Evaluation and Analysis of Fellow Learning and Education Curriculum in a Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine Fellowship: A Prospective, Observational Pilot Study.

Background: Since 2017, several regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellowship programs throughout the country have developed various educational didactic curriculums to address the core medical knowledge requirements as set by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Given the paucity of existing literature regarding the medical knowledge acquisition of regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellows, this study aimed to determine how quickly these fellows learn during their fellowship year, with a secondary aim of analyzing a new educational didactic curriculum in its goal of delivering the required medical knowledge. Methods: An 89-question, multiple-choice examination was administered to the 2020-2021 regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellows at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center during orientation and again at 4 months and 8 months into the fellowship. A secondary analysis of anonymous deidentified answers was completed. Results: Fellows averaged 64%, 74%, and 79% correct responses on the orientation, 4-month, and 8-month exams, respectively. An analysis of the orientation exam revealed that the most commonly incorrect answers stemmed from topics including lower extremity nerve blocks, truncal blocks, and neuraxial anesthesia. The 4-month exam showed overall marked improvement; however, truncal blocks remained the most missed topic. Topics with 100% correct response rates in all examinations were local anesthetic pharmacology and systemic opioids. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a large portion of learning occurs during the first 4 months of the fellowship and slows thereafter. Using this simple form of fellowship evaluation, changes to an educational didactic curriculum can be implemented to reach medical knowledge goals more effectively and efficiently as required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

Preoperative Pelvic Floor Injections With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone for Pain Control After Vaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that preoperative pelvic floor muscle injections and pudendal nerve blocks with bupivacaine and dexamethasone would decrease postoperative pain after vaginal native tissue prolapse repairs, compared with saline and bupivacaine. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm, double-blind, randomized trial of bilateral transobturator levator ani muscle injections and transvaginal pudendal nerve blocks before vaginal reconstructive and obliterative prolapse procedures (uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament fixation, levator myorrhaphy, or colpocleisis). Women were randomized to one of three study medication groups: 0.9% saline, 0.25% bupivacaine, or combination 0.25% bupivacaine with 4 mg dexamethasone. Our primary outcome was a numeric rating scale pain score on postoperative day 1. Using an analysis of variance evaluated at the two-sided 0.05 significance level, an assumed variance of the means of 0.67, and SD of 1.75, we calculated 21 women per arm to detect a 2-point change on the numeric rating scale (90% power), which we increased to 25 per arm to account for 20% attrition and the use of nonparametric statistical methods. RESULTS: From June 2017 through April 2019, 281 women were screened and 75 (26.7%) were randomized with no differences in baseline demographics among study arms. There was no significant difference in median pain scores on postoperative day 1 among study groups (median [interquartile range] pain score 4.0 [2.0-7.0] for placebo vs 4.0 [2.0-5.5] for bupivacaine vs 4.0 [1.5-5.0] for bupivacaine with dexamethasone, P=.92). CONCLUSION: Preoperative pelvic floor muscle injections and pudendal nerve blocks with bupivacaine and dexamethasone did not improve postoperative pain after vaginal native tissue prolapse procedures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03040011.

Thromboelastography in term neonates.

BACKGROUND: Thromboelastography (TEG) is utilized as a point-of-care test of coagulation function to improve evidence-based blood product replacement in adults. In contrast to standard indices of coagulation, TEG reflects the dynamic interactions among the elements involved in hemostasis, including fibrinolysis. Although normal adult values and various abnormalities have been characterized, normative values for term neonates have not been described. Studies of neonatal TEG remain limited and have small sample sizes with inconsistent methodology. The aim of this study is to provide normative data on healthy term neonates, and to assess the impact of mode of delivery on TEG parameters at term. METHODS: Venous umbilical blood was obtained from the placenta within 10 min of delivery. TEG analysis of citrated kaolin-activated samples was performed for 50 healthy term vaginal and 50 cesarean deliveries. Samples collected for cesarean sections were from scheduled cases or unscheduled ones due to failure of progression of labor. RESULTS: Healthy neonates with uncomplicated vaginal term deliveries resulted in the following TEG parameters: R: 5.41 ± 1.34 (mean ± SD) min; K: 1.62 ± 0.75 min; α-angle: 65.39 ± 8.77°; MA: 65.86 ± 5.81 mm; and LY30: 1.40 ± 1.18%. Results for the cesarean delivery neonatal TEG assays showed: R: 5.51 ± 1.74 (mean ± SD) min; K: 1.52 ± 0.47 min; α-angle: 64.15 ± 4.61°; MA: 64.15 ± 4.61 mm; and LY30: 2.44 ± 3.51%. Of note, no statistical differences were observed (p < .01) between the groups. CONCLUSION: TEG measurements from term neonates were no different when the neonates were delivered vaginally or by cesarean section. Labor had no effect on neonatal TEG levels. Neonatal TEG values may therefore serve as insight for fetal values at the appropriate postconceptional age.

Neurotoxicity of common peripheral nerve block adjuvants.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review outlines the analgesic role of perineural adjuvants for local anesthetic nerve block injections, and evaluates current knowledge regarding whether adjuvants modulate the neurocytologic properties of local anesthetics. RECENT FINDINGS: Perineural adjuvant medications such as dexmedetomidine, clonidine, buprenorphine, dexamethasone, and midazolam play unique analgesic roles. The dosing of these medications to prevent neurotoxicity is characterized in various cellular and in-vivo models. Much of this mitigation may be via reducing the dose of local anesthetic used while achieving equal or superior analgesia. Dose-concentration animal models have shown no evidence of deleterious effects. Clinical observations regarding blocks with combined bupivacaine-clonidine-buprenorphine-dexamethasone have shown beneficial effects on block duration and rebound pain without long-term evidence of neurotoxicity. In-vitro and in-vivo studies of perineural clonidine and dexmedetomidine show attenuation of perineural inflammatory responses generated by local anesthetics. SUMMARY: Dexmedetomidine added as a peripheral nerve blockade adjuvant improves block duration without neurotoxic properties. The combined adjuvants clonidine, buprenorphine, and dexamethasone do not appear to alter local anesthetic neurotoxicity. Midazolam significantly increases local anesthetic neurotoxicity in vitro, but when combined with clonidine-buprenorphine-dexamethasone (sans local anesthetic) produces no in-vitro or in-vivo neurotoxicity. Further larger-species animal testing and human trials will be required to reinforce the clinical applicability of these findings.

Failure of Intraoperative Red Cell Salvage: A Patient with Sickle Cell Disease and HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets) Syndrome.

Cell salvage is a process whereby the bloodshed from the operative field is collected and returned to the patient. It can be especially useful when allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) units are not readily available such as when the recipient has multiple alloantibodies. We report on the anesthesia and transfusion strategies for managing a pregnant patient with sickle cell disease (SCD) with HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets) syndrome. A pregnant patient with twins at 30 weeks of gestation was admitted in an SCD crisis. She subsequently developed HELLP syndrome and required urgent cesarean delivery; however, she had multiple RBC antibodies complicating the immediate provision of cross-matched RBC units. Cell salvage was used to capture the blood shed during her procedure while the blood bank was searching for compatible RBCs units. Despite multiple interventions designed to optimize the cell salvage procedure for the unique challenges of a patient with SCD, the salvaged RBCs hemolyzed and could not be reinfused. Cell salvage in an obstetric patient with SCD in an acute crisis and super-imposed HELLP was unable to recover intact and useable RBCs. Further studies into methods of optimizing the procedure for use in this context are warranted. Close communication between the clinical teams treating the patient and the transfusion service is required so that the RBC transfusion requirements can be anticipated; this is especially important when the patient has multiple antibodies.

The cost of resident scholarly activity and its effect on resident clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: Scholarly activity is an important aspect of the academic training of future anesthesiologists. However, residents' scholarly activity may reduce training caseloads and increase departmental costs. METHODS: We conducted this study within a large academic anesthesiology residency program with data from the 4 graduating classes of 2009 through 2012. Scholarly activity included peer-reviewed manuscripts, case reports, poster presentations at conferences, book chapters, or any other publications. It was not distinguished whether a resident was the principal investigator or a coinvestigator on a project. The following data were collected on each resident: months spent on a resident research rotation, number of scholarly projects completed, number of research conferences attended, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case entries. Comparison was made between residents electing a resident research rotation with those who did not for (1) scholarly projects, (2) research conference attendance, and (3) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case numbers. Cost to the department for extra clinical coverage during residents' time spent on research activities was calculated using an estimated average cost of $675 ± $176 (mean ± SD) per day with local certified registered nurse anesthetist pay scales. RESULTS: Sixty-eight residents were included in the analyses. Twenty-four residents (35.3%) completed resident research rotations with an average duration of 3.7 months. Residents who elected resident research rotations completed more scholarly projects (5 projects [4-6]: median [25%-75% interquartile range] vs 2 [0-3]; P < 0.0001), attended more research conferences (2 conferences [2-4] vs 1 [0-2]; P < 0.0001), but experienced fewer cases (980 cases [886-1333] vs 1182 [930-1420]; P ≤ 0.002) compared with those who did not elect resident research rotations. The estimated average cost to the department per resident who elected a resident research rotation was $13,500 ± $9724 per month. The average resident time length away from duty for conference attendance was 3.2 ± 0.2 days, with an average cost to the department of $2160 ± $565. The average annual departmental expense for resident conference travel was an additional $1424 ± $133 per resident, as calculated from reimbursement data. Together, the estimated departmental cost for resident scholarly activity during the residency training period was $27,467 ± $20,153 per resident. CONCLUSIONS: Residents' scholarly activities require significant departmental financial support. Residents who elected to spend months conducting research completed significantly more scholarly projects but experienced fewer clinical cases.