Blended learning for accredited life support courses - A systematic review.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness on educational and resource outcomes of blended compared to non-blended learning approaches for participants undertaking accredited life support courses. Methods: This review was conducted in adherence with PRISMA standards. We searched EMBASE.com (including all journals listed in Medline), CINAHL and Cochrane from 1 January 2000 to 6 August 2021. Randomised and non-randomised studies were eligible for inclusion. Study screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (using RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools), and certainty of evidence evaluation (using GRADE) were all independently performed in duplicate. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022274392). Results: From 2,420 studies, we included data from 23 studies covering fourteen basic life support (BLS) with 2,745 participants, eight advanced cardiac life support (ALS) with 33,579 participants, and one Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) with 92 participants. Blended learning is at least as effective as non-blended learning for participant satisfaction, knowledge, skills, and attitudes. There is potential for cost reduction and eventual net profit in using blended learning despite high set up costs. The certainty of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and inconsistency. Heterogeneity across studies precluded any meta-analysis. Conclusion: Blended learning is at least as effective as non-blended learning for accredited BLS, ALS, and ATLS courses. Blended learning is associated with significant long term cost savings and thus provides a more efficient method of teaching. Further research is needed to investigate specific delivery methods and the effect of blended learning on other accredited life support courses.

Arterial stiffness in acute COVID-19 and potential associations with clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) interferes with the vascular endothelium. It is not known whether COVID-19 additionally affects arterial stiffness. METHODS: This case-control study compared brachial-ankle pulse wave (baPWV) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocities (cfPWV) of acutely ill patients with and without COVID-19. RESULTS: Twenty-two COVID-19 patients (50% females, 77 [67-84] years) were compared with 22 age- and sex-matched controls. In COVID-19 patients, baPWV (19.9 [18.4-21.0] vs. 16.0 [14.2-20.4], P = 0.02) and cfPWV (14.3 [13.4-16.0] vs. 11.0 [9.5-14.6], P = 0.01) were higher than in the controls. In multiple regression analysis, COVID-19 was independently associated with higher cfPWV (ß = 3.164, P = 0.004) and baPWV (ß = 3.532, P = 0.003). PWV values were higher in nonsurvivors. In survivors, PWV correlated with length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 appears to be related to an enhanced PWV reflecting an increase in arterial stiffness. Higher PWV might be related to an increased length of hospital stay and mortality.

Clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in low-resource settings - A scoping review.

AIM OF THE SCOPING REVIEW: Scientific recommendations on resuscitation are typically formulated from the perspective of an ideal resource environment, with little consideration of applicability in lower-income countries. We aimed to determine clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in low-resource countries, to identify shortcomings related to resuscitation in these areas and possible solutions, and to suggest future research priorities. DATA SOURCES: This scoping review was part of the continuous evidence evaluation process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), and was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We identified low-resource countries as countries with a low- or middle gross national income per capita (World Bank data). We performed a literature search on outcomes after OHCA in these countries, and we extracted data on the outcome. We applied descriptive statistics and conducted a post-hoc correlation analysis of cohort size and ROSC rates. RESULTS: We defined 24 eligible studies originating from middle-income countries, but none from low-income regions, suggesting a reporting bias. The number of reported patients in these studies ranged from 54 to 3214. Utstein-style reporting was rarely used. Return of spontaneous circulation varied from 0% to 62%. Fifteen studies reported on survival to hospital discharge (between 1.0 and 16.7%) or favourable neurological outcome (between 1.0 and 9.3%). An inverse correlation was found for study cohort size and the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ρ = -0.48, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Studies of OHCA outcomes in low-resource countries are heterogeneous and may be compromised by reporting bias. Minimum cardiopulmonary resuscitation standards for low-resource settings should be developed collaboratively involving local experts, respecting culture and context while balancing competing health priorities.

Hemodynamic effects of Vernakalant in cardio-surgical ICU-patients treated for recent-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most frequent complications after cardiothoracic surgery and a predictor for postoperative mortality and prolonged ICU-stay. Current guidelines suggest the multi-channel inhibitor Vernakalant as a treatment option for rhythm control. However, rare cases of severe hypotension and cardiogenic shock following drug administration have been reported. To elucidate the impact of Vernakalant on hemodynamics, we included ten ICU patients developing POAF after elective cardiac surgery, all of them awake and breathing spontaneously, in this prospective trial. Patients received the recommended dosage of Vernakalant and were clinically observed and monitored (heart rate, invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, central venous pressure) in 1-minute-intervals for 20 minutes before- and 120 minutes after the first dose of Vernakalant. The median time from the end of surgery until occurrence of POAF amounted up to 52.8 [45.9-77.4] hours, it took 3.5 [1.2-10.1] hours from occurrence of POAF until the first application of Vernakalant. All patients received catecholamine support with epinephrine that was held steady and not dynamic throughout the observational phase. We noted stable hemodynamic conditions, with a trend towards a reduction in heart rate throughout the 120 minutes after drug administration. In 7 patients (70%), conversion to sustained sinus rhythm (SR) occurred within 8.0 minutes [6.0-9.0]. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were noted during the observation period. In this prospective trial in ICU-patients showing POAF after cardiac surgery, intravenous Vernakalant did not induce clinically relevant negative effects on patients' hemodynamics but resulted in conversion to sustained SR after a median of 8.0 minutes in 7 out of ten patients.

Regional cerebral oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a predictor of return of spontaneous circulation and favourable neurological outcome - A review of the current literature.

INTRODUCTION: Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) can be measured non-invasively even at no- or low-flow states. It thus allows assessment of brain oxygenation during CPR. Certain rSO2 values had been associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurological outcome in the past. Clear-cut thresholds for the prediction of beneficial outcome, however, are still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a database search to extract all available investigations on rSO2 measurement during CPR. Mean, median, and ΔrSO2 values were either taken from the studies or calculated. Thresholds for the outcome "ROSC" and "neurological outcome" were sought. RESULTS: We retrieved 26 publications for the final review. The averaged mean rSO2 for patients achieving ROSC was 41 ±â€¯12% vs. 30 ±â€¯12% for non-ROSC (p = .009). ROSC was not observed when mean rSO2 remained <26%. In ROSC patients, ΔrSO2 was 22 ±â€¯16% vs. 7 ±â€¯10% in non-ROSC patients (p = .009). A rSO2 threshold of 36% predicted ROSC with a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 69% while ΔrSO2 of 7% showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86% (AUC = 0.733 and 0.893, respectively). Mean rSO2 of 47 ±â€¯11% was associated with favourable and 38 ±â€¯12% with poor neurological outcome. There was, however, a great overlap between groups due to scarce data. CONCLUSION: Higher rSO2 consistently correlated with increased rates of ROSC. The discriminatory power of rSO2 to prognosticate favourable neurological outcome remains unclear. Measuring rSO2 during CPR could potentially facilitate clinical decision-making.