From Qualitative Research to Quantitative Preference Elicitation: An Example in Invasive Meningococcal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is fundamental for designing discrete choice experiments (DCEs) but is often underreported in the preference literature. We developed a DCE to elicit preferences for vaccination against invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) among adolescents and young people (AYP) and parents and legal guardians (PLG) in the United States. This article reports the targeted literature review and qualitative interviews that informed the DCE design and demonstrates how to apply the recent reporting guidelines for qualitative developmental work in preference studies. METHODS: This study included two parts: a targeted literature review and qualitative interviews. The Medline and Embase databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies on IMD and immunization. The results of the targeted literature review informed a qualitative interview guide. Sixty-minute, online, semi-structured interviews with AYP and PLG were used to identify themes related to willingness to be vaccinated against IMD. Participants were recruited through a third-party recruiter's database and commercial online panels. Interviews included vignettes about IMD and vaccinations and three thresholding exercises examining the effect of incidence rate, disability rate, and fatality rate on vaccination preferences. Participant responses related to the themes were counted. RESULTS: The targeted literature review identified 31 concepts that were synthesized into six topics for the qualitative interviews. Twenty AYP aged 16-23 years and 20 PLG of adolescents aged 11-17 years were interviewed. Four themes related to willingness to be vaccinated emerged: attitudes towards vaccination, knowledge and information, perception of IMD, and vaccine attributes. Most participants were concerned about IMD (AYP 60%; PLG 85%) and had positive views of vaccination (AYP 80%; PLG 60%). Ninety percent of AYP and 75% of PLG always chose vaccination over no vaccination, independent of IMD incidence rate, disability rate, or fatality rate. CONCLUSION: Willingness to be vaccinated against IMD was affected by vaccine attributes but largely insensitive to IMD incidence and severity. This article provides an example of how to apply the recent reporting guidelines for qualitative developmental work in preference studies, with 21 out of 22 items in the guidelines being considered.

Meningococcal Disease in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Time to Prepare.

The global invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) landscape changed considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic, as evidenced by decreased incidence rates due to COVID-19 mitigation measures, such as limited social contact, physical distancing, mask wearing, and hand washing. Vaccination rates were also lower during the pandemic relative to pre-pandemic levels. Although policymakers may have shifted their focus away from IMD vaccination programs to COVID-19 vaccination programs, strong arguments support implementation and prioritization of IMD vaccination programs; IMD cases have increased in some countries and IMD rates may even have exceeded pre-pandemic levels. Additional concerns include increased susceptibility due to vaccination coverage gaps, increased incidence of other respiratory pathogens, immunity debt from lockdown restrictions, and increased IMD epidemiologic variability. The full range of benefits of widely available and effective meningococcal vaccines needs to be considered, especially in health technology assessments, where the broad benefits of these vaccines are neither accurately quantified nor captured in implementation policy decisions. Importantly, implementation of meningococcal vaccination programs in the current IMD climate also appeals to broader healthcare principles, including preparedness rather than reactive approaches, generally accepted benefit-risk approaches to vaccination, historical precedent, and the World Health Organization's goal of defeating meningitis by 2030. Countries should therefore act swiftly to bolster existing meningococcal vaccination strategies to provide broad coverage across age groups and serogroups given the recent increases in IMD incidence.

Inference of transmission dynamics and retrospective forecast of invasive meningococcal disease.

The pathogenic bacteria Neisseria meningitidis, which causes invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), predominantly colonizes humans asymptomatically; however, invasive disease occurs in a small proportion of the population. Here, we explore the seasonality of IMD and develop and validate a suite of models for simulating and forecasting disease outcomes in the United States. We combine the models into multi-model ensembles (MME) based on the past performance of the individual models, as well as a naive equally weighted aggregation, and compare the retrospective forecast performance over a six-month forecast horizon. Deployment of the complete vaccination regimen, introduced in 2011, coincided with a change in the periodicity of IMD, suggesting altered transmission dynamics. We found that a model forced with the period obtained by local power wavelet decomposition best fit and forecast observations. In addition, the MME performed the best across the entire study period. Finally, our study included US-level data until 2022, allowing study of a possible IMD rebound after relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, no evidence of a rebound was found. Our findings demonstrate the ability of process-based models to retrospectively forecast IMD and provide a first analysis of the seasonality of IMD before and after the complete vaccination regimen.

Recognizing the Broader Value of Meningococcal Vaccination: A Matter of Evidence, Ability, or Willingness?

OBJECTIVES: It is widely argued that the value of meningococcal vaccination extends beyond the narrow value elements traditionally considered in health technology assessment. Nevertheless, measuring broader value presents challenges, whereas assessment methods and outcomes vary widely. This article investigates the extent to which the broader value of meningococcal vaccination is recognized, considering the available evidence and decision maker's methodological ability and willingness. METHODS: A targeted literature review informed the classification of broader value elements according to their relevance to meningococcal vaccination and the quality of existing evidence. Focusing on relevant value elements with good evidentiary standards, decision makers' perspectives and methodological ability to consider them were assessed through case studies of health technology assessment of meningococcal B vaccination in England and The Netherlands. RESULTS: Value elements of high relevance to meningococcal vaccination with good quality evidence include caregivers' health gains, patients' lifetime productivity gains, and disease severity. The willingness and methodological ability to incorporate them into value assessments have been mixed. This is attributable to the scope of the value assessment perspective and the use of evaluation methods that do not fully capture broader value. For other broader value elements, evidence gaps are another potential barrier to value demonstration and recognition. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base confirms that the value of meningococcal vaccination spans beyond healthcare sector effects to health-related externalities, allocative value, and societal economic benefits. To ensure that the most efficient resource allocation outcomes are achieved, countries should consider how to improve their perspective and methodological ability to assess broader value elements accurately.

Did the change of the vaccination schedule effect pneumococcal conjugate vaccination compliance and adherence of premature and mature born infants in Germany? Answers from a claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: In August 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1 to a 2+1scheme. For premature infants, the 3+1schedule remained unchanged. Aim was to assess vaccination rates, completeness, and timeliness for PCV stratified by premature and mature infants before and after the recommendation change based on real-world data. METHODS: Retrospective claims data analyses were conducted using a comprehensive research database. The study population consisted of all mature and premature infants born in 2013, 2016, or 2018 with an individual follow-up of 24 months using ICD-10-GM codes P07.2 and P07.3 for premature infants. Hexavalent (HEXA) combination vaccination with a consistent 3+1recommendation for premature and mature infants was analyzed as a reference. RESULTS: After follow-up of 24 months, rates of premature and mature infants receiving ≥1PCV and HEXA vaccination steadily increased since the change of STIKO's recommendation. However, in 2018 (2016/2013), only 47 % (41 %/65 %) of premature but 74 % (72 %/68 %) of mature infants obtained the recommended 3+1 respectively 2+1 PCV doses. At the same age, a consistent increase in complete HEXA vaccination with 3+1 doses was observed over time in premature (2013/2016/2018: 66 %/68 %/70 %) and mature (2013/2016/2018: 69 %/72 %/73 %) infants. Timeliness of PCV and HEXA booster administration remained stable with âˆ¼50 % of all premature and mature infants receiving the booster according to recommended timelines. CONCLUSION: There is no proven evidence that the reduced PCV schedule for mature infants induced a higher acceptance of vaccination. The rate of unvaccinated infants remained at a considerable level and vaccinations were often delayed. Although the STIKO still recommends a 3+1 PCV schedule for premature infants in Germany, less than half of children showed a completed vaccination series. To protect these vulnerable groups, efforts are needed to increase adherence to the STIKO recommendation especially for premature infants.

Assessing the Role of Infant and Toddler MenACWY Immunisation in the UK: Does the Adolescent MenACWY Programme Provide Sufficient Protection?

A combined Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)/meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) vaccine will soon be unavailable in the UK immunisation schedule due to discontinuation by the manufacturer. An interim statement by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises stopping MenC immunisation at 12 months of age when this occurs. We undertook an analysis of the public health impact of various potential meningococcal vaccination strategies in the UK in the absence of the Hib/MenC vaccine. A static population-cohort model was developed evaluating the burden of IMD (using 2005-2015 epidemiological data) and related health outcomes (e.g., cases, cases with long-term sequelae, deaths), which allows for the comparison of any two meningococcal immunisation strategies. We compared potential strategies that included different combinations of infant and/or toddler MenACWY immunisations with the anticipated future situation in which a 12-month MenC vaccine is not used, but the MenACWY vaccine is routinely given in adolescents. The most effective strategy is combining MenACWY immunisation at 2, 4, and 12 months of age with the incumbent adolescent MenACWY immunisation programme, resulting in the prevention of an additional 269 IMD cases and 13 fatalities over the modelling period; of these cases, 87 would be associated with long-term sequelae. Among the different vaccination strategies, it was observed that those with multiple doses and earlier doses provided the greatest protection. Our study provides evidence suggesting that the removal of the MenC toddler immunisation from the UK schedule would potentially increase the risk of unnecessary IMD cases and have a detrimental public health impact if not replaced by an alternate infant and/or toddler programme. This analysis supports that infant and toddler MenACWY immunisation can provide maximal protection while complementing both infant/toddler MenB and adolescent MenACWY immunisation programmes in the UK.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Clostridioides difficile Infections in Germany: A Health Claims Data Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is increasingly recognized as a public health threat at the community level in addition to being one of the most common causes of healthcare-associated infections. In Germany, the epidemiology of CDI is primarily informed by national hospital-based CDI surveillance. We used health claims data from Germany to obtain valuable insights on population-level disease burden and risk factors for CDI. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a representative sample from the InGef research database. Overall and age- and sex-stratified CDI incidence rates were estimated for German adults from 2013 to 2017 using different case definitions (i.e., main, broad, strict), and further stratified by setting (inpatient versus outpatient). Risk factors for CDI were assessed for the 2013-2016 period. RESULTS: The CDI incidence rate was high but declined by 15.3% from 2013 [141 (95% confidence interval, CI 137-145) cases/100,000 person-years] to 2017 [120 (95% CI 116-123)]. Annual CDI incidence rates were higher in female patients and the elderly. The most important risk factors for CDI were chronic inflammatory bowel disease [odds ratio (OR) 4.7, 95% CI 4.0-5.5], chemotherapy (OR 4.7, 95% CI 4.1-5.2), chronic kidney disease (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.6-3.3), and ciprofloxacin receipt (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.8). CONCLUSIONS: Despite prevention strategies leading to declining incidence, CDI remains an important public health threat in Germany, with a high burden in the hospital setting and an outpatient epidemiology that is poorly understood. These findings, which are relevant both regionally and globally, can be used as a basis for further research on the full burden of CDI in Germany.

Evaluation of under-testing and under-diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), a viral infectious disease affecting the central nervous system, potentially resulting in prolonged neurological symptoms and other long-term sequelae. Case identification can be challenging as TBE can be associated with non-specific symptoms, and even in cases consistent with typical TBE symptoms, the rate of laboratory testing to confirm cases is unknown. This study assessed real-world TBE laboratory testing rates across Germany. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, physicians provided data on TBE decision-making, laboratory testing (serological), and diagnostics behavior via in-depth qualitative interviews (N = 12) or a web-based quantitative survey of their patient medical records (N = 166). Hospital-based physicians who specialized in infectious disease, intensive care unit, emergency room, neurology, or pediatrics with experience managing and ordering testing for patients with meningitis, encephalitis, or non-specific central nervous system symptoms in the past 12 months were included. Data were summarized via descriptive statistics. TBE testing and positivity rates were assessed for the aggregate sample of 1400 patient charts and reported by presenting symptoms, region, and tick bite exposure. RESULTS: TBE testing rates ranged from 54.0% (non-specific neurological symptoms only) to 65.6% (encephalitis symptoms only); the percentage of TBE positive results ranged from 5.3% (non-specific neurological symptoms only) to 36.9% (meningitis symptoms only). TBE testing rates were higher among those with a tick bite history and/or who presented with headache, high fever, or flu-like symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that patients with typical TBE symptoms are likely under-tested, thus likely leading to under-diagnosis in Germany. To ensure appropriate case identification, TBE testing should be consistently integrated into routine practice for all patients who present with relevant symptoms or exposure to common risk factors.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Meningococcal Vaccination Awareness, Delivery, and Coverage in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Vaccines remain a fundamental intervention for preventing illness and death. In the United States, suboptimal vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults has been observed for meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines, particularly among marginalized communities, despite current recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases to identify both drivers of, and barriers to, MenACWY and MenB vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults. A total of 34 of 46 eligible studies that presented outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status were selected for review. Results showed MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage in adolescents and young adults is impacted by racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities. Gaps also exist in insurance for, or access to, these vaccines in adolescents and young adults. Moreover, there was variability in the understanding and implementation of the shared decision-making recommendations for the MenB vaccine. Disease awareness campaigns, increased clarity in accessing all meningococcal vaccines, and further research on the relationships between measures of marginalization and its impact on vaccine coverage in adolescents and young adults are needed to reduce the incidence of severe infections.

Travelers' preferences for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantify preferences and risk tolerance for a tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A stated-preference survey instrument was administered to international travelers living in the United States to elicit preferences for a no-cost TBE vaccine when planning an international trip, conditional upon four different qualitative levels of endemic TBE risk. RESULTS: The likelihood of choosing the vaccine increased with a destination's level of endemic risk. Most respondents (94%) would choose to receive the vaccine at the highest risk level presented in the survey (i.e. when multiple TBE cases among humans are reported year after year); 6% of the sample would choose not to receive the vaccine at any risk level. Respondents who engage in outdoor activities were twice as likely as the average respondent to choose vaccination rather than opting out of vaccination, and were one-third more likely than the average respondent to choose to receive the vaccine at the lowest risk level. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were highly interested in a TBE vaccine, assuming no cost, and most were willing to be vaccinated at all qualitative TBE risk levels. Respondents who participated in outdoor activities were more likely than the average respondent to choose the vaccine.

Clinical Evidence Informing Treatment Guidelines on Repurposed Drugs for Hospitalized Patients During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: Corticosteroids, Anticoagulants, (Hydroxy)chloroquine.

INTRODUCTION: In early 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread worldwide, overwhelming hospitals with severely ill patients and posing the urgent need for clinical evidence to guide patient care. First treatment options available were repurposed drugs to fight inflammation, coagulopathy, and viral replication. A vast number of clinical studies were launched globally to test their efficacy and safety. Our analysis describes the development of global evidence on repurposed drugs, in particular corticosteroids, anticoagulants, and (hydroxy)chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients based on different study types. We track the incorporation of clinical data in international and national treatment guidelines and identify factors that characterize studies and analyses with the greatest impact on treatment recommendations. METHODS: A literature search in MEDLINE was conducted to assess the clinical evidence on treatment with corticosteroids, anticoagulants, and (hydroxy)chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the first year of the pandemic. Adoption of the evidence from this clinical data in treatment guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO), Germany, and United States (US) was evaluated over time. RESULTS: We identified 106 studies on corticosteroids, 141 studies on anticoagulants, and 115 studies on (hydroxy)chloroquine. Most studies were retrospective cohort studies; some were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and a few were platform trials. These studies were compared to studies directly and indirectly referred to in WHO (7 versions), German (5 versions), and US (21 versions) guidelines. We found that initially large, well-adjusted, mainly retrospective cohort studies and ultimately large platform trials or coordinated meta-analyses of RCTs provided best available clinical evidence supporting treatment recommendations. DISCUSSION: Particularly early in the pandemic, evidence for the efficacy and safety of repurposed drugs was of low quality, since time and scientific rigor seemed to be competing factors. Pandemic preparedness, coordinated efforts, and combined analyses were crucial to generating timely and robust clinical evidence that informed national and international treatment guidelines on corticosteroids, anticoagulants, and (hydroxy)chloroquine. Multi-arm platform trials with master protocols and coordinated meta-analyses proved particularly successful, with researchers joining forces to answer the most pressing questions as quickly as possible.

Vaccination rates and adherence in premature infants before and after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedule change for term infants - A claims database analysis in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1scheme (2, 3, 4, and 11-14 months of age) to a 2+1scheme (2, 4, and 11-14 months of age). For premature infants, the 3+1scheme remained. The aim of this study was to assess vaccination rates, completeness, and timeliness for PCV in premature infants before and after the modified recommendation. METHODS: A retrospective claims data analysis using the "Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin" Research Database was conducted. Premature infants born in 2013 and 2016 with an individual follow-up of 24 months were included. Hexavalent combination (HEXA) vaccination with a consistent 3+1recommendation for mature and premature infants was analyzed as reference vaccination. RESULTS: After 24 months, the PCV rate for at least one dose remained stable in premature newborns of 2016 compared to 2013, while the HEXA vaccination rate increased slightly. However, a significant decrease of a completed PCV schedule (4 doses) in premature infants was noted, whereas the completeness of HEXA vaccination did not change. The timeliness of PCV in premature newborns increased for the first and the booster PCV, while the timeliness of HEXA immunization did not change from 2013 to 2016. CONCLUSION: Although STIKO still recommends a 3+1PCV schedule for premature infants in Germany, premature infants were vaccinated according to the changed recommendations for mature born infants. A substantial share of premature infants remained unvaccinated, and their vaccinations were often delayed.

Vaccination rates and adherence in pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in mature born infants before and after vaccination schedule change - A claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: In August 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1 scheme to a 2+1 scheme. It was expected that a reduction of doses would be associated with a higher acceptance of the vaccination. Aim of this study was to assess vaccination rates and adherence for PCV after the change of recommendation based on real-world data. METHODS: A retrospective claims data analysis using the InGef Research Database was conducted. The study population consisted of all mature infants born in 2013 (last birth cohort completely under 3+1 recommendation) or 2016 (first birth cohort completely under 2+1 recommendation) with an individual follow-up of 24 months. Hexavalent combination vaccination (HEXA) with a consistent 3+1 recommendation was analyzed as reference. RESULTS: After follow-up of 24 months, 90.9% (91.2%) of the 2016 (2013) cohort received at least one dose of PCV. At the same age, 67.7% of the 2013 cohort received a booster dose according to the 3+1 schedule and 75.6% of the 2016 cohort received a booster dose presumably either according to the 2+1 (71.7%) or 3+1 (3.9%) schedule. Of those receiving the booster dose, only 46.3% (2016) and 45.1% (2013) received the booster dose on time as recommended. The HEXA vaccination rate increased from 88.9% (2013) to 91.6% (2016) with a full series completion in 69.1% (2013) vs 72.9% (2016). The proportion of infants receiving the booster vaccination on time rose to 50.0% in 2016 (47.8% in 2013). CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate for the PCV booster dose slightly increased, nearly a quarter of the infants born in 2016 did not receive a booster dose at all. Furthermore, vaccinations were still frequently delayed, and the rate of unvaccinated infants remained constant.

Vaccination rate and adherence of tick-borne encephalitis vaccination in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an arboviral infection of the central nervous system. As there is no causal treatment of TBE, disease prevention by vaccination is especially important. Immunization consists of a three-dose primary vaccination schedule, followed by regular booster doses. In Germany, the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch-Institute recommends TBE vaccination for all those at high risk of contracting TBE. This includes individuals living in, traveling to and/or working in risk areas, and being exposed to ticks. To our knowledge, there are currently no reliable data on TBE vaccination rates in Germany available. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study based on anonymized German health claims data was conducted to determine vaccination rates of TBE primary immunization in 2012 to 2015 by federal state, compliance with the vaccination schedule, and TBE vaccination uptake for the 2011 birth cohort. Vaccination protection rates for each federal state were simulated based on a compartmental model. RESULTS: Vaccination rates of an initiated primary immunization ranged from about 3% in the southern federal states to <1% in the northern federal states. Across all federal states, compliance with the vaccination schedule decreased with each subsequent vaccination. Slightly higher TBE vaccination uptake was determined in the 2011 birth cohort, as compared to the German school entry health examination statistics in 2017. Simulated vaccination protection rates for each federal state ranged from 10% in Hamburg to 51% in Baden-Wuerttemberg. CONCLUSIONS: While there was an overall low vaccination uptake and a discrepancy between areas of high vs. low TBE risk, this study also indicates a concerning decline in vaccination compliance. Vaccinating physicians should address the importance of adherence upon initiation of TBE vaccination.

Provision of health care services and regional diversity in Germany: insights from a Bayesian health frontier analysis with spatial dependencies.

The German health care system is among the most patient-oriented systems in Europe. Nevertheless, distinct utilisation patterns, access barriers due to socio-economic profiles, and potentials of misallocation of medical resources lead to disparities in the provision of health care services. We analyse how a possible over- and undersupply of services and the utilisation of and the access to the health care system relate to regional variations in the population's well-being. For this purpose, we employ a recent Bayesian stochastic frontier approach that allows for spatial dependence structures. Our results indicate that patient migration plays an important role in contributing to regional differences in the utilisation of the medical infrastructure. As a consequence, policy should take spatial patterns of health care utilisation into account to improve the allocation of medical resources.

Health care service provision in Europe and regional diversity: a stochastic metafrontier approach.

■■■: In the last decades, demographic change coupled with new and expensive medical innovations have put most health care systems in developed countries under financial pressure. Therefore, ensuring efficient service provision is essential for a sustainable health care system. This paper investigates the performance of regional health care services in six West European countries between 2005 and 2014. We apply a stochastic metafrontier model to capture the different conditions in the health care systems in the countries within the European Union. By means of this approach, it is possible to detect performance differences in the European health care systems subject to different conditions and technologies relative to the potential technology available. The results indicate that regional deprivation plays a key role for the efficiency of health care provision. Furthermore, a pooled model which assumes a similar technology for all countries cannot sufficiently account for differences between countries. Surprisingly, the Scandinavian regions lag behind other regions with respect to the metafrontier. JEL CLASSIFICATION: C23, D61, I12, I18, R10.

Improving health care service provision by adapting to regional diversity: An efficiency analysis for the case of Germany.

The provision of health care in Germany exhibits sizeable geographic variation with a heterogeneous allocation of medical services in rural and urban areas. Furthermore, distinct utilisation patterns and access barriers due to the socio-economic environment might cause inefficiencies in the provision of health care services. Accordingly, an improved understanding of factors governing inefficiencies in health care provision is likely to benefit an efficient spatial allocation of health care infrastructure. We analyse how socio-economic factors influence the regional distribution of (in)efficiencies in the provision of health care services by means of a stochastic frontier analysis. Our results highlight that regional deprivation relates to inefficient provision of health care services. As a consequence, policies should also consider socio-economic conditions to improve the allocation of medical services and overall health.