International validation of a venous leg ulcer risk assessment tool.

OBJECTIVE: To internationally validate a tool for predicting the risk of delayed healing of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). METHOD: A 10-item tool including sociodemographic factors, venous history, ulcer and lower limb characteristics, compression and mobility items to determine the risk of delayed healing of VLUs has previously been developed and validated in Australia. This study prospectively validated this tool using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods; using the area under the curve (AUC) to quantify the discriminatory capability of the tool to analyse the international populations of the UK, Austria and New Zealand. RESULTS: The validation of the tool in the UK, Austria and New Zealand has indicated that the model has moderate discrimination and goodness-of-fit with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.82) for the total risk assessment score. CONCLUSION: The international validation of a risk assessment tool for delayed healing of VLUs will allow clinicians globally to be able to determine realistic outcomes from an early assessment and to be able to guide early tailored interventions to address the specific modifiable risk factors and thus promote timely healing.

Assessment and management of leg ulcers in the community and an outpatient clinic.

AIM: To compare the assessment and treatment of leg ulcers seen in the community and subsequently reviewed in an outpatient clinic, to the New Zealand Guidelines. METHODS: An observational study including consecutive patients presenting to vascular surgery outpatients with at least one leg ulcer. Outcomes included the clinical descriptions of ulcers, use of an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) test and compression therapy for mixed and venous ulcers. RESULTS: The study included seventy-six patients. Every ulcer had an adequate clinical description. An ABI investigation was carried out in 9.1% and 66.7% of the patients in the community and outpatient clinic, respectively. Among 31 patients with venous or mixed ulcers in the community, 7 (22.6%) were initiated on compression therapy, and 1 (3.2%) on compression bandaging. Following outpatient clinic appointments, 29 (76.3%) of the 38 patients diagnosed with venous or mixed ulcers were on compression therapy with 20 (52.6%) on compression bandaging. CONCLUSION: There are low rates of ABI measurements and initiation of compression therapy for patients with leg ulcers in the Otago regional community. This may be due to low accessibility to expertise in ABI measurements delaying initiation of compression therapy. Innovations in facilitating ABI investigation in the community and promoting the use of compression therapy are indicated.