Improving rural and remote practitioners' knowledge of the diabetic foot: findings from an educational intervention.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine knowledge of national guidelines for diabetic foot assessment and risk stratification by rural and remote healthcare professionals in Western Australia and their implementation in practice. Assessment of diabetic foot knowledge, availability of equipment and delivery of foot care education in a primary healthcare setting at baseline enabled evaluation of the effectiveness of a diabetic foot education and training program for generalist healthcare professionals. METHODS: This study employed a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study design. Healthcare practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practice of diabetic foot assessment, diabetic foot risks, risk stratification, and use of the 2011 National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines were investigated with an electronic pre-test survey(.) Healthcare professionals then undertook a 3-h education and training workshop before completing the electronic post-test knowledge, attitudes and practice survey. Comparison of pre-test/post-test survey findings was used to assess the change in knowledge, attitudes and intended practice due to the workshops. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six healthcare professionals from two rural and remote health regions of Western Australia participated in training workshops. Monofilaments and diabetes foot care education brochures, particularly brochures for Aboriginal people, were reported as not readily available in rural and remote health services. For most participants (58 %), their post-test knowledge score increased significantly from the pre-test score. Use of the Guidelines in clinical settings was low (19 %). The healthcare professionals' baseline diabetic foot knowledge was adequate to correctly identify the high risk category. However, stratification of the intermediate risk category was poor, even after training. CONCLUSION: This study reports the first assessment of Western Australia's rural and remote health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the diabetic foot. It shows that without training, generalists' levels of knowledge concerning the diabetic foot was low and they were unlikely to assess foot risk. The findings from this study in a rural and remote setting cast doubt on the ability of generalist healthcare professionals to stratify risk appropriately, especially for those at intermediate risk, without clinical decision support tools.

Clinical decision support software for diabetic foot risk stratification: development and formative evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Identifying people at risk of developing diabetic foot complications is a vital step in prevention programs in primary healthcare settings. Diabetic foot risk stratification systems predict foot ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of potential end users during development and formative evaluations of an electronic diabetic foot risk stratification tool based on evidence-based guidelines and determine the accuracy of the tool. METHODS: Formative evaluation of the risk tool occurred in five stages over an eight-month period and employed a mixed methods research design consisting of semi-structured interviews, focus group and participant observation, online survey, expert review, comparison to the Australian Guidelines and clinical testing. RESULTS: A total of 43 healthcare practitioners trialled the computerised clinical decision support system during development, with multiple software changes made as a result of feedback. Individual and focus group participants exposed critical design flaws. Live testing revealed risk stratification errors and functional limitations providing the basis for practical improvements. In the final product, all risk calculations and recommendations made by the clinical decision support system reflect current Australian Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the computerised clinical decision support system using evidence-based guidelines can be optimised by a multidisciplinary iterative process of feedback, testing and software adaptation by experts in modern development technologies.

Temporal trends in initial and recurrent lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Western Australia from 2000 to 2010.

AIMS: To examine temporal trends in lower extremity amputations in people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) without diabetes in Western Australia (WA) from 2000 to 2010. METHODS: We used linked health data to identify all non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in adults aged ≥20 years with diabetes and/or CVD from 2000 to 2010 in WA. Annual age- and sex-standardised rates of total, initial and recurrent amputations, stratified by major and minor status, were calculated for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and CVD without diabetes, from the at-risk population for each group. Age- and sex-adjusted trends were estimated from Poisson regression models. RESULTS: 5891 lower extremity amputations were identified. Peripheral vascular disease (71%), hypertension (70%) and chronic kidney disease (60%) were highly prevalent. Average annual rates of total amputations were 724, 564 and 66 per 100,000 person-years in type 1, type 2 diabetes and CVD without diabetes respectively. Rates of initial amputations fell significantly by 2.4%/year (95% CI -3.5, -1.4) in type 2 diabetes, with similar declines for type 1 diabetes and CVD without diabetes (interaction p=0.96), driven by large falls in major amputations. There was limited improvement in recurrence rates overall, with recurrent minor amputations increasing significantly in type 2 diabetes (+3.5%/year, 95% CI +1.3%, +5.7%). CONCLUSION: Lower extremity amputation rates have declined at a population level in people with diabetes and CVD without diabetes, suggesting improvements in prevention and management for this high-risk patient group, however limited declines in recurrent amputations requires further investigation.