Is the French Paradox cementing philosophy superior to the standard cementing? A randomized controlled radiostereometric trial and comparative analysis.

AIMS: Highly polished stems with force-closed design have shown satisfactory clinical results despite being related to relatively high early migration. It has been suggested that the minimal thickness of cement mantles surrounding the femoral stem should be 2 mm to 4 mm to avoid aseptic loosening. The line-to-line cementing technique of the femoral stem, designed to achieve stem press-fit, challenges this opinion. We compared the migration of a highly polished stem with force-closed design by standard and line-to-line cementing to investigate whether differences in early migration of the stems occur in a clinical study. METHODS: In this single-blind, randomized controlled, clinical radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study, the migration pattern of the cemented Corail hip stem was compared between line-to-line and standard cementing in 48 arthroplasties. The primary outcome measure was femoral stem migration in terms of rotation and translation around and along with the X-, Y-, and Z- axes measured using model-based RSA at three, 12, and 24 months. A linear mixed-effects model was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results from mixed model analyses revealed a lower mean retroversion for line-to-line (0.72° (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38° to 1.07°; p < 0.001), but no significant differences in subsidence between the techniques (-0.15 mm (95% CI -0.53 to 0.227; p = 0.429) at 24 months. Radiolucent lines measuring < 2 mm wide were found in three and five arthroplasties cemented by the standard and line-to-line method, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cemented Corail stem with a force-closed design seems to settle earlier and better with the line-to-line cementing method, although for subsidence the difference was not significant. However, the lower rate of migration into retroversion may reduce the wear and cement deformation, contributing to good long-term fixation and implant survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):19-26.

Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.

BACKGROUND: Modular necks in hip arthroplasty allow variations in neck-shaft angles, neck version and neck lengths and have been introduced to improve accuracy when reconstructing the anatomy and hip joint biomechanics. Periprosthetic bone resorption may be a consequence of stress shielding in the proximal femur after implantation of a femoral stem. The purpose of this study was to investigate the deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem coupled to different modular necks in human cadaver femurs. METHODS: A cementless femoral stem was implanted in twelve human cadaver femurs and tested in a hip simulator corresponding to single leg stance and stair climbing activity with patient-specific loading. The stems were tested with four different modular necks; long, short, retro and varus. The long neck was used as reference in statistical comparisons, as it can be considered the "standard" neck. The deformation of bone during loading was measured by strain gauge rosettes at three levels of the proximal femur on the medial, lateral and anterior side. FINDINGS: The cortical strains were overall reduced on the medial and lateral side of femur, for all implants tested, and in both loading conditions compared to the unoperated femur. Although there were statistical significant differences between the necks, the results did not show a consistent pattern considering which neck retained or lost most strain. In general the differences were small, with the highest significant difference between the necks of 3.23 percentage points. INTERPRETATION: The small differences of strain between the modular necks tested in this study are not expected to influence bone remodeling in the proximal femur.

Initial stability of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.

BACKGROUND: Uncemented implants are dependent upon initial postoperative stability to gain bone ingrowth and secondary stability. The possibility to vary femoral offset and neck angles using modular necks in total hip arthroplasty increases the flexibility in the reconstruction of the geometry of the hip joint. The purpose of this study was to investigate and evaluate initial stability of an uncemented stem coupled to four different modular necks. METHODS: A cementless femoral stem was implanted in twelve human cadaver femurs and tested in a hip simulator with patient specific load for each patient corresponding to single leg stance and stair climbing activity. The stems were tested with four different modular necks; long, short, retro and varus. The long neck was used as reference in statistical comparisons. A micromotion jig was used to measure bone-implant movements, at two predefined levels. FINDINGS: A femoral stem coupled to a varus neck had the highest value of micromotion measured for stair climbing at the distal measurement level (60µm). The micromotions measured with varus and retro necks were significantly larger than motions observed with the reference modular neck, P<0.001. INTERPRETATION: The femoral stem evaluated in this study showed acceptable micromotion values for the investigated loading conditions when coupled to modular necks with different lengths, versions and neck-shaft angles.