Chemokine receptor-targeted PET/CT provides superior diagnostic performance in newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma patients: a head-to-head comparison with [18F]FDG.

BACKGROUND: In patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), [18F]FDG PET/CT provided inconsistent diagnostic accuracy. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in MZL and thus, may emerge as novel theranostic target. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CXCR4-targeting [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor when compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT in MZL. METHODS: Thirty-two untreated MZL patients (nodal, n = 17; extranodal, n = 13; splenic, n = 2) received [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor and [18F]FDG PET/CT within median 2 days. We performed a visual and quantitative analysis of the total lymphoma volume by measuring maximum/peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax/peak), and calculating target-to-background ratios (TBR, defined as lesion-based SUVpeak divided by SUVmean from blood pool). Visual comparisons for both radiotracers were carried out for all target lesions (TL), and quantitative analysis of concordant TL evident on both scans. Last, MZL subtype analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: On a patient-based level, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor identified MZL manifestations in 32 (100%) subjects (vs. [18F]FDG, 25/32 [78.1%]). Of the 256 identified TL, 127/256 (49.6%) manifestations were evident only on CXCR4-directed imaging, while only 7/256 (2.7%) were identified on [18F]FDG but missed by [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor. In the remaining 122/256 (47.7%) concordant TL, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor consistently provided increased metrics when compared to [18F]FDG: SUVmax, 10.3 (range, 2.53-37.2) vs. 5.72 (2.32-37.0); SUVpeak, 6.23 (1.58-25.7) vs. 3.87 (1.54-27.7); P < 0.01, respectively. Concordant TL TBR on [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor (median, 3.85; range, 1.05-16.0) was also approximately 1.8-fold higher relative to [18F]FDG (median, 2.08; range, 0.81-28.8; P < 0.01). Those findings on image contrast, however, were driven by nodal MZL (P < 0.01), and just missed significance for extranodal MZL (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed MZL patients, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor identified more sites of disease when compared to [18F]FDG, irrespective of MZL subtype. Quantitative PET parameters including TBR were also higher on [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, suggesting improved diagnostic read-out using chemokine receptor-targeted imaging.

Chemokine Receptor PET/CT Provides Relevant Staging and Management Changes in Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

Because of gastral and extranodal manifestations, guideline-compatible diagnostic work-up of marginal zone lymphoma is challenging. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed PET/CT compared with routine diagnostics, along with PET/CT-based retrospective changes in therapeutic management. The predictive potential of the PET signal was also investigated, and the number of patients eligible for CXCR4-directed radioligand therapy in a theranostic setting was determined. Methods: For this study, 100 marginal zone lymphoma patients underwent CXCR4-directed PET/CT. We compared staging results and treatment decisions from molecular imaging with respective results from guideline-compatible work-up (CT, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and bone marrow-derived biopsy). Prognostic performance of the in vivo CXCR4 PET signal for progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated (using log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves). Results: Relative to CT, CXCR4-directed imaging led to Ann Arbor (AA) staging changes for 27 of 100 patients (27.0%). Among those, clinically relevant upstaging from AA I or AA II to AA III or AA IV was observed for 23 patients (85.2%), along with respective changes in therapeutic management (escalation, 6/23 [26.1%]; deescalation, 17/23 [73.9%]). CXCR4 PET/CT yielded diagnostic accuracy of 94.0% relative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 76.8% relative to bone marrow-derived biopsy. An increased CXCR4 PET signal was linked to shorter PFS (707 d vs. median PFS not reached; hazard ratio, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.37-7.35; P = 0.01). CXCR4-directed radioligand therapy would have been feasible for 18 of 100 patients (18.0%). Conclusion: Relative to CT, CXCR4-directed PET/CT led to AA changes for 27 of 100 patients. Chemokine receptor PET/CT may improve current diagnostic algorithms and influence management relative to CT alone, potentially obviating some biopsies.

Lymphoma-Sink Effect in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Based on CXCR4-Targeted Molecular Imaging.

PURPOSE: Recent studies investigating a tumor-sink effect in solid tumors reported on decreasing uptake in normal organs in patients with higher tumor burden. This phenomenon, however, has not been evaluated yet for theranostic radiotracers applied to hematological neoplasms. As such, we aimed to determine a potential "lymphoma-sink effect" in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) imaged with C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4-directed PET/CTs. PROCEDURES: We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients with MZL who underwent CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Normal unaffected organ uptake (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, kidneys) was quantified using volumes of interests (VOIs) and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) were derived. MZL manifestations were also segmented to determine the maximum and peak standardized uptake values SUV (SUVmax/peak) and volumetric parameters, including lymphoma volume (LV), and fractional lymphoma activity (FLA, defined as LV*SUVmean of lymphoma burden). This approach resulted in 666 VOIs to capture the entire MZL manifestation load. We used Spearman's rank correlations to determine associations between organ uptake and CXCR4-expressing lymphoma lesions. RESULTS: We recorded the following median SUVmean in normal organs: heart, 1.82 (range, 0.78-4.11); liver, 1.35 (range, 0.72-2.99); bone marrow, 2.36 (range, 1.12-4.83); kidneys, 3.04 (range, 2.01-6.37); spleen, 5.79 (range, 2.07-10.5). No relevant associations between organ radiotracer uptake and MZL manifestation were observed, neither for SUVmax (ρ ≤ 0.21, P ≥ 0.07), SUVpeak (ρ ≤ 0.20, P ≥ 0.09), LV (ρ ≤ 0.13, P ≥ 0.27), nor FLA (ρ ≤ 0.15, P ≥ 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Investigating a lymphoma-sink effect in patients with hematological neoplasms, we observed no relevant associations between lymphoma burden and uptake in normal organs. Those observations may have therapeutic implications, e.g., for "cold" SDF1-pathway disrupting or "hot," CXCR4-directed radiolabeled drugs, as with higher lymphoma load, normal organ uptake seems to remain stable.