Barriers to screening sexually active adolescent women for chlamydia: a survey of primary care physicians.

PURPOSE: To determine the proportion of primary care physicians who screen sexually active teenage women for chlamydia and to determine demographic factors, practice characteristics, and attitudes associated with chlamydia screening. METHODS: We obtained a random sample of 1600 Pennsylvania physicians from the American Medical Association masterfile, stratified to include at least 40% women and equal numbers of family physicians, internists, obstetricians/gynecologists, and pediatricians. In January 1998, physicians received mailed questionnaires; nonrespondents received two follow-up mailings. Physician characteristics associated with chlamydia screening were determined using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Only one-third of physicians responded that they would screen asymptomatic, sexually active teenage women for chlamydia during a routine gynecologic examination. In multivariate analysis, physicians were significantly (p <.05) more likely to screen if they were female (43% vs. 24%), worked in a clinic versus solo practice (60% vs. 18%), worked in a metropolitan location (46% vs. 26%), or had a patient population > or = 20% African-American (54% vs. 25%). Attitudes associated with screening included the belief that most 18-year-old women in their practice were sexually active (36% vs. 12%), feeling responsible for providing information about the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases to their patients (42% vs. 21%), or knowing that screening for chlamydia prevents pelvic inflammatory disease (37% vs. 13%). Physicians were less likely to screen if they believed that the prevalence of chlamydia was low (10% vs. 41%). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of physicians do not adhere to recommended chlamydia screening practices for teenage women. Interventions to improve chlamydia screening might target physicians who are male, in private practice, or who practice in rural areas, and should focus on increasing awareness of the prevalence of chlamydia and benefits of screening.

Physician gender and psychosocial care for children: attitudes, practice characteristics, identification, and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences by physician gender in the identification and treatment of childhood psychosocial problems. DESIGN: Survey of patients (n = 19,963) and physicians (n = 366) in primary care offices in 2 large, practice-based research networks. Multivariate regressions were used to control for patient, physician, and visit characteristics, with a correction for the clustered sample. SUBJECTS: Children ages 4 to 15 years seen consecutively for nonemergent care. MEASURES: Physician report of attitudes, training, practice factors, and identification and treatment of psychosocial problems. Parental report of demographics and behavioral symptoms. RESULTS: Compared with male physicians, female physicians were less likely to view care for psychosocial problems as burdensome. They were more likely to see children who were female, younger, black or Hispanic, in single-parent households, enrolled in public or managed health plans, and with physical health limitations. Children seen by male physicians had higher symptom counts. Male physicians were more likely to report having primary care responsibility for their patient and that parents agree with their care plan. Female physicians spent more time with patients. After controlling for these differences, female physicians did not differ from male physicians in identification or treatment of childhood psychosocial problems. CONCLUSIONS: Male and female physicians see different kinds of children for different visit purposes and have different kinds of relationships with their patients. After controlling for these factors, management of childhood psychosocial problems does not differ by physician gender. Improving management of psychosocial conditions depends on identifying modifiable factors that affect diagnosis and treatment; our work suggests that characteristics of the practice environment, physician-patient relationship, and patient self-selection deserve more research.

Effect of different recruitment sources on the composition of a bipolar disorder case registry.

BACKGROUND: Conducting research on low-prevalence conditions presents an ongoing challenge for clinical and services researchers. Recruitment through health professionals versus other forms of self-referral may affect study group composition. METHODS: We compared members of a voluntary case registry for bipolar disorder who were recruited through a variety of sources including health professionals, support groups, an Internet website, and mailings, brochures, and other general public relations activities. We also compared the cost of recruitment methods. We hypothesized that self-referred registry members would be of higher socioeconomic status and less likely to be in treatment compared to members recruited through health professionals. RESULTS: Registrants referred through the Internet and patient support groups were better educated and more likely to be married than other registrants. However, Internet registrants were younger, had fewer lifetime hospitalizations and were more likely to be working. Nearly all registrants were in treatment with a psychiatrist. Local registrants were predominantly recruited through health professionals and public presentations. Registrants outside of the local region most often learned about the registry from patient support groups and the Internet. Local registrants were less likely to be using non-lithium mood stabilizers. Recruitment through public relations efforts was the most expensive method of recruitment, and the Internet website was the cheapest. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse recruitment methods can expand the population available for clinical trials. For services research, the Internet and patient support groups are less expensive ways to identify persons served in diverse settings and health plans, but these recruitment methods yield a sample that is better educated than the remainder of the population. It remains a difficult task to identify minorities and persons not in treatment.

Locating a health advocate in a private obstetrics/gynecology office increases patient's receipt of preventive recommendations.

This study was performed to determine if adding a health advocate (HA) to the care team for postmenopausal women increased the number of women for whom the physician recommended screening tests or prevention strategies: cholesterol level, mammography, depression counseling, smoking cessation, or weight reduction. The study took place in two locations of a private obstetrician-gynecologist practice. In one location, an HA reviewed screening forms and counseled women about preventive services recommended by the physician. In the second location, women completed the screening form, but treatment occurred as usual. Women were eligible if they were postmenopausal or age 50 or over and were being seen for preventive care. A total of 210 postmenopausal women were screened. Women who were screened when the HA was present (n = 85) did not differ from women screened at the intervention location when the HA was not present (n = 68) or screened at a second practice location (n = 57) in the prevalence of risk factors. Women were significantly more likely to receive indicated preventive recommendations when the HA was present (24% versus 73%, p < 0.001). For breast cancer screening, nearly all women screened when the HA was present received a referral compared to about one third of women screened when the HA was not present (OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.8-5.2). Women are more likely to receive recommendations based on screening data when ancillary staff are available to assist in patient education and referral and to encourage physician recommendations. Further work is needed to identify cost-effective methods for supporting physicians' preventive care efforts.

Women's satisfaction with primary care: a new measurement effort from the PHS National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.

This paper describes efforts by the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health to develop a woman-specific primary care satisfaction instrument suitable for quality improvement and research.

A fork in the road: decision time for behavioral pediatrics.

The rapid growth of managed care, and especially that of managed behavioral healthcare organizations (MBHOs), is likely to diminish the role of developmental-behavioral pediatrics and separate care for medical and behavioral problems. Thus, a rethinking of the practice of developmental-behavioral pediatrics is required. This study reviews the structure of MBHOs, identifies barriers to the provision of services by developmental-behavioral pediatricians, describes alternative practice models for consideration, and makes recommendations. The aims of the recommendations are to stimulate an active discussion about these issues, spark an advocacy effort, and ensure the continued participation of developmental-behavioral pediatricians in the care of children with special needs. The study concludes that managed care will push developmental-behavioral pediatricians into integration with primary care group practices or into specialty mental health networks. Immediate discussion, action, and advocacy will be required to ensure a presence in these decisions for developmental-behavioral pediatricians.

Physical abuse among depressed women.

OBJECTIVE: To provide estimates of physical abuse and use of health services among depressed women in order to inform efforts to increase detection and treatment of physical abuse. DESIGN: Retrospective assessment of abuse and health services use over 1 year in a cohort of depressed women. SETTING: Statewide community sample from Arkansas. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 303 depressed women through random-digit-dial screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Exposure to physical abuse based on the Conflict Tactics Scale, multi-informant estimate of health and mental health services. Over half of the depressed women (55.2%) reported experiencing physical abuse as adults, with 14.5% reporting abuse during the study year. Women abused as adults had significantly more severe depressive symptoms, more psychiatric comorbidity, and more physical illnesses than nonabused women. After controlling for sociodemographic and severity-of-illness factors, recently abused, depressed women were much less likely to receive outpatient care for mental health problems as compared to other depressed women (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; p = .013), though they were more likely to receive health care for physical problems (OR 5.7, p = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Because nearly all depressed women experiencing abuse sought general medical rather than mental health care during the year of the study, primary care screening for physical abuse appears to be a critical link to professional help for abused, depressed women. Research is needed to inform primary care guidelines about methods for detecting abuse in depressed women.

The effects of mental health factors on ambulatory care visits by rural teens.

This study sought to determine the effects of mental health variables on rural adolescents' use of ambulatory health care services and whether these effects varied across common outpatient settings. Using a cross-sectional survey design, 2,297 adolescents who attended public schools in grades 7 through 12 in one isolated rural Mississippi River Delta county were assessed via a standardized health behavior survey. This self-report measure inquired about relevant health behaviors such as alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and health service use. The students' mean age was 15 years and 58 percent of the sample were black. Approximately 11 percent of the sample reported symptoms of depression, 16.5 percent reported problem drinking, and slightly fewer than 6 percent reported both. After controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need factors, the reporting of depressive symptoms, problem drinking, or both was related to an increased number of outpatient visits in three of four sites examined. However, differences among sites were observed. These data suggest that mental health problems are associated with increased visits to ambulatory settings, and these problems affect service use differentially. Thus, effective interventions and better linkages between ambulatory settings and mental health providers may reduce unnecessary use.

Quality assessment: is the focus on providers or on patients?

Most studies of ambulatory care quality are based on chart reviews of episodes of care in single settings, rather than on care received by a patient over time and across settings. The purpose of this study was to compare ambulatory care quality scores based on information from the usual source of care to scores based on information from all providers seen during a year. The quality of well child care for 55 two-year-olds and asthma care for 70 children and adults continuously enrolled in the Maryland Medicaid program throughout 1988 was assessed. Combining data from multiple providers changed quality scores in both directions. For well child care, quality scores generally improved because of an increased opportunity to perform desirable actions, such as lead screening. However, quality scores for asthma care generally decreased because undesirable clinician actions, such as the failure to document follow-up plans, increased as more problems were uncovered. Thus, the findings of quality assessments differ according to whether the focus is on care delivered by individual providers or on care received by patients. The direction of the difference will depend upon whether the indicators of quality represent omission of recommended care or commission of improper care.

Clinical effect of a quality assurance system for radiographs in a pediatric emergency department.

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical relevance and effectiveness of a quality assurance system used to identify discordant x-ray interpretations between emergency department pediatricians and pediatric radiologists in the emergency department of a large pediatric hospital. Of 5862 patients who underwent 8174 radiographic studies during a one year period, 286 patients with discordant radiographic diagnoses were identified. The incidence of discordant radiograph interpretation was determined to be 3.5% (286/8174 studies). Of those patients with discordant diagnoses, 11.5% (33/286 discordant diagnoses) received immediate intervention by the emergency department, 64.0% (183) received subsequent intervention at their follow-up appointment or by the inpatient team caring for them, 9.4% (27) required no intervention, and 15.0% (43) had no evidence of necessary intervention documented on their medical record. While only 33/5862 (0.6%) patients receiving radiographs after routine working hours required immediate intervention by the emergency department, this intervention was potentially lifesaving. No adverse outcomes were identified in this group of patients who did not receive immediate interpretation of their radiographs by a radiologist. When 24-hour in-house radiology coverage is not provided, a quality assurance system that recalls patients identified with discordant radiographic diagnoses, who may require a change in management, appears to be an effective method of patient management only when discordant interpretations are identified and promptly acted upon.

Health status of preterm low-birth-weight infants. Comparison of maternal reports.

BACKGROUND: Developers of measures of child health status have documented acceptable reliability and some validity, but less attention has been paid to the concurrent and predictive validity of these measures. METHODS: We examined the concurrent and predictive validity of the RAND General Health Rating Index, the Stein-Jessop Functional Status II-R, and the mother's global assessment of her child's health on a 5-point scale, in a sample of preterm low-birth-weight children (n = 608) who were followed up as controls in the Infant Health and Development Program. We compared maternal-reported measures assessed at 24 months with other measures of growth, morbidity, functioning, and health care utilization assessed concurrently and at 36 months in bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: After controlling for other factors, the RAND General Health Rating Index and the Stein-Jessop Functional Status II-R were unrelated to the growth, utilization, or functioning measures. The RAND General Health Rating Index was significantly, but weakly, related to future morbidity. The mother's global perception of health was significantly related to outpatient utilization and behavior problems. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may find that maternal assessment of overall child health is a sensitive but nonspecific indicator of the mother's concern. For researchers, none of these measures seems likely to serve as a proxy for health care utilization or morbidity in studies of other phenomena, or as an indicator of detailed health outcomes.

Costs vs quality in different types of primary care settings.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between efficiency in use of resources and quality of care provided by physicians serving as the usual source of care for patients in a state Medicaid program. DESIGN: Retrospective quality-of-care review of 2024 outpatient medical records of 135 providers sampled from system-wide Medicaid claims data in Maryland. SUBJECTS: Providers in three types of practice settings (hospital outpatient clinic, community health center, and physician's office) were stratified into three case mix-adjusted resource use groups (high, medium, and low). A sample of patients with the diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, asthma, well-child care, or otitis media were identified from Medicaid claims forms from visits during 1988. Case mix was controlled by the application of the ambulatory care groups, a method that characterizes populations according to their burden of morbidity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nurses from the local peer review organization audited medical records using explicit criteria for quality of care in several categories: evidence of impaired access, evidence of compromised technical quality, evidence of inappropriate care, outcome of care, and several generic indicators of quality. Well-adult care was assessed for patients with the adult diagnoses. RESULTS: Although there were some systematic differences by type of facility in some aspects of quality of care (more access problems for patients in hospital clinics and more technical quality problems for patients in office-based practice), there were no consistent differences in quality of care overall for patients in different types of settings and no consistent relationships between cost-efficiency and quality of care. However, patients in medium-cost community health centers had the best or second best scores for most of the 21 comparisons of type of quality assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care provided for common conditions in primary care is not associated with costs generated by providers. Policies directed toward the choice of low-cost vs high-cost providers will not necessarily lead to a deterioration in the quality of care. States can both improve quality and lower costs by consistent monitoring of programs over time. The finding of generally higher quality of care for patients in medium-cost community health centers deserves further study.