Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Hematol Oncol ; 16(1): 79, 2023 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Third-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells (CARTs) might improve clinical outcome of patients with B cell malignancies. This is the first report on a third-generation CART dose-escalating, phase-1/2 investigator-initiated trial treating adult patients with refractory and/or relapsed (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: Thirteen patients were treated with escalating doses of CD19-directed CARTs between 1 × 106 and 50 × 106 CARTs/m2. Leukapheresis, manufacturing and administration of CARTs were performed in-house. RESULTS: For all patients, CART manufacturing was feasible. None of the patients developed any grade of Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) or a higher-grade (≥ grade III) catokine release syndrome (CRS). CART expansion and long-term CART persistence were evident in the peripheral blood (PB) of evaluable patients. At end of study on day 90 after CARTs, ten patients were evaluable for response: Eight patients (80%) achieved a complete remission (CR), including five patients (50%) with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR. Response and outcome were associated with the administered CART dose. At 1-year follow-up, median overall survival was not reached and progression-free survival (PFS) was 38%. Median PFS was reached on day 120. Lack of CD39-expression on memory-like T cells was more frequent in CART products of responders when compared to CART products of non-responders. After CART administration, higher CD8 + and γδ-T cell frequencies, a physiological pattern of immune cells and lower monocyte counts in the PB were associated with response. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, third-generation CARTs were associated with promising clinical efficacy and remarkably low procedure-specific toxicity, thereby opening new therapeutic perspectives for patients with r/r ALL. Trial registration This trial was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov as NCT03676504.


Subject(s)
Neurotoxicity Syndromes , Humans , Adult , Leukapheresis , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Antigens, CD19/therapeutic use
2.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 59(10): 601-608, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32501622

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Inactivating mutations or epigenetic deregulation of succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDH) genes are considered defining features of a subset of GIST occurring in the stomach. Based on comprehensive molecular profiling and biochemical analysis within a precision oncology program, we identified hallmarks of SDH deficiency (germline SDHB-inactivating mutation accompanied by somatic loss of heterozygosity, lack of SDHB expression, global DNA hypermethylation, and elevated succinate/fumarate ratio) in a 40-year-old woman with undifferentiated gastric spindle cell sarcoma that did not meet the diagnostic criteria for other mesenchymal tumors of the stomach, including GIST. These data reveal that the loss of SDH function can be involved in the pathogenesis of non-GIST sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract.


Subject(s)
Germ-Line Mutation , Sarcoma/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Succinate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Adult , DNA Methylation , Female , Humans , Loss of Function Mutation , Loss of Heterozygosity , Sarcoma/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Cancer ; 123(16): 3167-3175, 2017 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28378366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: When bad news about a cancer diagnosis is being delivered, patient-centered communication (PCC) has been considered important for patients' adjustment and well-being. However, few studies have explored how interpersonal skills might help cancer patients cope with anxiety and distress during bad-news encounters. METHODS: A prospective, experimental design was used to investigate the impact of the physician communication style during a bad-news encounter. Ninety-eight cancer patients and 92 unaffected subjects of both sexes were randomly assigned to view a video of a clinician delivering a first cancer diagnosis with either an enhanced patient-centered communication (E-PCC) style or a low patient-centered communication (L-PCC) style. Participants rated state anxiety and negative affect before and immediately after the video exposure, whereas trust in the physician was rated after the video exposure only. Main and interaction effects were analyzed with generalized linear models. RESULTS: Viewing the disclosure of a cancer diagnosis resulted in a substantial increase in state anxiety and negative affect among all participants. This emotional response was moderated by the physician's communication style: Participants viewing an oncologist displaying an E-PCC style were significantly less anxious than those watching an oncologist displaying an L-PCC style. They also reported significantly higher trust in the physician. CONCLUSIONS: Under a threatening, anxiety-provoking disclosure of bad news, a short sequence of empathic PCC influences subjects' psychological state, insofar that they report feeling less anxious and more trustful of the oncologist. Video exposure appears to be a valuable method for investigating the impact of a physician's communication style during critical encounters. Cancer 2017;123:3167-75. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Affect , Anxiety , Communication , Neoplasms , Patient-Centered Care , Physician-Patient Relations , Trust , Truth Disclosure , Adult , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Video Recording , Young Adult
4.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 151, 2017 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28228122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High-dose (HD) chemotherapy with melphalan and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) for treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) on an outpatient basis has been well established in the USA and Canada, whereas in Germany and Western Europe an inpatient setting is the current standard. We report on a German single-centre program to offer the procedure on an outpatient basis to selected patients. METHODS: Major requirements included: patients had to have family and/or other caregivers, had to be able to reach the hospital within 45 min and have an ECOG performance score of 0-1. Patients with severe co-morbidities were not included. RESULTS: From September 2012 until April 2016, 21 patients with MM stage IIIA were enrolled. All engrafted within the expected time range (median 14 days), and no severe adverse events occurred. 14 patients (67%) had an episode of neutropenic fever and blood cultures were positive in 4 patients (19%). Although rather liberal criteria for hospital admission were applied, 14 patients (67%) were treated entirely on an outpatient basis. CONCLUSIONS: HD chemotherapy and ABSCT on an outpatient basis is safe and feasible if it is conducted in an elaborate surveillance program. The feedback from patients was very positive, thus encouraging further expansion of the program.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Onkologie ; 36(7-8): 415-20, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23921760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prognosis and survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are dismal. Standard first-line systemic chemotherapy is anthracycline-based. Gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) is a therapeutic option in the second-line setting. Here we present the data of our single center retrospective analysis, using GD in locally advanced or metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 34 patients were identified. The majority of tumors were located in the extremities (19/34, 56%) and abdomen/retroperitoneum (10/34, 29%). Most frequent histologies included leiomyosarcoma (13/34, 38%), liposarcoma (7/34, 21%), and pleomorphic sarcoma (6/34, 18%). RESULTS: Objective response to treatment by RECIST criteria after 3 cycles was low with 6% partial responses (PR, 2/34), 65% stable disease (SD, 22/34), and 29% progressive disease (PD, 10/34). Progression-free survival at 3 and 6 months was 77 and 62%, respectively. Patients with a clinical benefit (defined as PR or SD after the 3rd treatment cycle) had a significantly prolonged median progression-free and overall survival with 8.6 months (p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) 33.1) and 22.4 months (p < 0.0001; HR 12.9), respectively. Most common toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, edema, pancytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis. CONCLUSION: Overall, we conclude that GD is an active second-line regimen in metastatic STS, with manageable side effects.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Sarcoma/secondary , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/secondary , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnosis , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...