Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Organ motion is a challenge during high-precision external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer, and improved strategies for treatment adaptation and monitoring of target dose coverage are needed. This study evaluates a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In twenty-three patients, individualized internal target volumes (ITVs) were generated from pre-treatment MRI and CT scans with full and empty bladders. The target volumes encompassed high-risk clinical target volume (CTV-T HR) (gross tumor volume + remaining cervix) and low risk (LR) CTV-T (CTV-T HR + uterus + parametriae + upper vagina). Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) was used to deliver a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. CBCTs were used for setup and for radiation therapists (RTTs) to evaluate the target coverage (inside/outside the planning target volume). CBCTs were reviewed offline. Estimates of the dose delivered with minimum (point) doses across all fractions to CTV-T HR (aim 42.75 Gy) and CTV-T LR (aim 40 Gy) were assessed. In patients with insufficient dose coverage, re-plans were generated based on previous imaging. RESULTS: Median (range) of the ITV-margins (mean of anterior-posterior margins) related to uterus and cervix was 1.2 (0.5-2.2 and 1.0-2.1) cm. RTTs were able to assess the target coverage in 90% of all CBCTs (505/563). With re-planning, one patient had considerable benefit (12.7 Gy increase of minimum dose) to CTV-T LR_vagina, four patients had improved dose to the CTV-T LR_uterus (1.2-1.8 Gy), and 3 patients did not benefit from re-planning. CONCLUSIONS: Daily CBCT-based monitoring of target coverage by the RTTs has proven safe with limited workload. It allows for reduction in the treated volumes without compromising the target dose coverage.

Prospective evaluation of acute toxicity and patient reported outcomes in anal cancer and plan optimization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard therapy for localized anal cancer (AC), but this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity. However, there is a lack of prospectively collected toxicity and patient reported outcome (PRO) data from larger cohorts. The purpose was to prospectively collect and determine agreement between physician assessed toxicity (CTCAE) and PRO during and after CRT and to compare IMRT, VMAT and proton-based planning in a subgroup of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients, treated with CRT for AC, were included between 2015 and 2017. NCI-CTCAE v.4.0, EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 data were collected baseline, mid-therapy, end-of therapy and 2-4 weeks posttherapy. Treatment planning with 5- or 6-fixed field IMRT, 2 and 3 arc VMAT, and 3- and 4-field proton plans were compared. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included. Both CTCAE and PROs related to acute toxicity reached a maximum at end of therapy. Incidences of PROs were markedly higher with only slight to fair agreement to CTCAE, (κ 13-37). Comparative planning revealed dosimetric equality of IMRT and VMAT plans, but superiority of proton plans. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of PRO scores and weak agreement to CTCAE suggest that PROs are important tools complementary to CTCAE in evaluating patient symptoms during and after CRT. Proton therapy has the potential to lower radiation doses to most organs at risk.