Renal Transplantation in HIV-positive Renal Transplant Recipients: Experience at the Mannheim University Hospital.

Renal transplantation in HIV-positive patients with end-stage renal disease has in recent years become a successful treatment option. We report two patients who underwent renal transplantation using a combination of basiliximab, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids with a "non-interacting" antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of stavudine or abacavir, lamivudine, and nevirapine. We observed no acute rejection but a BK polyomavirus infection in both patients. In conclusion, a quadruple immunosuppression with an interleukin 2 receptor antagonist, a calcineurin inhibitor, MMF, and steroids appears to be advisable to prevent high rates of acute rejection, but if possible thereafter immunosuppression should be tapered rapidly (eg, MMF stop, prednisolone dose 5 mg/d). The selection of antiretroviral agents should avoid compounds that interact severely with the immunosuppression used.

Sequence and expression of the FcRn in the porcine mammary gland.

Transport of immunoglobulin G across epithelial cell barriers is thought to occur by a system involving the Fcgamma receptor called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). The FcRn may also play a role in IgG transport in the mammary gland. To determine the presence of FcRn in the porcine mammary gland, biopsies were taken from glands 3 days prepartum and on the day of farrowing. The full length porcine FcRn cDNA sequence was obtained by rapid amplification of cDNA ends and determined to be 1557 base pairs in length that codes for a 359 amino acid peptide. Expression of FcRn mRNA in the porcine mammary gland was determined by reverse transcriptase-PCR and revealed that the mRNA is present prepartum and on the day of farrowing. These results indicate that the FcRn is expressed in porcine mammary tissue and are consistent with the hypothesis that FcRn may have a role in mammary gland immunoglobulin transport during colostrogenesis.

ANCA titres, even of IgG subclasses, and soluble CD14 fail to predict relapses in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA) are presumed to reflect disease-activity and to be useful for guidance of immunosuppressive therapy of ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV), but with respect to conventional ANCA assays this is controversial. ANCA titres, measured in the IgG3 subclass and modern capture ELISAs, have been said to be superior predictors of relapses of AASV. METHODS: In this retrospective study serial measurements of ANCA parameters and soluble CD14 (sCD14) were performed in 169 consecutive sera over a median of 21 months in 18 patients with AASV and related to disease activity, assessed by Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) for new or deteriorated (BVAS1), and for chronic disease activity (BVAS2). Fourteen patients had Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and were C-ANCA positive with Pr 3-antibodies and four patients had microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) with P-ANCA and MPO-antibodies. In WG patients ANCA by IIF, Pr 3-ELISA for IgG, IgG1, IgG3, IgG4 and sCD14 were measured, as well as capture ELISA for Pr 3, and in MPA patients ANCA by IIF, MPO-ELISA for IgG and IgG1, IgG3, IgG4, and sCD14 respectively. In eight patients, data collection started at diagnosis, in 10 patients at remission. RESULTS: The parameters predicted neither the nine major relapses (increase of immunosuppression necessary), nor the 26 minor relapses (increase of BVAS1>2) with sufficient sensitivity (>80%) or specificity (> 90%90%), and they also failed to predict relapses within the following 2 months. ANCA-IgG3 and capture ELISA for Pr 3 were not advantageous for prediction of relapses (sensitivity 0.45 and 0.19 respectively), and sCD14 remained elevated in all samples irrespective of disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: There is no rationale for serial measurements of ANCA in AASV. For changes of therapy, the ANCA parameters should only be used in conjunction with clinical information.

Treatment with a combined endothelin A/B-receptor antagonist does not prevent chronic renal allograft rejection in rats.

A markedly increased expression of endothelin (ET)-1 has been observed in renal allografts with chronic rejection, one of the most common causes of kidney graft loss. In this study we investigated the effect of treatment with a combined ET-A/B-receptor antagonist on the course of chronic renal allograft rejection. Experiments were performed in the Fisher-to-Lewis rat model of chronic rejection. Lewis-to-Lewis isografts and uninephrectomized Lewis rats served as controls. Animals were treated with either the oral combined ET-A/B-receptor antagonist LU224332 (20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Animal survival, blood pressure, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and urinary ET excretion were investigated for 24 weeks. Kidneys were removed for light-microscopic evaluation and immunohistochemical assessment of cell-surface markers. Treatment with LU224332 did not improve survival after 24 weeks (0.47 vs. 0.38; p > 0.05 by log-rank test), nor did it have an influence on blood pressure, creatinine clearance, or proteinuria. Combined ET-A/B-receptor blockade was associated with a reduction of expression of cell-surface markers for macrophages (EDI), T-cells (R73), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II (F17-23-2), but did not lead to an improvement of histologic changes of chronic allograft rejection. Our data show that blocking both ET-A- and -B receptors, in opposition to a previously published beneficial effect of selective ET-A blockade, does not prevent the progression of chronic renal allograft rejection and does not prolong survival in this model. Functional integrity of the ET-B receptor therefore seems to play an important role in the nephroprotection provided by selective ET-A-receptor antagonists in chronic renal allograft nephropathy.

Prevention of chronic renal allograft rejection in rats with an oral endothelin A receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rejection is the most common cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. The pathomechanisms underlying chronic rejection are poorly understood, and no treatment has yet successfully been established. We hypothesized that, in analogy to models of reduced renal mass, the administration of a selective endothelin (ET) A receptor antagonist could improve the course of chronic rejection in renal allografts. METHODS: Experiments were performed in the Fisher-to-Lewis rat model of chronic rejection. Lewis-->Lewis isografts served as controls. Animals were treated with either the oral selective ET-A receptor antagonist LU135252 (50 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Animal survival, blood pressure, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and urinary ET excretion were investigated for 24 weeks. Kidneys were removed for light microscopical evaluation, determination of ET mRNA expression and tissue protein concentration, and immunohistochemical assessment of cell surface markers. RESULTS: Rats with chronic rejection showed an increase in renal ET mRNA synthesis and ET protein content. Treatment with LU135252 resulted in a significant improvement in survival after 24 weeks (0.92 vs. 0.38, P<0.01 by log-rank test). Creatinine clearance was higher in animals treated with the selective ET-A receptor antagonist (P<0.05). LU135252 had no influence on blood pressure and proteinuria. Selective ET-A blockade was associated with significantly less morphological changes and a significant reduction of expression of cell surface markers for macrophages (ED1), T cells (R73), and MHC II (F17-23-2). CONCLUSION: The renal ET-A system plays an important role in the pathomechanisms underlying chronic renal allograft rejection, because the treatment with a selective ET-A receptor antagonist dramatically improves the course of chronic renal failure after allograft transplantation. These results offer a novel therapeutical option for treatment of chronic renal allograft rejection, for which so far no therapy is known.