Distal insertion of the clavicular portion of pectoralis major muscle: anatomical study.

PURPOSE: Several descriptions of the anatomy of the pectoralis major (PM) have been published. However, the precise description of its distal humeral insertion, which is involved in traumatic tears, remains controversial. The distal tendon is classically described as being made of two layers, one anterior (ALPM) and one posterior (PLPM), which regroup at their distal edge. The clavicular head (CH) participates in the ALPM according to most authors. However, others describe a more superficial termination in a close relationship with the deltoid humeral insertion. The objective of this anatomical work is to precisely describe the anatomy of the CH and its relationship with the rest of the distal PM tendon and the distal deltoid tendon. MATERIALS: Twenty-three fresh cadaveric specimens were dissected (41 shoulders). The entire PM as well as the deltoid were exposed. Several measurements were collected to establish the relationships between the distal tendon of the CH and the PM, the deltoid and the bony landmarks. RESULTS: In all cases, the CH muscular portion sits on the ALPM but does not participate in the connective structure of the PM distal tendon. The inferolateral part of its distal end gives a thin tendinous portion that inserts lower on the humerus in conjunction with the distal tendon of the deltoid. In 24.4%, this tendon was more difficult to isolate but was always observed. CONCLUSIONS: The distal tendon of the PM only comes from the muscle fibres of its sternal head. The CH fibres do not contribute to this tendon but appear to terminate in a separate tendon fusing with the humeral insertion of the deltoid: the deltopectoral tendon. This could explain the different patterns of tears observed in clinical practice.

Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Block as Analgesia After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block (SSB) and interscalene block (ISB) as postoperative analgesia within the first 24 hours after arthroscopic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon repair. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized controlled study was performed between 2013 and 2014. The inclusion criteria were arthroscopic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon repair confirmed intraoperatively, with or without associated procedures, and informed consent. The exclusion criteria were a previously operated shoulder, repair of the subscapularis tendon, and an allergy to local anesthetics. ISB was performed under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist, whereas SSB was performed based on specific anatomic landmarks by a surgeon. The primary evaluation criterion was mean shoulder pain score during the first postoperative 24 hours assessed on a visual analog scale by the patient. The secondary criteria were complications of locoregional anesthesia, the use of analgesics in the recovery room (the first 2 hours) until postoperative day 7, and pain (visual analog scale) during the first week. Forty-four patients were needed for this noninferiority study. An institutional review board approved the study. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were randomized, and 59 met the intraoperative inclusion criteria. Six patients were excluded (1 for pneumothorax after ISB, 1 for unsuccessful SSB, and 4 for incomplete questionnaires). None of the patients were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between the SSB and ISB groups in mean pain score for the first 24 hours (P = .92) or the first 7 days (P = .05). However, there was significantly less pain in the ISB group in the recovery room (P = .01). Consumption of analgesics was comparable between the groups, but the SSB group took significantly more morphine in the recovery room. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, SSB was as effective as ISB for mean pain control within the first 24 hours but ISB was more effective in relieving pain in the recovery room after arthroscopic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic, randomized controlled study.

Osteoid osteoma mimicking Brodie's abscess in a 13-year-old girl.

Osteoid osteoma is a solitary, benign lesion of bone causing significant nocturnal pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and bone scan are commonly used in this diagnosis. A case of osteoid osteoma of the distal femur mimicking chronic osteomyelitis with Brodie's abscess is reported and discussed. Initial radiographs and MRI showed a lesion of the distal femur consistent with subacute osteomyelitis with a Brodie's abscess. Because primary malignant tumor could not be eliminated, surgical biopsy was carried out. Histological examination showed a typical nidus consistent with the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. Subacute osteomyelitis (Brodie's abscess) may be difficult to distinguish from other malignant or benign bone lesions as osteoid osteoma. CT usually is recommended as the best imaging procedure to identify the nidus and confirm the diagnosis. MRI also can be used for this purpose. Surgical biopsy remains mandatory for unclear lesions before deciding on appropriate treatment.

SHART: shoulder hyperabduction radiological test.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify laxity of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) in post-traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder with the shoulder hyperabduction radiological test (SHART) and correlate it with arthroscopic findings. METHODS: This prospective study included 21 patients undergoing arthroscopic stabilization for anteroinferior shoulder instability. The SHART test was performed as follows: a bilateral AP radiograph was performed in the supine position, and radiographs were compared. The shoulder was positioned in passive maximum abduction in neutral rotation, and neither general nor regional anesthesia was used. The angle between the axis of the humeral shaft and the line drawn between the lateral border of the scapular tubercle and the inferior edge of the glenoid fossa was measured. During arthroscopy, IGHL distension was classified into 4 stages according to the Detrisac classification. Extensive distension was considered to be the stages 3 and 4. RESULTS: The correlation between the SHART test and Detrisac staging was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.02). In the presence of a difference of more than 15° between the pathological and the contralateral shoulder on radiographs, the SHART test shows 87% of IGHL distension, Detrisac stages 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the SHART test should be added to conventional preoperative imaging tests for anterior instability.