Individualised screening for diabetic retinopathy with proliferative retinopathy and macular oedema as separate end points.

PURPOSE: A number of algorithms have been developed to calculate screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy on the basis of individual risk factors. However, these approaches have not considered proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular oedema (DME) as separate end points and death as competing risk. METHODS: A multi-state survival model with death as competing risk was used to predict the screening interval for diabetic retinopathy based on information about all 2446 patients from a well-defined population who had started treatment for either PDR or DME during 25 years. The performance of the model was tested on the existing database and at seven screening sites on patients who had not developed a treatment requiring condition. RESULTS: Testing on the existing database showed that at a risk level of 2% the algorithm could predict a screening interval with a success rate higher than 90% and a 1.75 times average prolongation of the screening interval without failing to detect the development of verified PDR og DME. The model was limited to a diabetes duration shorter than 40 years and depended on knowledge of relevant risk factors. At the other participating screening sites the algorithm predicted shorter intervals than the screener. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithms for individualised screening for diabetic retinopathy can prolong screening intervals without losing patients who develop a vision threatening condition. The calculation of screening intervals requires access to relevant risk factors and should be developed on large data sets that reflect the population in which the algorithm should be used.

Inter-grader reliability in the Danish screening programme for diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: The Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy includes information from >200 000 patients who attends diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in Denmark. Screening of patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes is often performed by practicing ophthalmologists, while patients with type 1 and complicated type 2 diabetes attends screening at hospitals. We performed a clinical reliability study of retinal images from Danish screening facilities to explore the inter-grader agreement between the primary screening ophthalmologist and a blinded, certified grader. METHODS: Invitations to participate were sent to screening facilities across Denmark. The primary grader uploaded fundus photographs with information on estimated level of DR (International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy scale as 0 [no DR], 1-3 [mild, moderate or severe nonproliferative DR {NPDR}], or 4 [proliferative DR {PDR}]), region of screening, image style, and screening facility. Images were then regraded by a blinded, certified, secondary grader. Weighted kappa analysis was performed to evaluate agreement. RESULTS: Fundus photographs from 230 patients (458 eyes) were received from practicing ophthalmologists (52.6%) and hospital-based grading centres (47.4%) from all Danish regions. Reported levels of DR by the primary graders were 66.8%, 12.2%, 13.1%, 1.3% and 5.5% for DR levels 0-4. The overall agreement between primary and secondary graders was 93% (κ = 0.83). Based on screening facility agreement was 96% (κ = 0.89) and 90% (κ = 0.76) for practicing ophthalmologists and hospital-based graders. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, we observed a high overall inter-grader agreement and based on this, it is reasonable to assume that reported DR gradings in the screening programme in Denmark, accurately reflect the truth.

Pharmacokinetics of intravitreal 5-fluorouracil prodrugs in silicone oil: experimental studies in pigs.

PURPOSE: To examine the in vivo pharmacokinetics of intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) following tamponade with 5-FU prodrug silicone oil formulations. METHOD: Two different alkoxycarbonyl 5-FU prodrugs denoted C12 and C18 were synthesized and formulated as silicone oil suspensions. A total of 26 pigs underwent conventional three-port lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomy. Approximately 1.6 ml of the prodrug-silicone oil formulation was placed in the vitreous cavity. Operated eyes were enucleated between 20 min and 168 hours postoperatively, and analysed for their content of free 5-FU by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: With the C12 prodrug silicone oil formulation, the concentration of free 5-FU in the vitreous water phase 1 hour after surgery was 3.30 +/- 1.62 microg/ml. After 4 hours this concentration had declined to 1 microg/ml. With the C18 prodrug, the concentration of free vitreal 5-FU never reached 1 microg/ml during the 7 days these experiments lasted. A mathematical model is presented that can explain the measured data if the clearance of 5-FU from the vitreous water phase follows first order kinetics with a half-life of 20 min. CONCLUSION: These experiments, and the model analysis, suggest that the elimination half-life of 5-FU in the vitreous cavity of a vitrectomized, silicone oil-filled eye is very fast. The model analysis indicates that an alkoxycarbonyl 5-FU prodrug with a specific release rate constant of 10.7 microg/square root h cm(2) can maintain an intravitreal 5-FU concentration above 1 microg/ml for 5 days in the porcine eye.