[What Kind of Doctors Will be Needed in the Future?] / Welche Ärztinnen und Ärzte braucht es in der Zukunft?

What Kind of Doctors Will be Needed in the Future? Abstract: To get a notion regarding the future of medical doctors, the changes in the health care system and in society must be considered, for only then can the future professional profile be envisaged. The following text shall illustrate why more diversity among patients and staff as well as more diverse care settings are to be expected due to the coming social developments. Consequently, the professional role of medical doctors will become more fluid and more fragmentary. Medical careers will include more role changes in the future, and the question of co-evolution in the health professions will become much more relevant. All this raises fundamental considerations regarding education and training, but also regarding one's professional identity.

Team functioning across different tumour types: Insights from a Swiss cancer center using qualitative and quantitative methods.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary care is pivotal in cancer centres and the interaction of all cancer disease specialists in decision making processes is state-of-the-art. AIM: To describe differences of MDTMs by tumour type. METHODS: Twelve multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) with participation of different cancer disease specialists at a tertiary hospital were assessed by an exploratory sequential mixed method approach with interviews, observations and a survey to address the following five topics: organisational structure and supporting technology; leadership; teamwork; decision-making, perceived value and motivation. Thirteen persons with different tumour specialities and levels of seniority were interviewed. The 12 MDTMs were observed twice by uninvolved persons and evaluated by the participating physicians with a survey. RESULTS: There were no systematic differences between MDTMs for different tumour types with the exception of the non-disease specific type MDTM, which was the only one for which the organisational structure was not driven by an electronic tool. However, several factors could be identified that generally influenced the functioning of the MDTMs. In particular, the quality of decision-making was highly dependent on the availability of case-based information and the presence of relevant cancer disease specialists. Leadership and teamwork were rated as important and were comparable across the MDTM. Team participants' motivation and perceived value of MDTMs was high across all meetings. CONCLUSION: MDTM at a single institution did not demonstrate disease specific characteristics. An effective MDTM, irrespective of the tumour type, can be successfully structured by technical means and a chairperson coordinating the interaction of cancer disease specialists to improve the decision-making process.

Challenges in interprofessionalism in Swiss health care: the practice of successful interprofessional collaboration as experienced by professionals.

The topic of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between healthcare professionals has been widely discussed in recent years. Whereas the growing calls for more and better IPC can scarcely be ignored and a broad range of definitions and normative concepts have been proposed, it remains unclear what IPC actually means for practising professionals. This exploratory survey investigated the various ways in which successful IPC is understood in practice. As a main finding of the study, we were able to identify three distinct modes of collaboration between different professions in health care. Moreover, we provide evidence that whether and how IPC occurs strongly depends on the care contexts or settings in which these health professionals work. Explicit acknowledgement of and attention to these findings could improve the impact of initiatives to foster IPC.

Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite continuous development of anticalcification treatment for biological valve prostheses, calcification remains one major cause of structural failure. The following study investigates hemodynamics and changes in opening and closing kinematics in progressively calcified porcine and pericardial valves in a simulated exercise situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five pericardial (Edwards Perimount Magna) and five porcine (Medtronic Mosaic Ultra) aortic valve bioprostheses (23 mm) were investigated in an artificial circulation system (150 beats/min, cardiac output 8l/min). Leaflet kinematics were visualized with a high-speed camera (3000 frames/s). Valves were exposed to a calcifying solution for 6 weeks. Repeated testing was performed every week. All prostheses underwent X-ray and photographic examination including measurement of calcium content for evaluation of progressive calcification. RESULTS: In the exercise situation pericardial valves demonstrated lower pressure gradients initially compared to the porcine valves (8.5+/-1.4 vs 11+/-1.6 mmHg), but significantly higher closing volume (5.3+/-1.2 ml vs 1.2+/-0.2 ml of stroke volume) leading to an equal total energy. Neither valve type demonstrated a significant increase in gradient or closing volume compared to the normal output situation. Opening and closing times were longer for pericardial valves after 6 weeks (opening time 42+/-10 ms vs 28+/-10 ms, closing time 84+/-12 vs 52+/-10 ms after 6 weeks). Pericardial valves calcified faster and more severely leading to an increase in gradients and closure volume. CONCLUSIONS: In the exercise situation pericardial valves demonstrated superior systolic function compared to porcine valves. Therefore pericardial valves have some advantage in active patients due to the lower gradients. Total energy loss remained constant during progressive calcification for both valves. Leaflet opening and closing is faster in porcine valves; clinical impact of these findings is not known. Diastolic performance is also important and should always be tested also in vivo.

Hemodynamic performance of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses in critical low stroke volume.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Heart failure is common following aortic valve replacement, and optimal prosthesis function is crucial in this critical clinical setting. The study aim was to investigate the hemodynamic performance and leaflet kinematics of fresh and calcified biological aortic valves in a simulated low stroke volume situation. METHODS: Edwards Perimount Magna (PM) and Medtronic Mosaic Ultra (MU) valves were investigated in an artificial circulation system (130 beats/min, stroke volume 19 ml), and the results compared to normal output (70 beats/min, stroke volume 70 ml). Leaflet kinematics were visualized using a high-speed camera. All valves were exposed to a calcifying solution for six weeks. RESULTS: In the low- and normal-output situation, the PM valve initially demonstrated lower pressure gradients compared to the MU valve (low output 2.4 +/- 0.16 versus 3.4 +/- 0.19 mmHg), but showed a significantly higher closing volume (up to 19% of stroke volume) leading to an increased total energy loss. Regurgitation for the PM valve was explained by progressively longer opening and closing times. The PM valve calcified faster and more severely, leading to increasing gradients and closure volume. CONCLUSION: In the low stroke volume situation pericardial valves demonstrated superior systolic performance, but inferior diastolic performance, leading to a higher total energy loss compared to porcine valves. This finding may have clinical relevance in heart-failure patients.

Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: In vitro testing of biologic valves has been performed using only fresh but treated valves suitable for patient implantation. The present study investigates changes in hemodynamic performance and leaflet kinematics in progressively calcified porcine and pericardial aortic valve prostheses. METHODS: Edwards Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) (n = 5) and Medtronic Mosaic Ultra (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) (n = 5) heart valves (23 mm) were investigated in an artificial circulation system (70 beats/min, cardiac output 5 L/min). Leaflet kinematics were visualized with a high-speed camera (3000 frames/sec). Valves were then exposed to a calcium-phosphate solution at a constant pulse rate of 300 beats/min for a total of 6 weeks. Repeated testing was performed after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks of calcification. The calcification process might not be similar to in vivo performance. RESULTS: Initially, the Perimount Magna valves demonstrated lower pressure gradients compared with the Mosaic Ultra valves (9.7 +/- 0.36 mm Hg vs 14.0 +/- 1.16 mm Hg), but they showed higher closing volume and leakage flow. Total energy loss was equivalent after 1 week of calcification. Perimount Magna valves calcified significantly faster and more severely, leading to an increase in gradients and closure volume. Leaflet kinematics showed progressively longer opening and closing times for the pericardial valves (closing time Perimount Magna 135 +/- 11 msec vs Mosaic Ultra 85 +/- 9 msec after 6 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of visual inspection, despite the new ThermaFix (Edwards Lifesciences) tissue treatment, the Perimount Magna pericardial valves calcified in vitro faster and more severely than did the Mosaic Ultra porcine valves, which demonstrated a more constant performance throughout the calcification process. Leaflet kinematics showed a progressive prolongation of opening and closing times for pericardial valves, leading to higher closing volume.