ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: After 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a Brief Psychosocial Intervention (BPI) plus placebo, patients (aged 12-17 years) with MDD (DSM-5) who did not meet response criteria (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised [CDRS-R]; total score ≥40 plus <40% reduction and a Parent Global Assessment score >2) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8 weeks of BPI plus double-blind treatment with vortioxetine 10 mg, vortioxetine 20 mg, fluoxetine 20 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change from randomization in CDRS-R total score at week 8; the primary comparison was the average effect of 2 vortioxetine doses vs placebo. RESULTS: Of 784 patients enrolled in the lead-in, 616 were randomized. At week 8, the mean change in CDRS-R total score averaged for vortioxetine doses was -18.01 (SE = 0.98) and the mean difference vs placebo was 0.21 (P = .878; not significant). For fluoxetine, the mean change in CDRS-R total score was -21.95 and the mean difference vs placebo was -3.73 (P = .015). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥5% of patients in either vortioxetine arm and at least twice more frequently than placebo were nausea, headache, vomiting, and dizziness. CONCLUSION: Patients in all groups showed reduction in CDRS-R scores by the end of the study, with no difference between combined doses of vortioxetine and placebo. The primary endpoint was not met, thereby rendering the study negative. The overall favorable safety profile of vortioxetine in an adolescent patient population was consistent with that seen in adults. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-Dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Patients Aged 12 to 17 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02709746.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Vortioxetine , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Humans , Piperazines/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method , Sulfides/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vortioxetine/pharmacology , Vortioxetine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Temperate bacteriophages are known for their bistability, which in TP901-1 is controlled by two proteins, CI and MOR. Clear 1 repressor (CI) is hexameric and binds three palindromic operator sites via an N-terminal helix-turn-helix domain (NTD). A dimeric form, such as the truncated CI∆58 investigated here, is necessary for high-affinity binding to DNA. The crystal structure of the dimerization region (CTD1 ) is determined here, showing that it forms a pair of helical hooks. This newly determined structure is used together with the known crystal structure of the CI-NTD and small angle X-ray scattering data, to determine the solution structure of CI∆58 in complex with a palindromic operator site, showing that the two NTDs bind on opposing sides of the DNA helix.
