Potential Impact of C-STAT for Prehospital Stroke Triage up to 24 Hours on a Regional Stroke System.

Background and Purpose: Thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS-LVO) may benefit patients up to 24 hour since last known normal (LKN). Prehospital tools, like the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT), are used to select hospital destination for suspected AIS-LVO patients. The objective of this study was to estimate the potential impact of the expanded thrombectomy time window on suspected AIS-LVO cases transported to the regional comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Methods: From June to November 2015, C-STAT was performed by prehospital providers following a positive prehospital Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) stroke screen in suspected stroke/TIA patients. There was no preferential triage based on C-STAT results. Final diagnoses, including the presence of AIS-LVO was ascertained via medical record review. Impact of positive C-STAT cases on CSC volumes was estimated for up to 24 hours since LKN. Results: Of 158 patients with prehospital suspicion for stroke/TIA, 105 were CPSS positive within 24 hours of onset and had complete C-STAT and clinical data available for analysis. Forty-six percent (17/37) of C-STAT + were non-strokes. C-STAT sensitivity and specificity for LVO were 71% (95% CI 36-92) and 67% (95% CI 58-80), respectively. C-STAT triage would increase transport of prehospital suspected stroke cases to the CSC by 11% (12/105) within six hours and 21% (22/105) within 24 hours. Of 37 C-STAT + patients, only 5 (13.5%) had LVO as final diagnosis. Conclusions: Preferential triage of prehospital suspected stroke patients using C-STAT would increase the number of patients transported to the CSC by 11% within six hours and an additional 10% from six to 24 hours. For every patient with LVO as final diagnosis, approximately an additional 6 non-LVO patients would be triaged to a CSC.

Prospective Prehospital Evaluation of the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A simple, easily adoptable scale with good performance characteristics is needed for EMS providers to appropriately triage suspected stroke patients to comprehensive stroke centers (CSC). Many existing tools are complex, require substantial training, or have not been prospectively validated in the prehospital setting. We describe the feasibility and effectiveness of prehospital implementation of our previously retrospectively derived and validated Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT) to identify subjects with severe stroke (NIHSS ≥15) among all prehospital patients with clinical suspicion of stroke/TIA. Secondarily, we evaluated the tool's ability to identify subjects with NIHSS ≥10, large vessel occlusion (LVO), or needing services available only at a CSC. METHODS: Without formalized training, Cincinnati Fire Department providers performed standard stroke screening ("face, arm, speech, time;" FAST) and C-STAT as part of their assessment of suspected stroke/TIA patients. Outcomes for patients brought to the region's only CSC or assessed by the regional stroke team were determined through structured chart review by a stroke team nurse. C-STAT test characteristics for each outcome were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Complete prehospital and outcome data were available for 58 FAST-positive subjects among 158 subjects with prehospital suspicion for stroke/TIA. Subjects were excluded if FAST was negative (n = 22), FAST or C-STAT was incompletely documented (n = 24), if the patient was taken to a non-CSC and did not receive a stroke team consult (n = 48), or if outcome data were missing (n = 6). C-STAT sensitivity and specificity for each outcome were: NIHSS ≥ 15, 77% (95% CI 46-95) and 84% (95% CI 69-93); NIHSS ≥10, 64% (95% CI 41-83) and 91% (95% CI 76-98); LVO, 71% (95% CI 29-96) and 70% (95% CI 55-83); overall CSC need 57% (95% CI 34-78) and 79% (95% CI 61-91). CONCLUSION: In this pilot prospective evaluation performed in the prehospital setting by EMS providers without formalized training, C-STAT is comparable to other published tools in test characteristics and may inform appropriate CSC triage beyond LVO ascertainment alone.

Combined Approach to Lysis Utilizing Eptifibatide and Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke-Full Dose Regimen Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Combined Approach to Lysis Utilizing Eptifibatide and Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator (r-tPA; CLEAR) in Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) and CLEAR-Enhanced Regimen (CLEAR-ER) trials demonstrated safety of reduced dose r-tPA plus the glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitor, eptifibatide, in AIS compared with r-tPA alone. The objective of the CLEAR-Full Dose Regimen (CLEAR-FDR) trial was to estimate the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in AIS patients treated with the combination of full-dose r-tPA plus eptifibatide. METHODS: CLEAR-FDR was a single-arm, prospective, open-label, multisite study. Patients aged 18 to 85 years treated with 0.9 mg/kg IV r-tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. After obtaining consent, eptifibatide (135 µg/kg bolus and 2-hour infusion at 0.75 µg/kg per minute) was administered. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who experienced sICH within 36 hours. An independent clinical monitor adjudicated if an sICH had occurred and an independent neuroradiologist reviewed all images. The stopping rule was 3 sICHs within the first 19 patients or 4 sICHs within 29 patients. RESULTS: From October 2013 to December 2014, 27 patients with AIS were enrolled. Median age was 73 years (range, 34-85; interquartile range, 65-80) and median National Institute of Health stroke scale score was 12 (range, 6-26; interquartile range, 9-16). One sICH (3.7%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7%-18%) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate comparable safety of full-dose r-tPA plus eptifibatide with historical rates of sICH with r-tPA alone and support proceeding with a phase 3 trial evaluating full-dose r-tPA combined with eptifibatide to improve outcomes after AIS.

Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator plus eptifibatide versus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator alone in acute ischemic stroke: propensity score-matched post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Combined Approach to Lysis Utilizing Eptifibatide and rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke-Enhanced Regimen (CLEAR-ER) trial demonstrated safety of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) plus eptifibatide in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). CLEAR-ER randomized AIS patients (5:1) to 0.6 mg/kg r-tPA plus eptifibatide versus standard r-tPA (0.9 mg/kg). Interventional Management of Stroke III randomized AIS patients to r-tPA plus endovascular therapy versus standard r-tPA. Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 2 randomized patients to albumin±r-tPA versus saline±r-tPA. Our aim was to compare outcomes in CLEAR-ER combination arm patients to propensity score-matched r-tPA only subjects in Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 2 and Interventional Management of Stroke III. METHODS: The primary outcome was 90-day severity-adjusted modified Rankin score (mRS) dichotomization based on baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS dichotomization as excellent (mRS, 0-1); mRS dichotomization as favorable (mRS, 0-2); and nonparametric analysis of the ordinal mRS. RESULTS: Eighty-five combination arm CLEAR-ER subjects were matched with 169 Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 2 and Interventional Management of Stroke III trials' r-tPA only patients (controls). Median age in CLEAR-ER and control subjects was 68years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in the CLEAR-ER subjects was 11 and in control subjects 12. At 90 days, CLEAR-ER subjects had a nonsignificantly greater proportion of patients with favorable outcomes (45% versus 36%; unadjusted relative risks, 1.24; 95% confidence intervals, 0.91-1.69; P=0.18). Secondary outcomes were 52% versus 34% excellent outcomes (relative risks, 1.51; 95% confidence intervals, 1.13-2.02; P=0.007); 60% versus 53% favorable outcome (relative risks, 1.13; 95% confidence intervals, 0.90-1.41; P=0.31); and ordinal Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P=0.10. CONCLUSION: r-tPA plus eptifibatide showed a favorable direction of effect that was consistent across multiple approaches for AIS outcome evaluation. A phase III trial to establish the efficacy of r-tPA plus eptifibatide for improving AIS outcomes is warranted.

A matched comparison of eptifibatide plus rt-PA versus rt-PA alone in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The Combined Approach to Lysis Utilizing Eptifibatide and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) in Acute Ischemic Stroke-Enhanced Regimen (CLEAR-ER) trial found that intravenous rt-PA plus eptifibatide (combination arm) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was safe and had a direction of effect that would justify a phase III trial. CLEAR-ER had unanticipated imbalances between treatment groups. We compared the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and good outcomes for combination therapy patients in the CLEAR-ER trial to a matched cohort of rt-PA patients from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial. METHODS: CLEAR-ER was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study; rt-PA-eligible AIS patients were randomized to .6 mg/kg rt-PA plus eptifibatide (135 mcg/kg bolus and .75mcg/kg/min two-hour infusion) versus standard rt-PA (.9 mg/kg). For this analysis, we matched 1:1 CLEAR-ER combination therapy patients with rt-PA arm NINDS trial patients. Patients were matched by age, gender, race, baseline modified Rankin Scale score, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and stroke onset to rt-PA time. RESULTS: Fifty-four matches were made. One (1.8%) sICH occurred in each group (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] .01-78.50). At 90 days, 51.8% of the CLEAR-ER group had good outcomes versus 46.3% in the NINDS rt-PA group (OR 1.30, 95% CI .57-2.96). For subjects with baseline NIHSS score > 12 (CLEAR-ER median NIHSS score), 38.5% of the CLEAR-ER group had good outcomes versus 23.1% in the NINDS group (OR 2.33, 95% CI .60-9.02). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and direction of effect of eptifibatide plus rt-PA were confirmed. A phase III trial is needed to determine the efficacy of eptifibatide plus rt-PA for improving long-term outcomes after AIS.

Combined approach to lysis utilizing eptifibatide and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke-enhanced regimen stroke trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In a previous study, 0.3 and 0.45 mg/kg of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) were safe when combined with eptifibatide 75 mcg/kg bolus and a 2-hour infusion (0.75 mcg/kg per minute). The Combined Approach to Lysis Utilizing Eptifibatide and rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke-Enhanced Regimen (CLEAR-ER) trial sought to determine the safety of a higher-dose regimen and to establish evidence for a phase III trial. METHODS: CLEAR-ER was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized safety study. Ischemic stroke patients were randomized to 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA plus eptifibatide (135 mcg/kg bolus and a 2-hour infusion at 0.75 mcg/kg per minute) versus standard rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg). The primary safety end point was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1 or return to baseline mRS at 90 days. Analysis of the safety and efficacy outcomes was done with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 126 subjects, 101 received combination therapy, and 25 received standard rt-PA. Two (2%) patients in the combination group and 3 (12%) in the standard group had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-1.40; P=0.053). At 90 days, 49.5% of the combination group had mRS ≤1 or return to baseline mRS versus 36.0% in the standard group (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-4.31; P=0.23). After adjusting for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, time to intravenous rt-PA, and baseline mRS, the odds ratio was 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-3.76; P=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The combined regimen of intravenous rt-PA and eptifibatide studied in this trial was safe and provides evidence that a phase III trial is warranted to determine efficacy of the regimen. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00894803.

Efficiency of enrollment in a successful phase II acute stroke clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Recruitment challenges are common in acute stroke clinical trials. In a population-based study, we determined eligibility and actual enrollment for a successful, phase II acute stroke clinical trial. We hypothesized that missed opportunities for enrollment of eligible patients occurred frequently, despite the success of the trial. METHODS: In 2005, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases in our region were identified at all 17 local hospitals as part of an epidemiologic study. The Combined Approach to Lysis Utilizing Eptifibatide and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (CLEAR) trial assessed the safety of this combination in AIS patients within 3 hours of symptom onset. In 2005, we determined the proportion of AIS patients who were eligible for CLEAR and the proportion that were actually enrolled. RESULTS: At 8 participating hospitals, 33 (2.8%) of 1175 AIS patients were eligible for CLEAR. Of 33 eligible patients, 18 (54.5%) were approached for enrollment, 4 (12.1%) refused, 1 (3.0%) was not consentable, and 13 (39.4%) were enrolled. Of the 15 not approached for enrollment in the trial, 10 were evaluated by the stroke team; 7 received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Enrollment was not associated with night or weekend presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the CLEAR trial was successful in meeting its delineated recruitment goals, our findings suggest enrollment could have been more efficient. Three out of 4 patients approached for enrollment participated in the trial. Eligible patients who were not approached and those treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator but not enrolled represent targets for improving enrollment rates.