Impact of protein supplementation after bariatric surgery: A randomized controlled double-blind pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Bariatric patients are at risk of protein deficiency. The aim of this study was to determine possible benefits of postoperative protein supplementation weight reduction, body composition, and protein status. METHODS: Twenty obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery were randomized either to the protein (PRO) group, which received a daily protein supplement over 6 months postoperatively, or to the control (CON) group, which received an isocaloric placebo in a double-blind fashion. Data on protein and energy intake, body weight, body composition, blood proteins, and grip force was collected preinterventionally and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In both groups body weight was significantly reduced to a similar extent (after 6 months: PRO group 25.4 ± 7.2%, CON group 20.9 ± 3.9%; intergroup comparison P > 0.05). Protein intake was steadily increased in the PRO group, but not in the CON group, and reached maximum at month 6 (25.4 ± 3.7% of energy intake versus 15.8 ± 4.4%; P < 0.001). In the PRO group, body fat mass loss was higher than that in the CON group (79% of absolute weight loss versus 73%; P = 0.02) while lean body mass loss was less pronounced (21% versus 27%, P = 0.05). Blood proteins and grip force did not differ at any time point between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that protein supplementation after bariatric surgery improves body composition by enhancing loss of body fat mass and reducing loss of lean body mass within the 6 months follow up.

Effects of surgical and dietary weight loss therapy for obesity on gut microbiota composition and nutrient absorption.

Evidence suggests a correlation between the gut microbiota composition and weight loss caused by caloric restriction. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a surgical intervention for obesity, is classified as predominantly restrictive procedure. In this study we investigated functional weight loss mechanisms with regard to gut microbial changes and energy harvest induced by LSG and a very low calorie diet in ten obese subjects (n = 5 per group) demonstrating identical weight loss during a follow-up period of six months. For gut microbiome analysis next generation sequencing was performed and faeces were analyzed for targeted metabolomics. The energy-reabsorbing potential of the gut microbiota decreased following LSG, indicated by the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio, but increased during diet. Changes in butyrate-producing bacterial species were responsible for the Firmicutes changes in both groups. No alteration of faecal butyrate was observed, but the microbial capacity for butyrate fermentation decreased following LSG and increased following dietetic intervention. LSG resulted in enhanced faecal excretion of nonesterified fatty acids and bile acids. LSG, but not dietetic restriction, improved the obesity-associated gut microbiota composition towards a lean microbiome phenotype. Moreover, LSG increased malabsorption due to loss in energy-rich faecal substrates and impairment of bile acid circulation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01344525.

Markers of Bone Metabolism in Obese Individuals Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Besides its advantages, bariatric surgery implicates a risk of nutritional deficiencies, which might result in impaired bone metabolism. We assessed the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on blood markers of bone metabolism in obese patients during a 3-year observation period. METHODS: In 39 obese patients (29 women, 10 men, mean BMI 51.8 ± 6.8 kg/m(2)) undergoing LSG, we measured blood concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and N-telopeptides crosslinks (NTx) before LSG and up to 3 years postoperatively. Vitamin D and calcium supplementations were recorded. RESULTS: LSG caused an excess weight loss (EWL) of 54 ± 20 % after 3 years. Before surgery, we found decreased levels of 25(OH)D and calcium in 80 and 5 % of the subjects, respectively, while increased levels of PTH, BAP, and NTx were found in 39, 28, and 21 %, respectively. Mean levels of NTx and the prevalence of elevated levels of NTx increased within 2 years (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01). Neither mean blood concentrations of 25(OH)D, calcium, PTH, and BAP nor relative prevalence of deficiencies regarding these markers changed during the study period. The supplementation rates of calcium and vitamin D increased postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is associated with pronounced changes of markers of bone metabolism; LSG did neither aggravate nor ameliorate vitamin D metabolism within a 3-year time period, but led to increased bone resorption 2 years postoperatively. Routine supplementation of calcium and vitamin D is not likely sufficient to compensate the obesity-associated deficiencies in bone metabolism.