Strengthening theories of change in women's group interventions to improve learning.

Background: Supporting women's groups is increasingly seen as an important intervention strategy for advancing women's empowerment, economic outcomes, and family health in low- and middle-income countries. We argue that learning from investments in women's group platforms is often limited by the lack of a well-articulated, evaluable theory of change (ToC) developed by those designing the programmes. Methods: We first identify a simple set of steps important to specifying a ToC that is evaluable and supports learning (what could be done). We then propose a framework in which we hope social scientists can find a common starting point (reconciling what could be and is being done). The framework emphasises identifying untested assumptions around pathways for introducing and adopting new knowledge, opportunities, technologies, interventions or implementation approaches, and pathways from group participation to behaviour change. Finally, we apply this framework to a portfolio of 46 women's groups investments made by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation between 2005 and 2017 to understand the prevalence and clarity of their grantees' theories of change (some of what is done). Results: The majority of the investment documents reviewed did not make clear the embedded assumptions or hypothesised pathways from decisions to join a group, to women's group participation, to behaviour change and and whether pathways are connected or work independently. Conclusions: We use an example from an actual investment to illustrate how this framework can support accounting for assumptions in the ToC used to guide the evaluation, the testing and measuring of mechanisms assumed to be driving behaviour change and disentangling the effects of implementationfrom context. A ToC for group-based programmes should specify in what capacities the group-based model is essential to the hypothesised pathways of impact vs. its role as an efficient delivery mechanism for programmes that would potentially generate impacts even if delivered directly to individuals. In addition, without fully specifying the motivation for individuals to change behaviour in terms of their risk/return calculus and testing underlying assumptions, we miss an opportunity to better understand the pathways for how the programme influences or fails to influence individuals' health behaviours. However, fully specifying (and measuring) every link in the programme's ToC is not costless. We present suggestions for developing ToCs with testable hypotheses that foster learning about why a women's group intervention achieved or failed to achieve its intended impact.

Women's groups, covariate shocks, and resilience: An evidence synthesis of past shocks to inform a response to COVID-19.

Background: Interventions with women's groups are increasingly seen as an important strategy for advancing women's empowerment, health, and economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, with the potential to increase the resiliency of members and their communities during widespread covariate shocks, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: This evidence synthesis compiles evidence from past shocks on women's group activities and the extent to which women's groups mitigate the effects of shocks on members and communities. We reviewed 90 documents from academic databases, organizational reports, and additional gray literature, and included literature diverse in geography, type of women's group, and shock. Results: The literature suggests that covariate shocks tend to disrupt group activities and reduce group resources, but linkages to formal institutions can mitigate this impact by extending credit beyond the shock-affected resource pool. Evidence was largely supportive of women's groups providing resilience to members and communities, though findings varied according to shock severity, group purpose and structure, and outcome measures. Further, actions to support individual resilience during a shock, such as increased payment flexibility, may run counter to group resilience. The findings of the evidence synthesis are largely consistent with emerging evidence about women's groups and COVID-19 in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusions: We finalize the paper with a discussion on policy implications, including the importance of sustainable access to financial resources for women's group members; equity considerations surrounding the distribution of group benefits and burdens; and the potential for meaningful partnerships between women's groups and local governments and/or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to enhance community response amidst crises.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training in Select Rhode Island High Schools: A Descriptive Study.

Fewer than 15% of people who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrests survive, but chances of survival can be tripled with effective bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The majority of states, including Rhode Island, require high school CPR training, yet the impact of this is not well studied. A 33-question REDCap survey regarding cardiac arrest preparedness, CPR education, and barriers to CPR training was emailed to high school staff in Rhode Island. There were 62 responses; 26% reported their school taught CPR and 94% felt it was important for students to have CPR certification. Barriers included time (85%), budget (82%), and materials (79%). Over 80% felt students would not be able to perform high-quality CPR or properly use a defibrillator. Despite laws requiring CPR training and the belief by school staff of the importance of CPR training, the majority of students are not receiving CPR training. Staff report students do not have the ability to perform effective CPR or use a defibrillator.

Pediatric Transport-Specific Illness Severity Scores Predict Clinical Deterioration of Transported Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) and Transport Pediatric Early Warning Scores (T-PEWS) are transport-specific pediatric illness severity scores that are adjunct assessment tools for determining disposition of transported patients. We hypothesized that these scores would predict the risk of clinical deterioration in transported patients admitted to general pediatric wards. METHODS: Activation of a rapid response team (RRT) in the first 24 hours of admission was used as a marker of deterioration. All pediatric transports between March 2017 and February 2020 admitted via critical care transport were included. Transports to the emergency department (ED) were excluded. This retrospective chart review evaluated TRAP and T-PEWS scores at 3 points: (1) arrival of transport team at referring hospital, (2) admission to the children's hospital, and (3) RRT activation, if occurring within 24 hours of admission. RESULTS: There were 1137 team transports during this period. Three hundred ninety-nine patients transported to the ED were excluded, leaving 738 included patients; 405 (55%) admitted to the general wards and 333 (45%) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Twenty-five patients admitted to the wards (6%) had an RRT activation within 24 hours of admission. Statistical analysis used 2-sample t tests. There was a statistically significant difference in scores for ward admissions between those who had RRT activation and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Both TRAP and T-PEWS can be used to predict the risk of clinical deterioration in transported patients admitted to general wards. These scores may assist in assessing which patients admitted to the wards need closer observation.