ABSTRACT
Importance: Women remain underrepresented in ophthalmology and gender-based disparities exist in salary, grant receipt, publication rates, and surgical volume throughout training and in practice. Although studies in emergency medicine and general surgery showed mixed findings regarding gender differences in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones ratings, limited data exist examining such differences within ophthalmology. Objective: To examine gender differences in ophthalmology ACGME Milestones. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of postgraduate year 4 (PGY-4) residents from 120 ophthalmology programs graduating in 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: PGY-4 midyear and year-end medical knowledge (MK) and patient care (PC) ratings and Written Qualifying Examination (WQE) scaled scores for residents graduating in 2019 were included. Differential prediction techniques using Generalized Estimating Equations models were performed to identify differences by gender. Results: Of 452 residents (median [IQR] age, 30.0 [29.0-32.0] years), 275 (61%) identified as men and 177 (39%) as women. There were no differences in PC domain average between women and men for both midyear (-0.07; 95% CI, -0.11 to 0; P =.06) and year-end (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.03; P =.51) assessment periods. For the MK domain average in the midyear assessment period, women (mean [SD], 3.76 [0.50]) were rated lower than men (mean [SD], 3.88 [0.47]; P = .006) with a difference in mean of -0.12 (95% CI, -0.18 to -0.03). For the year-end assessment, however, the average MK ratings were not different for women (mean [SD], 4.10 [0.47]) compared with men (mean [SD], 4.18 [0.47]; P = .20) with a difference in mean of -0.08 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.03). Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that ACGME ophthalmology Milestones in 2 general competencies did not demonstrate major gender bias on a national level at the time of graduation. There were, however, differences in MK ratings at the midyear mark, and as low ratings on evaluations and examinations may adversely affect career opportunities for trainees, it is important to continue further work examining other competencies or performance measures for potential biases.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the likelihood of disciplinary actions against medical licenses of ophthalmologists who maintained board certification through successful completion of the American Board of Ophthalmology Maintenance of Certification program compared with ophthalmologists who did not maintain certification. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of ophthalmologists certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology from 1992 to 2012 with time-limited certificates. Rates and severity of disciplinary actions against medical licenses were analyzed among ophthalmologists who did and did not maintain certification. RESULTS: Of 9111 ophthalmologists who earned initial board certification between 1992 and 2012, 8073 (88.6%) maintained their certification and 1038 (11.4%) did not maintain their certification. A total of 234 license actions were identified in the study group. Among ophthalmologists who did not maintain board certification, the risk of a license action was more than 2 times that of those who maintained board certification (hazard ratio = 2.34, 95% CI=1.73-3.18). License actions were significantly higher in men than in women (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% CI=1.43-2.86). Ophthalmologists who had a lapse in their certification had a higher severity of disciplinary actions (χ2 = 9.21, p <.01) than ophthalmologists who maintained their certification. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports prior literature in other specialties demonstrating a higher risk of disciplinary licensure actions in physicians who did not maintain board certification as compared with those who did. Physicians who did not maintain certification were also more likely to have actions against their license reflecting a higher severity violation. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
