Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Visc Surg ; 158(5): 370-377, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461889

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic ascites (PA) is an unusual and little studied complication of chronic alcoholic pancreatitis. Management is complex and is based mainly on empirical data. The aim of this retrospective work was to analyse the management of PA at our centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients with PA complicating chronic alcoholic pancreatitis were managed at the Lille University Hospital between 2004 and 2018. Treatment was initially medical and then, in case of failure, interventional (endoscopic, radiological and/or surgical). Data regarding epidemiology, therapeutic and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were analysed; median follow-up was 18.5 months [6.75-34.25]. Exclusively medical treatment was effective in three of four patients, but, based on intention to treat, medical therapy alone was effective in only two out of 24 patients. Of 17 patients treated endoscopically, treatment was successful in 15 of them. Of the 15 who underwent surgery, external surgical drainage was effective in 13. Multimodal treatment, initiated after 6.5 days [4-13.5] of medical treatment, was effective in 12 out of 14 patients. In total, 21 patients were successfully treated (87%) with a morbidity rate of 79% and a mortality rate of 12.5% (n=3). CONCLUSION: PA gives rise to significant morbidity and mortality. Conservative medical treatment has only a limited role. If medical treatment fails, endoscopic and then surgical treatment allow a favourable outcome in more than 80% of patients.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Pseudocyst , Pancreatitis, Alcoholic , Ascites/etiology , Ascites/therapy , Drainage/adverse effects , Humans , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/etiology , Pancreatitis, Alcoholic/complications , Pancreatitis, Alcoholic/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 65(4): e15-e21, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517871

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the outcome for patients who had undergone perineal hernia repair, via a perineal approach, using a biological mesh post-abdominoperineal excision (APE) for anorectal cancer. METHOD: All consecutive patients having undergone perineal hernia repair involving an extracellular matrix of porcine small intestinal submucosa at our hospital between 2015 and 2018 were included. Follow-up clinical examinations and computed tomography scans were performed. RESULTS: Six patients were treated surgically for symptomatic perineal hernia after a median of 31 months from APE. The median follow-up after hernia repair was 11 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-35 months). Three patients (50%) developed a recurrent perineal hernia after a median interval of 6 months. CONCLUSION: Perineal hernia repair using a biological mesh resulted in a high recurrence rate in patients who had undergone APE for anorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Animals , Hernia/etiology , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Perineum/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Mesh , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...