Impact of temporal and spatial resolution on atrial feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial deformation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) has incremental prognostic value over volumetric analyses. Recently, atrial functional analyses have come to the fore. However, to date recommendations for optimal resolution parameters for accurate atrial functional analyses are still lacking. METHODS: CMR-FT was performed in 12 healthy volunteers and 9 ischemic heart failure (HF) patients. Cine sequences were acquired using different temporal (20, 30, 40 and 50 frames/cardiac cycle) and spatial resolution parameters (high 1.5 × 1.5 mm in plane and 5 mm slice thickness, standard 1.8 × 1.8 × 8 mm and low 3.0 × 3.0 × 10 mm). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were calculated. RESULTS: Increasing temporal resolution is associated with higher absolute strain and strain rate (SR) values. Significant changes in strain assessment for left atrial (LA) total strain occurred between 20 and 30 frames/cycle amounting to 2,5-4,4% in absolute changes depending on spatial resolution settings. From 30 frames/cycle onward, absolute strain values remained unchanged. Significant changes of LA strain rate assessment were observed up to the highest temporal resolution of 50 frames/cycle. Effects of spatial resolution on strain assessment were smaller. For LA total strain a general trend emerged for a mild decrease in strain values obtained comparing the lowest to the highest spatial resolution at temporal resolutions of 20, 40 and 50 frames/cycle (p = 0.006-0.046) but not at 30 frames/cycle (p = 0.140). CONCLUSION: Temporal and to a smaller extent spatial resolution affect atrial functional assessment. Consistent strain assessment requires a standard spatial resolution and a temporal resolution of 30 frames/cycle, whilst SR assessment requires even higher settings of at least 50 frames/cycle.

Left-atrial long-axis shortening allows effective quantification of atrial function and optimized risk prediction following acute myocardial infarction.

Aims: Deformation imaging enables optimized risk prediction following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, costly and time-consuming post processing has hindered widespread clinical implementation. Since manual left-ventricular long-axis strain (LV LAS) has been successfully proposed as a simple alternative for LV deformation imaging, we aimed at the validation of left-atrial (LA) LAS. Methods and results: The AIDA STEMI and TATORT-NSTEMI trials recruited 795 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 440 with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. LA LAS was assessed as the systolic distance change between the middle of a line connecting the origins of the mitral leaflets and either a perpendicular line towards the posterior atrial wall (LAS90) or a line connecting to the LA posterior portion of the greatest distance irrespective of a predefined angle (LAS). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) occurrence within 12 months. There were no significant differences between LA LAS and LAS90, both with excellent reproducibility. LA LAS correlated significantly with LA reservoir function (Es, r = 0.60, P < 0.001). Impaired LA LAS resulted in higher MACE occurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.88, P < 0.001]. LA LAS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97, P = 0.005) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS, P = 0.025) were the only independent predictors for MACE in multivariate analyses. C-statistics demonstrated incremental value of LA LAS in addition to GLS (P = 0.016) and non-inferiority compared with FT Es (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.74 vs. 0.69, P = 0.256). Conclusion: Left-atrial LAS provides fast and software-independent approximations of quantitative LA function with similar value for risk prediction compared with dedicated deformation imaging. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00712101 and NCT01612312.

Defining the optimal temporal and spatial resolution for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial deformation analyses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (CMR-FT) have incremental value in the assessment of cardiac function beyond volumetric analyses. Since guidelines do not recommend specific imaging parameters, we aimed to define optimal spatial and temporal resolutions for CMR cine images to enable reliable post-processing. METHODS: Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed in 12 healthy subjects and 9 heart failure (HF) patients. Cine images were acquired with different temporal (20, 30, 40 and 50 frames/cardiac cycle) and spatial resolutions (high in-plane 1.5 × 1.5 mm through-plane 5 mm, standard 1.8 × 1.8 x 8mm and low 3.0 × 3.0 x 10mm). CMR-FT comprised left ventricular (LV) global and segmental longitudinal/circumferential strain (GLS/GCS) and associated systolic strain rates (SR), and right ventricular (RV) GLS. RESULTS: Temporal but not spatial resolution did impact absolute strain and SR. Maximum absolute changes between lowest and highest temporal resolution were as follows: 1.8% and 0.3%/s for LV GLS and SR, 2.5% and 0.6%/s for GCS and SR as well as 1.4% for RV GLS. Changes of strain values occurred comparing 20 and 30 frames/cardiac cycle including LV and RV GLS and GCS (p < 0.001-0.046). In contrast, SR values (LV GLS/GCS SR) changed significantly comparing all successive temporal resolutions (p < 0.001-0.013). LV strain and SR reproducibility was not affected by either temporal or spatial resolution, whilst RV strain variability decreased with augmentation of temporal resolution. CONCLUSION: Temporal but not spatial resolution significantly affects strain and SR in CMR-FT deformation analyses. Strain analyses require lower temporal resolution and 30 frames/cardiac cycle offer consistent strain assessments, whilst SR measurements gain from further increases in temporal resolution.