Clinically meaningful changes in functional performance resulting from self-directed interventions in individuals with arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical meaningfulness of changes observed in functional performance from two self-directed interventions targeting adults with arthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants (n = 312) were randomized to a 12-week self-directed exercise or nutrition intervention. Objective measures of functional performance (6-minute walk, seated reach, grip strength, 30-second chair stand, gait speed, balance) were obtained at baseline, 12 weeks, and nine months. Minimally (≥0.20 standard deviation) and substantially (≥0.50) meaningful changes in functional performance were examined. Changes in the percent 'impaired' and at risk for losing independence using established standards, and associations between physical activity and impairment/risk status were also examined. Group × Time interactions were not significant; therefore groups were combined in all analyses. RESULTS: Minimally (31-71%) and substantially (13-54%) meaningful changes in function were shown. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of participants 'impaired' on the 30-second chair stand (both time points) and gait speed (nine months). The percentage of participants at risk for losing independence significantly decreased for the 30-second chair stand (both time points) and the 6-minute walk (nine months). Those engaging in ≥2 h of leisure-time physical activity were significantly less likely to be impaired on the 6-minute walk, 30-second chair stand, and gait speed at 12 weeks, and the 6-minute walk at nine months. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that can slow functional declines, and ideally result in clinically meaningful improvements in functional performance among adults with arthritis are needed. Meaningful improvements in various indicators of functional performance can result from self-directed exercise and nutrition programs. These types of programs have the potential for wide-spread dissemination, and thus broad reach.

Baseline predictors of physical activity in a sample of adults with arthritis participating in a self-directed exercise program.

OBJECTIVES: To examine baseline predictors of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) at the 12-week follow-up in a sample of adults with arthritis participating in a self-directed, multicomponent exercise program. STUDY DESIGN: Pretest-posttest. Analyses were limited to those randomized to the exercise intervention. METHODS: Participants (n = 152) completed a survey assessing demographic, health-related, and arthritis-related factors, and completed anthropometric and functional measurements at baseline. Self-reported MVPA was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. Participants were classified as engaging in ≥2.5 or <2.5 h/week of MVPA at the 12-week follow-up. Baseline demographic, health-related, arthritis-related, and functional factors were examined as predictors of engaging in ≥2.5 h of MVPA. RESULTS: At the 12-week follow-up, 66.5% (n = 101) of participants engaged in ≥2.5 h/week of MVPA. Those with a higher body mass index, more days with poor physical health, a greater number of health conditions, self-reported hypertension, self-reported high cholesterol, and greater pain and stiffness were less likely to engage in ≥2.5 h of MVPA at the 12-week follow-up; those with greater arthritis self-efficacy and better performance on the 6 minute walk test were more likely. None of the other factors examined were associated with MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered health-related, arthritis-related, and functional factors associated with MVPA that may help guide intervention strategies. Participants with less severe symptoms, better functional performance and fewer comorbidities at baseline were more likely to achieve the recommended MVPA level at 12 weeks; therefore self-directed PA interventions may be best suited for those with relatively good health status despite arthritis, while those with worse symptoms and health status may benefit more from other intervention delivery modalities such as structured, individualized programs where additional support for managing arthritis symptoms and comorbidity can be addressed.

The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat): a single categorical item sensitive to physical activity changes in overweight/obese women.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is essential for chronic disease prevention, yet <40% of overweight/obese adults meet the national activity recommendations. For time-efficient counseling, clinicians need a brief, easy-to-use tool that reliably and validly assesses a full range of activity levels, and, most importantly, is sensitive to clinically meaningful changes in activity. The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat) is a single item comprising six descriptive categories ranging from inactive to very active. This novel methodological approach assesses national activity recommendations as well as multiple clinically relevant categories below and above the recommendations, and incorporates critical methodological principles that enhance psychometrics (reliability, validity and sensitivity to change). METHODS: We evaluated the L-Cat's psychometrics among 267 overweight/obese women who were asked to meet the national activity recommendations in a randomized behavioral weight-loss trial. RESULTS: The L-Cat had excellent test-retest reliability (κ=0.64, P<0.001) and adequate concurrent criterion validity; each L-Cat category at 6 months was associated with 1059 more daily pedometer steps (95% CI 712-1407, ß=0.38, P<0.001) and 1.9% greater initial weight loss at 6 months (95% CI -2.4 to -1.3, ß=-0.38, P<0.001). Of interest, L-Cat categories differentiated from each other in a dose-response gradient for steps and weight loss (Ps<0.05) with excellent face validity. The L-Cat was sensitive to change in response to the trial's activity component. Women increased one L-Cat category at 6 months (M=1.0±1.4, P<0.001); 55.8% met the recommendations at 6 months whereas 20.6% did at baseline (P<0.001). Even among women not meeting the recommendations at both baseline and 6 months (n=106), women who moved 1 L-Cat categories at 6 months lost more weight than those who did not (M=-4.6%, 95% CI -6.7 to -2.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given strong psychometrics, the L-Cat has timely potential for clinical use such as tracking activity changes via electronic medical records, especially among overweight/obese populations who are unable or unlikely to reach national recommendations.