ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Impairment of sleep quality directly increases the risk of heart attack, obesity, and stroke, among other conditions, which makes polysomnography (PSG) an important public health tool. However, the inherent problems with PSG render the correct diagnosis of sleep diseases a difficult task. As a novel alternative to the class II PSG system, this work presents a distributed system composed of three modules, which together are capable of the simultaneous monitoring of environmental variables and patient signals. This system could reduce the distress of a PSG exam in certain cases, dismiss the need for an overnight sleep in a healthcare/sleep centre, and facilitate self-setup and internet-based diagnosis. Methods Hardware and software capable of synchronously monitoring, processing and logging into a µSD card environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, visible light intensity and audible noise level) and directly measured patient signals (electrocardiogram, electrooculogram, and body and limb posture) were designed and implemented. Results A novel alternative to the class III PSG system was demonstrated with independent boards capable of operating for more than 16 hours powered by a 750 mAh/3.7 V battery with 0.003% data loss during preliminary PSG exams. Additionally, a computer-based library capable of reading, decoding, estimating respiration through ECG, and calculating the heart rate was developed and described. Conclusion This article contributes to PSG research through the development of a new PSG system and the improvement of patient comfort. All software and hardware developed are fully open source and available on GitHub.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Effective ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality rates in cardiac arrest. Hyperventilation during CPR reduces the efficiency of compressions and coronary perfusion. Problem How could ventilation in CPR be optimized? The objective of this study was to evaluate non-invasive ventilator support using different devices. METHODS: The study compares the regularity and intensity of non-invasive ventilation during simulated, conventional CPR and ventilatory support using three distinct ventilation devices: a standard manual resuscitator, with and without airway pressure manometer, and an automatic transport ventilator. Student's t-test was used to evaluate statistical differences between groups. P values <.05 were regarded as significant. RESULTS: Peak inspiratory pressure during ventilatory support and CPR was significantly increased in the group with manual resuscitator without manometer when compared with the manual resuscitator with manometer support (MS) group or automatic ventilator (AV) group. CONCLUSION: The study recommends for ventilatory support the use of a manual resuscitator equipped with MS or AVs, due to the risk of reduction in coronary perfusion pressure and iatrogenic thoracic injury during hyperventilation found using manual resuscitator without manometer. Lacerda RS , de Lima FCA , Bastos LP , Vinco AF , Schneider FBA , Coelho YL , Fernandes HGC , Bacalhau JMR , Bermudes IMS , da Silva CF , da Silva LP , Pezato R . Benefits of manometer in non-invasive ventilatory support. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):615-620.
