The Potential of Evidence-Based Clinical Intake Tools to Discover or Ground Prevalence of Symptoms Using Real-Life Digital Health Encounters: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical intake tools (EBCITs) are structured assessment tools used to gather information about patients and help health care providers make informed decisions. The growing demand for personalized medicine, along with the big data revolution, has rendered EBCITs a promising solution. EBCITs have the potential to provide comprehensive and individualized assessments of symptoms, enabling accurate diagnosis, while contributing to the grounding of medical care. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to examine whether EBCITs cover data concerning disorders and symptoms to a similar extent as physicians, and thus can reliably address medical conditions in clinical settings. We also explore the potential of EBCITs to discover and ground the real prevalence of symptoms in different disorders thereby expanding medical knowledge and further supporting medical diagnoses made by physicians. METHODS: Between August 1, 2022, and January 15, 2023, patients who used the services of a digital health care (DH) provider in the United States were first assessed by the Kahun EBCIT. Kahun platform gathered and analyzed the information from the sessions. This study estimated the prevalence of patients' symptoms in medical disorders using 2 data sets. The first data set analyzed symptom prevalence, as determined by Kahun's knowledge engine. The second data set analyzed symptom prevalence, relying solely on data from the DH patients gathered by Kahun. The variance difference between these 2 prevalence data sets helped us assess Kahun's ability to incorporate new data while integrating existing knowledge. To analyze the comprehensiveness of Kahun's knowledge engine, we compared how well it covers weighted data for the symptoms and disorders found in the 2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NMCAS). To assess Kahun's diagnosis accuracy, physicians independently diagnosed 250 of Kahun-DH's sessions. Their diagnoses were compared with Kahun's diagnoses. RESULTS: In this study, 2550 patients used Kahun to complete a full assessment. Kahun proposed 108,523 suggestions related to symptoms during the intake process. At the end of the intake process, 6496 conditions were presented to the caregiver. Kahun covered 94% (526,157,569/562,150,572) of the weighted symptoms and 91% (1,582,637,476/173,4783,244) of the weighted disorders in the 2019 NMCAS. In 90% (224/250) of the sessions, both physicians and Kahun suggested at least one identical disorder, with a 72% (367/507) total accuracy rate. Kahun's engine yielded 519 prevalences while the Kahun-DH cohort yielded 599; 156 prevalences were unique to the latter and 443 prevalences were shared by both data sets. CONCLUSIONS: ECBITs, such as Kahun, encompass extensive amounts of knowledge and could serve as a reliable database for inferring medical insights and diagnoses. Using this credible database, the potential prevalence of symptoms in different disorders was discovered or grounded. This highlights the ability of ECBITs to refine the understanding of relationships between disorders and symptoms, which further supports physicians in medical diagnosis.

Validated mobile applications in otolaryngology head and neck surgery for patient and physicians: A systematic literature review.

IMPORTANCE: Mobile apps in the field of ORL-HNS, are widely used by patients and physicians, but neither necessarily developed in collaboration with healthcare professionals nor subjected to regulations by the United States Food and Drug Administration guidelines, with a resultant potential of risk for its users. OBJECTIVE: To provide the ORL-HNS physician with an updated list of scientific peer review literature- validated mobile apps for safe use for both the clinician and the patients, for screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow up for various ORL-HNS pathologies. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A comprehensive systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted in "PubMed," "EMBASE," and "Web of Science" without limitation of publication date up to January 1st, 2023. The included papers validated mobile apps in the ORL-HNS discipline. Each study was evaluated using the "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology" (STROBE) tool. FINDINGS: From the thousands of unregulated ORL-HNS mobile apps available for download and use in the various app stores, only 17 apps were validated for safe use by the clinician and/or patient. Their information is listed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The limited number of validated mobile apps highlights the importance to use validated apps in clinical practice, to improve evidence-based medicine and patient safety. Physician are encouraged to use and recommend their patients to use validated mobile apps only, like any other tool in clinical practice in the evidence-based era.

Can Dialysis Patients Identify and Diagnose Pulmonary Congestion Using Self-Lung Ultrasound?

BACKGROUND: With the recent developments in automated tools, smaller and cheaper machines for lung ultrasound (LUS) are leading us toward the potential to conduct POCUS tele-guidance for the early detection of pulmonary congestion. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a self-lung ultrasound study conducted by hemodialysis (HD) patients to detect pulmonary congestion, with and without artificial intelligence (AI)-based automatic tools. METHODS: This prospective pilot study was conducted between November 2020 and September 2021. Nineteen chronic HD patients were enrolled in the Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC) Dialysis Clinic. First, we examined the patient's ability to obtain a self-lung US. Then, we used interrater reliability (IRR) to compare the self-detection results reported by the patients to the observation of POCUS experts and an ultrasound (US) machine with an AI-based automatic B-line counting tool. All the videos were reviewed by a specialist blinded to the performer. We examined their agreement degree using the weighted Cohen's kappa (Kw) index. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included in our analysis. We found moderate to substantial agreement between the POCUS expert review and the automatic counting both when the patient performed the LUS (Kw = 0.49 [95% CI: 0.05-0.93]) and when the researcher performed it (Kw = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.67-0.67]). Patients were able to place the probe in the correct position and present a lung image well even weeks from the teaching session, but did not show good abilities in correctly saving or counting B-lines compared to an expert or an automatic counting tool. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that LUS self-monitoring for pulmonary congestion can be a reliable option if the patient's count is combined with an AI application for the B-line count. This study provides insight into the possibility of utilizing home US devices to detect pulmonary congestion, enabling patients to have a more active role in their health care.

Real time wire localization by ultrasound during central line insertion improves accurate positioning in all upper torso sites.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether point of care ultrasound can improve central venous catheter tip positioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single center retrospective case control study. We compared the precision of central venous catheter tip positioning between two intensive care units while in only one of the units, we used point of care ultrasound for guidewire identification. RESULTS: 207 cases in which central venous catheter was inserted using point of care ultrasound guided method, compared to 192 controls. The primary outcome of correct placement of the central venous catheter tip was significantly higher in the point of care ultrasound guided group (97.6% vs 88.0% p = 0.001). Central venous catheter tip was located too low among 12% of patients in the control group while in only 2.4% of patients in the point of care ultrasound group (p = 0.001). Logistics regression analysis revealed that the correct placement of central venous catheter tip in the point of care ultrasound group versus the control group had an odds ratio of 4.9 (CI 1.6-14.5 P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Point of care ultrasound for guidewire identification and localization, while inserting central venous catheter from all upper torso sites, improves precision positioning.