Real-world effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infection: Results from the multicenter German hepatitis C cohort (GECCO-03).

There are limited data regarding the real world effectiveness of direct acting antivirals (DAA) for the therapy of chronic genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. All HCV genotype 3 infected patients from the German hepatitis C cohort (GECCO), which is a prospective database of nine German hepatitis C treatment centers, were included in the study. Three hundred forty-two chronically infected HCV genotype 3 patients were analyzed (253 males [74.0%], mean age 47.3 years, 127 cirrhotic patients [37.1%] mostly with Child A cirrhosis, 113 treatment experienced patients [37.1%], 38 HCV/HIV co-infected patients [11.1%]). SVR12 rates in the "intention-to-treat" analysis were as follows: sofosbuvir/ribavirin 69.4% (75/108), sofosbuvir/peginterferon/ribavirin 80.6% (58/72), sofosbuvir/daclatasvir ± ribavirin for 12 weeks 88.3% (53/63), sofosbuvir/daclatasvir ± ribavirin for 24 weeks 79.3% (23/29), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin for 12 weeks 71.4% (10/14), and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin for 24 weeks 86.7% (26/30). Forty patients were lost to follow-up, 23 patients had a relapse, 4 patients stopped treatment prematurely and 1 patient died. Female sex (P = 0.038) and treatment with two different DAAs (P = 0.05) were predictors for SVR12 in the multivariate analysis. In conclusion, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir ± ribavirin for 12 weeks and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin for 24 weeks are effective for the treatment of HCV genotype 3 infected patients including cirrhotic, treatment-experienced or HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

Effect of HBV polymerase inhibitors on renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Therapy of chronic hepatitis B with HBV-polymerase inhibitors, in particular tenofovir or adefovir, may affect renal function. To assess renal function more accurately in the normal range, we used the recently validated, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS: Patient subgroups included: patients with HBV-monoinfection treated with lamivudine (n=36), adefovir (n=32), entecavir (n=32), or tenofovir (n=37). HBsAg-positive untreated patients (n=60) served as control. For comparison HIV-monoinfected patients treated with tenofovir (n=120) or zidovudine (n=52) based antiretroviral therapy and antiretroviral naive patients (n=109) were assessed. CKD-EPI equation was used to calculate eGFR. In a more sensitive approach, we modeled the individual change in eGFR over time with linear mixed effects models (LME). RESULTS: Yearly predicted median changes in individual eGFR according to the LME model were: HBV untreated -2.05 ml/min, HBV lamivudine -0.92 ml/min, HBV adefovir -1.02 ml/min, HBV entecavir -1.00 ml/min, and HBV tenofovir -0.92 ml/min (p<0.01 for HBV untreated vs. HBV treated). In HIV-monoinfected patients: HIV untreated -0.62 ml/min, HIV treated with tenofovir -2.64 ml/min, HIV treated with zidovudine -1.0 ml/min (p=0.017 for tenofovir vs. no treatment, p<0.001 for tenofovir vs. zidovudine). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy of HBV infection irrespective of medication seems to result in a milder decrease of renal function. In contrast tenofovir as part of HIV combination therapy seems to impair renal function in this Caucasian population.

Cystatin C as a marker of renal function is affected by HIV replication leading to an underestimation of kidney function in HIV patients.

BACKGROUND: Broad use of tenofovir and an ageing HIV- infected population have created an interest in renal function in HIV patients. Serum cystatin C is a newer marker of renal function and might be more sensitive than creatinine. METHODS: Patients were enrolled consecutively in an observational study. HIV-seropositive patients naive to antiretroviral therapy (n = 261) were compared with healthy volunteers undergoing check-up procedures (n = 193). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was derived using creatinine-based Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault formulas or cystatin C-based calculations. HIV-seropositive patients starting antiretroviral therapy (n = 92) were followed prospectively after enrolment. RESULTS: MDRD showed a higher median eGFR in antiretroviral-naive HIV-seropositive patients compared with controls (104 versus 93 ml/min; P < 0.001). Cockcroft-Gault gave similar results (118 versus 106 ml/min; P < 0.001). By contrast, cystatin C levels in HIV-seropositive individuals were higher, resulting in a lower median eGFR compared with controls (99 versus 120 ml/min; P < 0.001). Cystatin C was positively correlated with HIV RNA (r = 0.33, P < 0.01) and inversely correlated with CD4+ T-cell count (r = -0.29, P < 0.01). Initiating antiretroviral therapy (n = 92) decreased cystatin C levels and led to an increased cystatin C-based eGFR from median 84 to 103 ml/min at week 24 (P < 0.001). Serum creatinine was not substantially altered. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of cystatin C with HIV RNA and CD4+ T-cell count, plus decrease of cystatin C after suppression of HIV replication, suggest an increase of cystatin C levels by active HIV infection. This might result in overestimation of renal impairment, particularly in treatment-naive patients. Therefore, use of cystatin C to calculate GFR in HIV-seropositive individuals should not be recommended without further validation.

Combination of tenofovir and lamivudine versus tenofovir after lamivudine failure for therapy of hepatitis B in HIV-coinfection.

OBJECTIVE: At present sequential monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-polymerase inhibitors is clinical practice. It is unknown to date whether combination therapy with lamivudine plus tenofovir could be superior to sequential therapy with tenofovir after the occurrence of lamivudine resistance. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, 1: 2 matched pair analysis comparing patients with HBV/HIV-coinfection starting an antiretroviral regimen including tenofovir plus lamivudine with patients who had highly replicative, lamivudine resistant HBe-antigen positive chronic hepatitis B and started with tenofovir as the only active HBV polymerase inhibitor subsequent to lamivudine. RESULTS: At baseline patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine (n = 25) had a median HBV DNA of 5.9 x 10(7) copies/ml compared to 1.37 x 10(8) copies/ml in the tenofovir arm (n = 50; P = 0.32). A sustained undetectable HBV DNA < 1000 copies/ml was achieved in 19/25 (76%) patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine and in 42/50 (84%) on tenofovir (P = 0.53). A loss of HBe-antigen was observed in 9/25 (36%) patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine and in 12/50 (24%) patients on tenofovir (P = 0.29). HBs-antigen loss was found in 1/25 (4%) and 3/50 (6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of HBV/HIV-coinfected individuals, full HBV DNA suppression was achieved in the majority of patients independent of treatment allocation. Loss of HBe- and HBs-antigen was not different between the two study arms. Over a median treatment period of 116 weeks tenofovir was as effective as tenofovir plus lamivudine. Longer treatment periods may be needed to evaluate potential benefits of first-line combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected patients.

OBJECTIVES: HIV-coinfection accelerates the course of HCV-related liver disease. Since, highly active anti-retroviral therapy significantly improved survival of HIV-patients more coinfected patients develop end stage liver disease. Therefore, treatment options for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected patients need to be evaluated. METHODS: Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alpha-2b (peg IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) was examined within this prospective, uncontrolled, multicentre trial. Patients received peg IFN (1.5 microg/kg) once weekly plus RBV 800 mg daily for 48 weeks for HCV genotypes (GT) 1/4 and 24 weeks for GT 2/3. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients were enrolled. Patients were predominantly male (68%) and former i.v. drug users (61%). Baseline characteristics (median) were as follows: age 39 years (range 23-58), CD4 count 494 cells/microl (range 150-1578/microl), HIV-RNA 2.3log copies/ml (range <1.7-5.4log copies/ml). 61% currently received anti-retroviral treatment. Fifty-six percent had HCV GT 1. EOT response was achieved by 52%. However, only 25% achieved sustained response (SR) due to a high relapse rate. SR rates were significantly higher among patients with GT 2/3 compared to those with GT 1/4 (44 vs. 18%). SR was observed in only one patient without early response (ER). Discontinuation rate was 30%, 21% discontinued due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Peg IFN/RBV appears safe and effective in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. GT 2/3 is associated with better SR. Lack of ER strongly predicts non-response. High relapse rates substantially reduce treatment success. In terms of toxicity neuro-psychiatric side effects frequently required treatment discontinuation.

Antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir is associated with mild renal dysfunction.

A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare patients treated with tenofovir with patients never treated with tenofovir. Patients on tenofovir showed a lower mean glomerular filtration rate estimated by creatinine clearance or cystatin C clearance compared with control patients. In total, 24 patients on tenofovir versus five control patients had proteinuria greater than 130 mg/day. In the majority of patients on tenofovir proteinuria was of tubular origin.

Differentiating hyperlipidaemia associated with antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidaemia associated with antiretroviral treatment has led to concerns for an increased cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess this cardiovascular risk by comparing the lipoprotein pattern of antiretroviral-treated and untreated HIV-positive patients with patients with familial combined hyperlipidaemia (high cardiovascular risk) or familial hypertriglyceridaemia (low cardiovascular risk). METHODS: Fasting serum samples were drawn from consecutive patients with HIV infection or lipoprotein disorders. Total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A1 and B were determined in serum. Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) was prepared by ultracentrifugation and analysed for cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B. RESULTS: Lipoprotein disorders were found in 114/187 HIV-positive patients (61%). Of these, according to the Fredrickson classification, 10% were type IIa (elevated LDL-cholesterol), 14% type IIb (elevated LDL- and VLDL-cholesterol) and 76% were type IV (elevated VLDL-cholesterol). VLDL composition was analysed in 34 HIV-positive patients with type IV hyperlipidaemia. The ratio of VLDL-triglycerides to VLDL-apolipoprotein B in these patients was 16.2 +/- 6.0. This ratio was not different from 14 patients with famlial hypertriglyceridaemia (16.9 +/- 6.0; = 0.61), but differed substantially from 10 patients with familial combined hyperlipidaemia (6.8 +/- 1.0; < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected patients with high VLDL, large VLDL particles were found with no increase in number. This pattern resembles familial hypertriglyceridaemia. It is different from familial combined hyperlipidaemia, where an increase in number of small-sized VLDL particles occurs. Further research is needed to assess the contribution of VLDL-associated hypercholesterolaemia in those taking antiretroviral drugs to the cardiovascular risk profile of HIV-positive patients.