Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All?

Background: Venous vascular access with higher sheath size is common in interventional electrophysiology. In contrast to arterial vascular access, no dedicated closure devices exist for closure after venous access with higher sheath sizes. The Figure-of-8-Suture, an easy to apply suture, may be as a feasible approach for closure venous puncture. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of closure of femoral venous access. Methods: From November 2016 to February 2018, patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures, closure of left atrial appendage or patent foramen ovale were included. Until May 2017, manual compression was performed to achieve haemostasis at venous access site (control group). From May 2017, patients were treated with a Figure-of-8-Suture (treatment group, Figure 1). Turnaround time and incidence of vascular complications were compared between the two groups. Results: In total, 290 patients were included, 132 in the control group and 158 in the Figure-of-8-Suture group. Hemostasis after sheath removal was achieved in 100% of the cases in the control group by manual compression and in 98.7% of the cases with the Figure-of-8-Suture (p=0.2). Vascular complications were more common in the control group (6.8 vs. 1.3 %, p=0.01). Turnaround time was significantly lower in the Figure-of-8-Suture group (58.6 ± 14 vs. 77 ± 33.9 min, p=0.004). In a sub-analysis in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (Figure-of-8 n=45, controls n=35), vascular complications were significantly more common in the control group (9.4 vs 0%, p=0.045). Conclusion: The Figure-of-8-Suture is an easy-to-apply, effective approach for venous closure after electrophysiological procedures.

[Radiation reduction in interventional electrophysiology : Results from operators with different levels of experience]. / Strahlenreduktion in der interventionellen Elektrophysiologie : Verlaufsdaten bei Untersuchern mit unterschiedlicher Erfahrung.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure in the catherization laboratory is associated with significant health risks. It is unclear whether a reduction of radiation exposure with the use of "near-zero fluoroscopy" protocols is possible when applied by less experienced operators. METHODS: Consecutive ablation procedures with the use of a 3D mapping system were analyzed. Three time periods were analyzed. During the first period (standard), no specific radiation-reduction protocol was used. During the second period (initial phase of radiation reduction) a near "near-zero fluoroscopy" protocol was implemented; however, the majority of procedures were performed by an expert. During the third period (routine use of radiation reduction), less experienced operators (fellow and beginner) performed a growing number of procedures with the "near-zero fluoroscopy" protocol. RESULTS: In all, 290 procedures were analyzed. After implementation of a radiation-reduced protocol, a significant reduction of radiation exposure was observed (standard 850 ± 831.7 vs. initial phase 197.2 ± 481.8 µGy/m2, p < 0.001, and vs. routine use 283 ± 493.8 µGy/m2, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the initial phase and routine phase (p = 1). Over the three periods, the proportion of procedures performed by less experienced operators grew significantly for complex (fellow: 0% vs. 10% vs. 30%; p < 0.001) and noncomplex procedures (fellow: 30% vs. 39% vs. 49%; beginner: 15% vs. 38% vs. 34%; p = 0.002). Complication rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a radiation-reduced protocol leads to a significant reduction of radiation exposure even in less experienced operators during training.