NSS. DISCUSSION: Suicidality does not always have to be a burden for therapists: Both a "distress" and an "eustress" component occur in this context from which the latter is supposed to help clinicians master a difficult situation. Since countertransference feelings are often not fully conscious, it is necessary to do research on therapists' emotional states after sessions in which suicidality is addressed. This is crucial to both prevent the therapeutic process from being endangered and preserve clinicians' mental health. Clinical implications and limitations are discussed.

Silence in the psychotherapy of adolescents with borderline personality pathology.

Silence in psychotherapy has been associated with different, sometimes opposing meanings. This study investigated silence during adolescent identity treatment in adolescent patients with borderline personality pathology. A more active therapeutic approach with less silence is advised in adolescent identity treatment. It was hypothesized that a session with more silence might be negatively perceived by adolescent patients. A total of 382 sessions that involved 21 female patients were analyzed. Silence was automatically detected from audio recordings. Diarization (segmenting an audio according to speaker identity) was performed. The patient's perception of the sessions was measured with the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. The amount of silence in the different speaker-switching patterns was not independent of one other. This finding supports the hypothesis of mutual attunement of patient and therapist concerning the amount of silence in a given session. Sessions with less silence were rated as being both smoother and better. The potential implications for clinical practice are discussed. The investigation of turn-taking and interpersonal temporal dynamics is relevant for psychotherapy research. The topic can be addressed efficiently using automated procedures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Children of Mentally Ill Parents - A High Risk Population.

The scientific and clinical interest in children with mentally ill parents increased in the last years. Those children belong to a high risk population so that prevention is urgently indicated. Due to genetic influences and partly to an impairment of the parent-child interaction because of the parent's illness there exists a higher risk for child abuse. They show a three to five time increased risk to develop mental problems which require treatment over the course of their lives. They show abnormalities in social, cognitive and emotional areas. Untreated mental disorders and associated behavioral problems in children often chronify and lead to permanent impairment of the emotional, social and also intellectual development. Early detection and treatment are indicated and of high relevance.

[Alliance Ruptures in the Psychotherapy of Adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology: Risk or Benefit?] / Alliance Ruptures in der Psychotherapie von Jugendlichen mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitspathologie: Gefahr oder Chance?

Alliance Ruptures in the Psychotherapy of Adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology: Risk or Benefit? Adolescents with subthreshold or full-blown borderline personality disorders (borderline personality pathology (BPP)) are characterized by a pronounced instability in their self-image and their interpersonal relationships. The building of a stable therapeutic relationship is considerably challenged in patients with BPP. The concept of alliance ruptures and resolutions assumes that the resolution of ongoing relationship difficulties contributes to therapeutic change. Resolutions are strategies of the therapist to address ruptures, to explore their meaning with the patient and to enhance the therapeutic collaboration between the patient and the therapist. This article illustrates the use and benefits of alliance ruptures and resolutions among adolescents with BPP treated with the manualized treatment concept Adolescent Identity Treatment (AIT). Ten patients were treated with AIT. Three out of ten patients dropped out of treatment prematurely. A total of 187 therapy sessions were analyzed using the Rupture and Resolution Rating System (3RS; Eubanks, Lubitz, Muran, Safran, 2018). Alliance ruptures and resolutions are illustrated in session transcripts of a qualitative case vignette. Quantitative analyses show that alliance ruptures occur frequently over the complete treatment course in good outcome patients. However, frequent alliance ruptures at the beginning of treatment represent a risk for premature treatment termination. The concept of alliance ruptures and resolutions may help to improve the ongoing therapeutic alliance in the treatment of adolescents with BPP.

Trajectories of alliance ruptures in the psychotherapy of adolescents with borderline personality pathology: timing, typology and significance.

Jeremy Safran and his research group suggest that rupture-repair processes are important for the therapeutic change in patients with personality disorders. In this exploratory study, we describe alliance ruptures and resolutions on a session-by-session basis in a clinical sample of adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology (BPP). Three research questions are addressed: i) Is there a typical trajectory of alliance ruptures over treatment time? ii) Which rupture and resolution markers occur frequently? iii) Which rupture markers are most significant for the therapeutic alliance? Ten patients who presented with identity diffusion and at least three Borderline Personality Disorder criteria were studied and treated with Adolescent Identity Treatment. Alliance ruptures and resolutions were coded in 187 therapy sessions according to the Rupture Resolution Rating System. Mixed-effect models were used for statistical analyses. Findings supported an inverted U-shaped trajectory of alliance ruptures across treatment time. The inspection of individual trajectories displayed that alliance ruptures emerge non-linearly with particular significant alliance ruptures appearing in phases or single peak sessions. Withdrawal rupture markers emerged more often compared to confrontation markers. However, confrontation markers inflicted a higher impact or strain on the immediate collaboration between patient and therapist compared to withdrawal markers. Clinicians should expect alliance ruptures to occur frequently in the treatment of adolescents with BPP. The findings support the theory of a dynamic therapeutic alliance characterised by a continuous negotiation between patients and therapists.

A design for process-outcome psychotherapy research in adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology.

Underage patients with Borderline Personality Pathology (BPP) are in need of specialised psychotherapeutic treatment. A handful of these treatments, including Adolescent Identity Treatment (AIT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A), have been adapted for adolescent patients. Psychotherapy research has shown that the outcome of different psychotherapeutic approaches can be very similar despite conceptual and practical differences between the theoretical models. Therefore, to understand what really works in psychotherapy, it is necessary to investigate the psychotherapeutic process and its effects on the patient. This paper presents a study design for process-outcome research, integrating (1) a classical outcome design, comparing AIT and DBT-A in a non-inferiority trial assessing changes in psychosocial functioning at 12 months after baseline as primary outcome; and (2) a process research design, addressing multiple BPP and psychotherapy relevant factors. These factors include well-studied generic variables such as the psychotherapeutic alliance, more recent approaches such as video-based identification of significant therapeutic events, as well as more experimental approaches such as psychophysiological markers measured during the therapeutic sessions. The use of repeated measures and the methodological pluralism which includes event and micro-process analyses has been recommended for psychotherapy research aiming at a better understanding of the interplay of factors at work to narrow the gap between research and practice in this field.

[AIT (Adolescent Identity Treatment) - an Integrative Treatment Model for the Treatment of Personality Disorders]. / AIT (Adolescent Identity Treatment) ­ ein integratives Therapiekonzept zur Behandlung von Persönlichkeitsstörungen.

AIT (Adolescent Identity Treatment) - an Integrative Treatment Model for the Treatment of Personality Disorders Personality disorders are patterns of maladaptive personality traits that have an impact on the individual throughout the life span. Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a very severe, but treatable mental disorder. Identity disturbance is seen as the central construct for detecting severe personality pathology - and, most notably, borderline personality disorder - in adults and adolescents. Crises in the development of identity usually resolve into a normal and consolidated identity with flexible and adaptive functioning whereas identity diffusion is viewed as a lack of integration of the concept of the self and significant others. It is seen as the basis for subsequent personality pathology, including that of borderline personality disorder. Although BPD has its onset in adolescence and emerging adulthood the diagnosis is often delayed. In most cases, specific treatment is only offered late in the course of the disorder and to relatively few individuals. Adolescent Identity Treatment (AIT) is a treatment model that focuses on identity pathology as the core characteristic of personality disorders. This model integrates specific techniques for the treatment of adolescent personality pathology on the background of object-relation theories and modified elements of Transference-Focused Psychotherapy. Moreover, psychoeducation, a behavior-oriented homeplan and intensive family work is part of AIT.

[Background and practical use of the assessment of identity development in adolescence (AIDA)]. / Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung des Assessments of Identity Development in Adolescence (AIDA).

A paradigm shift towards early detection and intervention of personality disorders in adolescence to prevent persistent and chronic suffering is currently taking place. Aside further distinct areas of impaired psychosocial integrity, disturbed identity development is seen as one core component of personality disorders. Thus, the detection of early antecedents of impaired identity development is an important step to allow for early intervention. The self-report questionnaire Assessment of Identity Development in Adolescence (AIDA) is a reliable and valid diagnostic instrument to detect disturbed identity development. This questionnaire allows for global assessment of identity and a differentiation in fundamental subdomains as well and distinguishes between identity diffusion on one side and consolidated and stable identity on the other. In clinical practice, it supports the differentiation between severely disturbed identity as the core component of personality disorders and identity crisis or stable identity development that can be found in other mental disorders.

Identity development in adolescents with mental problems.

BACKGROUND: In the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5), "Identity" is an essential diagnostic criterion for personality disorders (self-related personality functioning) in the alternative approach to the diagnosis of personality disorders in Section III of DSM-5. Integrating a broad range of established identity concepts, AIDA (Assessment of Identity Development in Adolescence) is a new questionnaire to assess pathology-related identity development in healthy and disturbed adolescents aged 12 to 18 years. Aim of the present study is to investigate differences in identity development between adolescents with different psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: Participants were 86 adolescent psychiatric in- and outpatients aged 12 to 18 years. The test set includes the questionnaire AIDA and two semi-structured psychiatric interviews (SCID-II, K-DIPS). The patients were assigned to three diagnostic groups (personality disorders, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders). Differences were analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance MANOVA. RESULTS: In line with our hypotheses, patients with personality disorders showed the highest scores in all AIDA scales with T>70. Patients with externalizing disorders showed scores in an average range compared to population norms, while patients with internalizing disorders lay in between with scores around T=60. The AIDA total score was highly significant between the groups with a remarkable effect size of f= 0.44. CONCLUSION: Impairment of identity development differs between adolescent patients with different forms of mental disorders. The AIDA questionnaire is able to discriminate between these groups. This may help to improve assessment and treatment of adolescents with severe psychiatric problems.

The role of identity in the DSM-5 classification of personality disorders.

In the revised Diagnostic and Statistical Manual DSM-5 the definition of personality disorder diagnoses has not been changed from that in the DSM-IV-TR. However, an alternative model for diagnosing personality disorders where the construct "identity" has been integrated as a central diagnostic criterion for personality disorders has been placed in section III of the manual. The alternative model's hybrid nature leads to the simultaneous use of diagnoses and the newly developed "Level of Personality Functioning-Scale" (a dimensional tool to define the severity of the disorder). Pathological personality traits are assessed in five broad domains which are divided into 25 trait facets. With this dimensional approach, the new classification system gives, both clinicians and researchers, the opportunity to describe the patient in much more detail than previously possible. The relevance of identity problems in assessing and understanding personality pathology is illustrated using the new classification system applied in two case examples of adolescents with a severe personality disorder.

Evaluación del desarrollo de la identidad en la adolescencia / Assessment of identity development in adolescence (AIDA)

La identidad se integra como un criterio central en el diagnóstico de los trastornos de la personalidad en el actual DSM V. Ante la falta de un cuestionario autoadministrado que evalúe el desarrollo de la identidad en adolescentes sanos o con trastornos, si diseñó un inventario de evaluación de la patología relacionada con el desarrollo de la identidad en la adolescencia (AIDA) y sus propiedades psicométricas en una muestra escolar y clínica. A partir del método deductivo y tomando como referencia teorías psicodinámicas y cognitivo sociales, se elaboró una tabla especial de ítems que contestaron 305 estudiantes (de 12 a 18 años) de una escuela pública y 52 niños y adolescentes pacientes psiquiátricos hospitalizados y ambulatorios con diagnóstico de trastorno de personalidad (N=20) u otros trastornos mentales (N=32). La AIDA mostró excelentes índices de fiabilidad en las escalas y subescalas. El total de la escala “difusión de la identidad” y cada una de las escalas primarias “discontinuidad” e “incoherencia” diferían significativamente entre los pacientes con trastornos de personalidad y los controles con un tamaño de efecto notable de 2,17 y una desviación estándar de 1,94. Con estos resultados, la escala AIDA puede verse como un instrumento fiable y válido para evaluar la identidad normal y alterada en los adolescentes (AU)

Identity is integrated as a central diagnostic criterion for personality disorders in the current revisión of the American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSMV). As there is no elaborated self-rating questionnaire to assess identity development in healthy and disturbed adolescents, we developed an inventory to assess pathology-relaed identity development in adolescence (AIDA) and evaluated its psychometric properties in a mixed school and clinical sample. Test construction was deductive, referring to psychodynamic as well as social-cognitive theories, and led to a special item pool that was tested in 305 students aged 12-18 attending a public school and 52 child and adolescent psychiatric inpatients and outpatients with diagnoses of personality disorders (N=20) or other mental disorders (N=32). AIDA showed excellent scale and subscale reliabilities. The AIDA total scale “Identity Diffusion” and each of the primary scales “discontinuity” and “incoherence” differed significantly between personality disordered patients and control with remarkable effect sized (d) of 2.17 and 1.94 standard deviations. Referring to these results, AIDA can be seen as a reliable and valid instrument to assess normal and disturbed identity in adolescents (AU)

Assessment of identity development and identity diffusion in adolescence - Theoretical basis and psychometric properties of the self-report questionnaire AIDA.

BACKGROUND: In the continuing revision of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V) "identity" is integrated as a central diagnostic criterion for personality disorders (self-related personality functioning). According to Kernberg, identity diffusion is one of the core elements of borderline personality organization. As there is no elaborated self-rating inventory to assess identity development in healthy and disturbed adolescents, we developed the AIDA (Assessment of Identity Development in Adolescence) questionnaire to assess this complex dimension, varying from "Identity Integration" to "Identity Diffusion", in a broad and substructured way and evaluated its psychometric properties in a mixed school and clinical sample. METHODS: Test construction was deductive, referring to psychodynamic as well as social-cognitive theories, and led to a special item pool, with consideration for clarity and ease of comprehension. Participants were 305 students aged 12-18 attending a public school and 52 adolescent psychiatric inpatients and outpatients with diagnoses of personality disorders (N = 20) or other mental disorders (N = 32). Convergent validity was evaluated by covariations with personality development (JTCI 12-18 R scales), criterion validity by differences in identity development (AIDA scales) between patients and controls. RESULTS: AIDA showed excellent total score (Diffusion: α = .94), scale (Discontinuity: α = .86; Incoherence: α = .92) and subscale (α = .73-.86) reliabilities. High levels of Discontinuity and Incoherence were associated with low levels in Self Directedness, an indicator of maladaptive personality functioning. Both AIDA scales were significantly different between PD-patients and controls with remarkable effect sizes (d) of 2.17 and 1.94 standard deviations. CONCLUSION: AIDA is a reliable and valid instrument to assess normal and disturbed identity in adolescents. Studies for further validation and for obtaining population norms are in progress and may provide insight in the relevant aspects of identity development in differentiating specific psychopathology and therapeutic focus and outcome.

[The differentiation between identity crisis and identity diffusion and its impact on treatment]. / Differenzierung zwischen Identitätskrise und Identitätsdiffusion und ihre Bedeutung für die Behandlung.

The differentiation between an identity crisis, a transient phenomenon that usually results (after resolution) in a well-integrated identity with flexible and adaptive functioning, and an identity diffusion that is viewed as a basis for subsequent personality pathology, has a major impact on the selection of a treatment method. A new treatment method (Adolescent Identity Treatment, AIT), a modification of Transference Focused Psychotherapy, was developed to treat adolescents with identity diffusion in order to improve their relationships with friends, parents, and teachers and to help them acquire positive self-esteem, clarify life goals and establish a stable identity. In a case study we describe the basic approaches of AIT in assessment and treatment.