A multicenter trial evaluation of the fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products test for detection and monitoring of bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: Presently there is a lack of effective, noninvasive tests for the detection and monitoring of bladder cancer. Measurement of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products in urine has been shown to be a useful indicator of bladder carcinoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the AuraTek FDP rapid immunoassay device for the detection of urinary fibrin/ fibrinogen degradation products associated with bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted to compare AuraTek FDP with urinary cytology and hemoglobin dipstick for the detection of bladder cancer in 192 patients with a history of bladder cancer. RESULTS: AuraTek FDP was significantly more sensitive (68%) than conventional urinary cytology (34%, p < 0.001) or hemoglobin dipstick (41%, p < 0.001) in the detection of bladder tumors, particularly for low stage low grade disease. In subjects with invasive disease (T2-T4) the AuraTek FDP test had a sensitivity of 100%. Specificity of AuraTek FDP was 96% for healthy subjects, 86% in patients with urological disease other than bladder cancer and 80% for patients under surveillance for bladder cancer but with a negative cystoscopic finding at the time of assay. CONCLUSIONS: This simple, rapid (less than 7 minutes) point of care test is superior to conventional urine cytology and hemoglobin dipstick as an aid in the detection of bladder cancer.

Evaluation of two in vitro assays to screen for potential developmental toxicants.

To evaluate two in vitro assays for their ability to detect known developmental toxicants and nontoxicants, a series of 44 coded compounds were assayed by two independent laboratories using standardized protocols. The two test systems were (1) the human embryonic palatal mesenchymal cell growth inhibition assay and (2) the mouse ovarian tumor cell attachment inhibition assay. After all compounds were tested, they were decoded and ranked according to the minimum IC50 value (the millimolar concentration of compound which inhibits growth or attachment by 50% compared to the solvent control) from either test. The in vitro test result concordance with established in vivo animal and human test results was examined over a wide range of concentration levels (above which the in vitro results were called positive and below which they were considered negative). A positive response from either test was defined as a positive in vitro response. Concordance was defined as the number of correct responses divided by the number of chemicals tested. At the 1 mM level, the concordance of data from the combined in vitro assays with the in vivo data was 66% in one laboratory and 58% in the other. The maximum agreement between the combined in vitro and in vivo data was reached at the 20 mM level, where there was a 73 and 74% concordance of results in the two laboratories. At that level there was a 16 and 10% incidence of false negative results, and a 54 and 77% incidence of false positive results. A portion of these false negative compounds may require metabolic activation. The use of either assay alone was not as accurate as using a positive result from either test. Agreement of the in vitro data at the 10 mM level with available human data was 71 and 75% for each laboratory. The data indicate that the two assays are complimentary and as such the combination of these assays could be useful as a preliminary screen to establish priorities for in vivo developmental toxicity testing.