Perspectives on sleep of people living with dementia in nursing homes: a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Disturbed sleep among people living with dementia in nursing homes is widespread and is associated with diseases and all-cause mortality. This study examined the sleep of people living with dementia from their perspectives in nursing homes and that of the nurses who care for people living with dementia. METHODS: A qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 15 people living with dementia and 15 nurses in 11 German nursing homes were enrolled in this study. Data was collected between February and August 2021 through semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Thematic analyses were performed by three independent researchers. Thematic mind maps and controversial findings were discussed with the Research Working Group of People with Dementia of the German Alzheimer Association. RESULTS: Thematic analysis identified five overarching themes from the nursing home participants regarding sleep patterns: (1) characteristics of good sleep, (2) characteristics of bad sleep, (3) personal influences of people living with dementia on sleep, (4) environmental factors on sleep, and (5) sleep strategies of people living with dementia. Analysis also identified five overarching themes from the nurses participants: (1) characteristics of good sleep, (2) characteristics of bad sleep, (3) personal influences on sleep, (4) environmental factors on sleep, and (5) interventions for sleep promotion. CONCLUSIONS: The thematic analyses demonstrated that the perspectives of people living with dementia and nurses indicate the need to give more consideration to psychosocial factors and individual aspects of sleep in clinical practice. The results could also be helpful for the development of targeted assessment instruments and complex non-pharmacological interventions to promote sleep.

Core elements and potential of nurse-led care models in residential long-term care: A scoping review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To identify and summarise core elements, resident-, staff- and process-related outcomes and challenges of nurse-led care models in residential long-term care. BACKGROUND: Due to demographic trends, the complexity of residential long-term care has increased. To address this complexity, the implementation of nurse-led care models has been recommended. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of English and German articles in CINAHL via EBSCO, MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus. Forward and backward citation tracking via reference lists and Google Scholar supplemented the search. The final update was made on 19 January 2021. To draw conclusions about the potential of nurse-led care models, evaluation studies of the described models for residents in nursing homes were included. Full texts were independently screened and assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted and summarised in tables and synthesised for analysis. The core elements of the models were described using the Sustainable intEgrated chronic care modeLs for multimorbidity: delivery, FInancing and performancE (SELFIE) framework. The review followed the PRISMA-ScR guideline. RESULTS: We included 13 studies of 12 nurse-led care models. The different models comprised many of the core elements suggested in the SELFIE framework, particularly in the components service delivery, workforce, and leadership and governance. The studies reported a broad range of resident-, staff- and process-related outcomes and challenges considered relevant to the success of the models. CONCLUSIONS: Studies evaluating nurse-led care models in nursing homes are limited and of moderate quality. This review demonstrates that nurse-led care models include many elements for care coordination and could improve resident-, staff- and process-related outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review highlights that nurse-led care models share common core elements despite their heterogeneity. It also shows that highly qualified nurses in nurse-led care models can advance nursing practice in nursing homes.

Feasibility, Interrater Reliability and Internal Consistency of the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT).

Dementia-specific environmental design has the potential to positively influence capabilities for daily living and quality of life in people with dementia living in nursing homes. To date, no reliable instrument exists for systematically assessing the adequacy of these built environments in Germany. This study aimed to test the adapted version of the Environmental Audit Tool-High Care (EAT-HC)-the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT)-with regard to its feasibility, interrater reliability and internal consistency. The G-EAT was applied as a paper-pencil version in the German setting; intraclass correlation coefficients at the subscale level ranged from 0.662 (III) to 0.869 (IV), and 42% of the items showed at least substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa ≥ 0.60). The results indicate the need to develop supplementary material in a manual that illustrates the meaning of the items and practical implications regarding dementia-specific environmental design. Furthermore, the intersectionality of built and physical environments must be considered when interpreting G-EAT results in future research and applications to residential long-term care practice.

Relationship between the severity of agitation and quality of life in residents with dementia living in German nursing homes - a secondary data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Severe agitation and its relation to single dimensions of quality of life are not well understood. The aim of this study was to gain more knowledge about severe agitation and to examine the relationships between the severity of agitation and single dimensions of quality of life among residents with dementia living in German nursing homes. METHODS: This exploratory secondary analysis included data from 1947 residents of 66 German nursing homes from the DemenzMonitor study. The construct of agitation was defined as a composite score of the items agitation/aggression, irritability/lability and disinhibition from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q); the resident was classified as severely agitated if at least one of these symptoms was rated as 'severe'. The single dimensions of quality of life were measured with the short version of the QUALIDEM instrument. To avoid selection bias, two controls with mild or no agitation were selected for each resident with severe agitation using propensity score matching. Mixed linear regression models were then generated to determine the differences in the dimensions of quality of life for the severity of agitation and the defining items. RESULTS: For four out of five dimensions of quality of life of the short version of QUALIDEM, residents with severe agitation had significantly lower values than residents without severe agitation. Converted to scale size, the greatest difference between both groups was found in the dimension social isolation with 23.0% (-2.07 (95% CI: -2.57, -1.57)). Further differences were found in the dimensions restless tense behaviour with 16.9% (-1.52 (95% CI: -2.04, -1.00)), positive affect with 14.0% (-1.68 (95% CI: -2.28, -1.09)) and social relations with 12.4% (-1.12 (95% CI: -1.54, -0.71)). CONCLUSIONS: Severe agitation is a relevant phenomenon among nursing home residents with dementia and is associated with lower values of quality of life in the dimensions social isolation, restless tense behaviour, positive affect and social relations from the QUALIDEM instrument. Therefore, more attention should be paid to severe agitation in nursing practice and research. Moreover, care strategies used to reduce severe agitation should be considered in terms of their impact on the dimensions of quality of life.