Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 86(6): 595-601, 2000 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10980207

ABSTRACT

Although over 1 million procedures are performed in cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs) annually, little comparative data exist on costs or resource use in these settings. In this study, data from 70 CCLs were used to profile CCL times and total direct costs for 2 high-volume procedures: left heart catheterization (LHC) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with or without stent placement. In total, 70,677 consecutive patient examinations for a 12-month period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 were analyzed. For LHC mean total direct costs averaged $306, whereas for PTCA catheterization laboratory costs averaged $3,172. The average total times for these procedures were 63 and 108 minutes, respectively. Seventy-two percent of the PTCA patients underwent coronary stenting with an associated incremental cost of $1,244. By multivariate linear regression, baseline patient characteristics such as age, gender, and clinical factors had little impact on total time and total costs. The major determinants of CCL time and cost were procedural factors (e.g., number and type of interventions) and in-lab complications, including profound hypotension, abrupt vessel closure, and emergency bypass surgery. Using facility procedure volume as a proxy for potential economies of scale, we found no relation between CCL volume and total direct CCL costs. There did appear to be a significant inverse relation between facility volume and total procedural time with CCLs that performed the highest volumes of LHC and PTCA procedures saving an average of 5 to 9 minutes per procedure. These findings may be useful in defining specific time and cost benchmarks for these commonly performed procedures and serve to underscore the critical role of reducing complications in both quality improvement and cost-saving efforts.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/economics , Cardiac Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Catheterization/economics , Direct Service Costs/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Care Facilities/economics , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings/economics , Direct Service Costs/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
2.
Am Heart J ; 137(6): 1129-36, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10347342

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To test whether later intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) deflation approaching or simultaneous with left ventricular ejection would improve hemodynamics and myocardial efficiency with the use of new balloon deflation methods, 4 IABP timing techniques were evaluated in 43 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Later balloon deflation produced significantly greater percentage changes in mean aortic pressure (6% vs 1%), systolic pressure time index (-27% vs -20%), diastolic pressure time index (35% vs 19%), and the systolic pressure-time index/diastolic pressure-time index ratio (97% vs 51%), respectively. However, these changes increased peak systolic pressure (-15% vs -11%). Cardiac output and stroke volume indexes were not significantly altered over the 4 settings. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that systemic hemodynamics and myocardial efficiency may be improved by later balloon deflation approaching left ventricular ejection in comparison to conventional IABP timing.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Echocardiography, Doppler/methods , Echocardiography, Doppler/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/instrumentation , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/statistics & numerical data , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , United States
3.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 11(9): 533-42, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10745592

ABSTRACT

Coronary catheterization laboratories (CCLs) are the cornerstones of the delivery system for many cardiovascular procedures performed in the United States. However, few comprehensive data exist benchmarking physician activities in CCLs. This study benchmarks cost and time data on 82,548 consecutive patient encounters in 53 CCLs for the 18-month period of January 1997 through June 1998. The data are compiled from the OEP program, a relational database developed by Boston Scientific/Scimed (Maple Grove, Minnesota) for use in CCLs. CCL productivity (total time and procedure time) and cost (variable costs and device costs) benchmarks are created for: 1) left heart catheterization; 2) right and left heart catheterization; 3) percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA); 4) atherectomy; and 5) coronary stents. Results show the variable costs (those costs that vary in direct proportion to changes in CCL activities) for the five procedures are: $308, left heart catheterization; $395, right and left heart catheterization; $841, PTCA; $2,768, atherectomy; and $3,186, coronary stent. These variable costs are lower than the typical average costs reported for these procedures because they do not include hospital, laboratory, and physician costs, only the procedure-specific activity-related costs most directly controlled and/or influenced by CCL physicians or administrators. The total time for the left heart catheterization averaged 64 minutes and 84 minutes for the right and left heart catheterization, respectively, and procedural times averaged 25 and 32 minutes, respectively. For the major interventional procedures N PTCA, atherectomy, and coronary stents, total times averages were 102, 135, and 117 minutes, respectively. Procedural times for these procedures averaged between 60 and 65 percent of the total time. The major implications of these findings are discussed and limitations noted.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Laboratories/standards , Myocardial Revascularization/standards , Age Factors , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/economics , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/standards , Atherectomy, Coronary/economics , Atherectomy, Coronary/standards , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/standards , Cardiac Catheterization/economics , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/standards , Costs and Cost Analysis , Databases as Topic , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Female , Humans , Laboratories/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization/economics , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Stents , Time Factors
4.
ASAIO Trans ; 37(3): M340-2, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1751177

ABSTRACT

Emergency cardiopulmonary support (CPS) was instituted in 53 consecutive patients for acute life threatening pathologies. Indications for CPS deployment were: cardiac arrest, 60% (n = 32); cardiogenic shock, 20.4% (n = 11), supported angioplasty, 13% (n = 7); and adult respiratory distress syndrome, 5.6% (n = 3). Cardiopulmonary support was successfully deployed in 51 of the 53 patients (96%), resulting in a mean blood pressure greater than or equal to 60 mmHg, CO greater than or equal to 3-5 L/min, and partial pressure of oxygen greater than or equal to 100 mmHg, with venous oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 60%. The average time from arrest to CPS deployment was 40 minutes. Seventy-nine major cardiovascular procedures were done in these 51 patients (average, 1.5/patient). The duration of support ranged from 1 to 75 hrs (mean, 16.1 hrs). Twenty-seven patients (53%) were weaned, 13 successfully (32%), with 11 (85%) surviving greater than 24 hrs, and six (46%), greater than 30 days. The other 24 patients (47%) were transferred to other treatment modalities, including cardiac surgery and bridge-to-transplant ventricular assist devices. Four of these patients died (17%), whereas 20 (83%) survived. Of these survivors, 19 (95%) survived greater than 24 hrs, whereas 11 (55%) survived greater than 30 days. The overall survival using the CPS system is 59% short-term (greater than 24 hrs.), and 33% long-term (greater than 30 days). In conclusion, the CPS system is a potent and effective resuscitative tool. It requires transfer to other treatment modalities for survival in most cases.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/instrumentation , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Arrest/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygenators, Membrane , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...