Disorganized care: the findings of an iterative, in-depth analysis of surgical morbidity and mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Performance improvement driven by the review of surgical morbidity and mortality is often limited to critiques of individual cases with a focus on individual errors. Little attention has been given to an analysis of why a decision seemed right at the time or to lower-level root causes. The application of scientific performance improvement has the potential to bring to light deeper levels of understanding of surgical decision-making, care processes, and physician psychology. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective chart review of previously discussed morbidity and mortality cases was performed with an attempt to identify areas where we could better understand or influence behavior or systems. We avoided focusing on traditional sources of human error such as lapses of vigilance or memory. An iterative process was used to refine the practical areas for possible intervention. Definitions were then created for the major categories and subcategories. RESULTS: Of a sample of 152 presented cases, the root cause for 96 (63%) patient-related events was identified as uni-factorial in origin, with 51 (34%) cases strictly related to patient disease with no other contributing causes. Fifty-six cases (37%) had multiple causes. The remaining 101 cases (66%) were categorized into two areas where the ability to influence outcomes appeared possible. Technical issues were found in 27 (18%) of these cases and 74 (74%) were related to disorganized care problems. Of the 74 cases identified with disorganized care, 42 (42%) were related to failures in critical thinking, 18 (18%) to undisciplined treatment strategies, 8 (8%) to structural failures, and 6 (6%) were related to failures in situational awareness. CONCLUSIONS: On a comprehensive review of cases presented at the morbidity and mortality conference, disorganized care played a large role in the cases presented and may have implications for future curriculum changes. The failure to think critically, to deliver disciplined treatment strategies, to recognize structural failures, and to achieve situational awareness contributed to the morbidities and mortalities. Future research may determine if focused training in these areas improves patient outcomes.

A disciplined approach to implementation of evidence-based practices decreases ICU and hospital length of stay in traumatically injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine has gained wide acceptance in practice of medicine since the 1990s. The objective of our study was to demonstrate the effect of evidence-based critical care practices on ICU and hospital length of stay in mechanically ventilated trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort using historic controls. During 2004, several different evidence-based practices were implemented, including low tidal volume ventilation, protocol driven trauma resuscitation, and a sepsis bundle. Outcomes in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients who were ≥ 18 y old were compared between a historic control group (2000-2003) and the study group after implementation (2005-2008). Patients were identified using the institutional trauma registry (NATIONAL TRACS). Gender, age, ISS, mechanism of injury, and mortality were also examined to identify trends in epidemiology. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2003. there were 6920 trauma admissions and during 2005-2008 there were 8911 (increase of 28.8%). These included 217 and 337 (increase of 55.3%) admissions to the ICU of mechanically ventilated patients, respectively. The mean age was 43.9 y versus 45.9 y (P = 0.258). Males were 66.4% versus 71.8% (P = 0.610). The mean ISS was 29 versus 27 (P = 0.25). Blunt mechanism was 87% versus 89% (P = 0.913). Mortality rate was 36.4% versus 36.5% (P = 0.944). The mean number of ICU days and hospital days decreased from 7.6 versus 5.5 (P = 0.02) and 13.2 versus 9.7 (P = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: The application of evidence-based critical care practices decreases length of ICU and hospital stay, but not mortality, in critically ill, mechanically ventilated trauma patients. Our trauma volume, including critically ill patients, increased during the study periods.

Frequency and severity of systemic disease in patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and severity of systemic disease in patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) followed up in a dermatology practice vs patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) followed up in a rheumatology practice. DESIGN: Case-control comparison of patients matched for age, sex, and ethnicity. SETTING: University-affiliated dermatology and rheumatology practices. PATIENTS: Seventy-six patients with SCLE were compared with 24 patients with SLE. INTERVENTION: All medical records were reviewed and the patients were interviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systemic and serologic findings were compared between patients with SCLE and those with SLE. RESULTS: Hematologic disorders were present in 6 patients (8%) with SCLE and in 13 patients (54%) with SLE (P<.001). Serositis was present in 1 patient (1%) with SCLE and in 3 patients (12%) with SLE (P =.04). Renal involvement was present in 12 patients (16%) with SCLE and in 6 patients (25%) with SLE (P =.36). Antinuclear antibodies were found in 52 patients (68%) with SCLE compared with 23 patients (96%) with SLE (P =.006). Anti-Ro antibodies were found in 37 patients (49%) with SCLE compared with 10 patients (42%) with SLE (P =.64). Other serologic abnormalities (anti-native DNA, anti-Sm antibody, or anti-U(1)RNP) were present in 6 patients (8%) with SCLE compared with 15 patients (62%) with SLE (P<.001). Photosensitivity was present in 65 patients (86%) with SCLE, compared with 11 patients (46%) with SLE (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals a dissimilar frequency of internal organ involvement between patients with SCLE and SLE. Renal disease was similar in frequency and severity, and documented central nervous system involvement was rare in both groups.