Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
CNS Spectr ; 24(4): 380-389, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29866212

ABSTRACT

IntroductionDespite consistently high discontinuation rates due to withdrawal of consent (WOC) and insufficient therapeutic effect (ITE) in schizophrenia trials, insight into the underlying factors contributing to poor satisfaction with treatment and dropout is limited. A better understanding of these factors could help to improve trial design and completion rates. METHODS: Using data from 1,136 trial participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, we explored associations between predictor variables with (1) dropout due to WOC and ITE and (2) satisfaction with treatment among patients and investigators by means of hierarchic multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: ITE was associated with poor clinical improvement, poor investigator satisfaction with treatment, and poor patient insight into their own disease, whereas WOC only showed a meaningful association with poor patient satisfaction with treatment. Investigator satisfaction with treatment appeared most strongly associated with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive factor endpoint scores, whereas patient satisfaction with treatment was best predicted by the endpoint score on the PANSS emotional distress factor. The occurrence of severe side effects showed no meaningful association to satisfaction with treatment among investigators and patients, and neither did a patient's experienced psychopathology, nor their self-rating of functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas trial discontinuation due to ITE is associated with poor treatment effectiveness, a patient's decision to withdraw from an antipsychotic trial remains unpredictable and may occur even when the investigator observes a global clinical improvement and is satisfied with the treatment.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Informed Consent/psychology , Informed Consent/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medication Adherence/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenic Psychology
2.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 38(9): 2427-35, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25257291

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Org 25935 is a glycine transporter inhibitor that increases extracellular glycine levels and attenuates alcohol-induced dopaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens. In animal models, Org 25935 has dose-dependent effects on ethanol intake, preference, and relapse-like behavior without tolerance. The current study aimed to translate these animal findings to humans by examining whether Org 25935 prevents relapse in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adult patients diagnosed with alcohol dependence were randomly assigned to receive Org 25935 12 mg twice a day or placebo for 84 days. The primary end point was percentage heavy drinking days (defined as ≥ 5 standard drinks per day for men and ≥ 4 for women). Secondary end points included other measures of relapse-related drinking behavior (e.g., drinks per day, time to relapse), as well as measures of global functioning, alcohol-related thoughts and cravings, and motivation. RESULTS: A total of 140 subjects were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The trial was stopped approximately midway after a futility analysis showing that the likelihood of detecting a signal at study term was <40%. There was no significant difference between Org 25935 and placebo on percentage heavy drinking days or any other measure of relapse-related drinking behavior. Org 25935 showed no safety issues and was fairly well tolerated, with fatigue, dizziness, and transient visual events as the most commonly occurring side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Org 25935 demonstrated no benefit over placebo in preventing alcohol relapse. Study limitations and implications are discussed.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Secondary Prevention , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/therapeutic use , Adult , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue/chemically induced , Fatigue/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Secondary Prevention/methods , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/adverse effects , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/chemistry , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 34(2): 190-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24525661

ABSTRACT

Using a selective glycine uptake inhibitor as adjunctive to second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) was hypothesized to ameliorate negative and/or cognitive symptoms in subjects with schizophrenia. Subjects with predominant persistent negative symptoms (previously stabilized ≥3 months on an SGA) were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate adjunctive treatment with Org 25935, a selective inhibitor of type 1 glycine transporter, over 12 weeks in a flexible dose design. Org 25935 was tested at 4 to 8 mg twice daily and 12 to 16 mg twice daily versus placebo. Primary efficacy outcome was mean change from baseline in Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms composite score. Secondary efficacy end points were Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and subscale scores, depressive symptoms (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia), global functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning scale), and cognitive measures using a computerized battery (Central Nervous System Vital Signs). Responder rates were assessed post hoc. A total of 215 subjects were randomized, of which 187 (87%) completed the trial. Both dose groups of Org 25935 did not differ significantly from placebo on Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (total or subscale scores), Global Assessment of Functioning, or the majority of tested cognitive domains. Org 25935 was generally well tolerated within the tested dose range, with no meaningful effects on extrapyramidal symptoms and some reports of reversible visual adverse effects. Org 25935 did not differ significantly from placebo in reducing negative symptoms or improving cognitive functioning when administered as adjunctive treatment to SGA. In our study population, Org 25935 appeared to be well tolerated in the tested dose ranges.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenic Psychology , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/administration & dosage , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/adverse effects , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
AAPS J ; 13(1): 121-30, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21184291

ABSTRACT

For currently available antipsychotic drugs, blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors is a critical component for achieving antipsychotic efficacy, but it is also a driving factor in the development of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). To inform the clinical development of asenapine, generic mathematical models have been developed for predicting antipsychotic efficacy and EPS tolerability based on D(2) receptor occupancy. Clinical data on pharmacokinetics, D(2) receptor occupancy, efficacy, and EPS for several antipsychotics were collected from the public domain. Asenapine data were obtained from in-house trials. D(2) receptor occupancy data were restricted to published positron emission tomography studies that included blood sampling for pharmacokinetics. Clinical efficacy data were restricted to group mean endpoint data from short-term placebo-controlled trials, whereas EPS evaluation also included some non-placebo-controlled trials. A generally applicable model connecting antipsychotic dose, pharmacokinetics, D(2) receptor occupancy, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) response, and effect on Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) was then developed. The empirical models describing the D(2)-PANSS and D(2)-SAS relationships were used successfully to aid dose selection for asenapine phase II and III trials. A broader use can be envisaged as a dose selection tool for new antipsychotics with D(2) antagonist properties in the treatment of schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Basal Ganglia Diseases/chemically induced , Receptors, Dopamine D2/drug effects , Algorithms , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Basal Ganglia Diseases/physiopathology , Biological Availability , Biomarkers , Computer Simulation , Dibenzocycloheptenes , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Endpoint Determination , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/adverse effects , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/pharmacokinetics , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/therapeutic use , Humans , Models, Statistical , Positron-Emission Tomography , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Receptors, Dopamine D2/metabolism , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Schizophrenic Psychology , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...