A Technical Comparison of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Assays from a Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in South Central Ethiopia.

Purpose: High-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most important cause of cervical cancer. The highest burden of disease is seen in Low- and Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Several new HPV screening assays have been developed for high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) testing. We compared the performance and adequacy of three HPV genotyping assays on samples from a population of rural women in south-central Ethiopia. Patients and Methods: One hundred and ten cervical swabs from rural women screened for HPV were assayed. HPV DNA was tested using MPG-Luminex Assay, Anyplex II HPV HR Detection, and EUROArray HPV. MPG-Luminex Assay was used as a reference method to compute the sensitivity and specificity of the two commercial assays in detecting hr-HPV infections. Results: Of the 110 samples, MPG-Luminex Assay found 18.2% positive for the 14 hr-HPV and 7.3% for the probable hr-HPV genotypes. Anyplex™ II HPV HR Detection assay and EUROArray HPV Assay identified 21.82% and 12.7% samples, respectively, for the 14 hr-HPVs and both 7.3% for the probable hr-HPV genotypes (κ=0.734). Among the 14 hr-HPV genotypes, the genotype-specific agreement of the three HPV genotyping assays was moderate or better for HPV16, 31, 35, 39, 52, 56, 66 and 68. The aggregated sensitivity in detecting the 14 hr-HPV infections of Anyplex™ II HPV HR Detection and EUROArray HPV assays was high, 100% and 70%, respectively. The specificities of Anyplex™ II HPV HR Detection and EUROArray HPV were 95.6% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The three evaluated assays showed similar analytical performance in the detection of hr-HPV infections and moderate or better concordance in HPV genotyping. This study is part of the ongoing cluster-randomized trial that has been registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03281135) on September 13, 2017.

Analytical Evaluation of the Human Papillomavirus HPV DNA Array E1-Based Genotyping Assay.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is caused by a persistent infection of human papillomavirus (HPV). Therefore, tests which detect the carcinogenic virus can be used for cervical cancer screening. OBJECTIVE: This is the first evaluation of the HPV DNA Array (AID Diagnostika, Strassberg, Germany), an E1-based genotyping polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for identification of 29 HPV types (6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 58, 59, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 73, 82, 85, and 97). METHODS: Analytical performance of the assay was assessed with cervical cancer cell lines with known HPV status, and preselected clinical cervical scrapings genotyped by multiplexed genotyping (MPG) with a Luminex readout (validated in-house assay). Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility experiments were performed to ensure the reliability of the assay. RESULTS: HPV DNA Array identified the intrinsic HPV genotype in all cervical cancer cell lines and demonstrated a high sensitivity for HPV16 probe (1 cell per PCR reaction), as well as HPV18 and 45 probes (100 cells per PCR reaction). When compared with MPG, HPV DNA Array showed a good agreement of 92.2% for HPV detection irrespective of type (κ = 0.601), and demonstrated high agreement for HPV16 (80.7%, κ = 0.836) and HPV18 (86.7%, κ = 0.925). Furthermore, high intra-/inter-laboratory reproducibility was observed (90.9-100%). CONCLUSION: HPV DNA Array showed high sensitivity for correct HPV genotype detection in experimental and clinical samples with a good correlation to the reference test. Since HPV DNA Array is based on a simple multiplexed PCR followed by reverse hybridization in a 96-well format and automated visual readout by AID ELISpot reader, it is capable of high throughput in a time-effective manner. HPV DNA Array could be considered for extended HPV genotyping of cervical smears.

Vaccination strategies for the treatment and prevention of cervical cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immunotherapy of HPV-induced premalignant anogenital lesions and cervical cancer has made impressive progress. HPV as causative agent is targeted by prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination strategies. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown induction of natural and/or vaccine-induced immune responses. This review will summarize the status of vaccine development and clinical testing published since March 2003. RECENT FINDINGS: For prophylactic vaccines there is first clinical evidence of effectivity (ie, 100% protection from HPV infection and dysplasia by virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies). Also, therapeutic vaccines have entered clinical evaluation. While prophylactic VLP vaccines are immunogenic per se, therapeutic vaccines will need further adjuvants to guide T cell differentiation, expansion, survival, and homing to tumor sites. To enhance clinical outcome of successful T cell induction in patients, the susceptibility of the tumor cells for lysis must be addressed in the future, since tumor immune evasion is a severe problem in cervical cancer. SUMMARY: While successful prophylactic HPV vaccines have entered large clinical trials, therapeutic HPV vaccines, in spite of T cell induction, lack clinical responses due to the problem of tumor immune evasion. Adjuvants for systemic and local immune modulation will be mandatory for effective therapy.

Dendritic cell-based tumor vaccine for cervical cancer II: results of a clinical pilot study in 15 individual patients.

PURPOSE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 are the most prevalent genotypes in cervical cancer. The viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 are considered to be tumor-specific targets for immunotherapy. HPV E7 antigen-loaded autologous dendritic cells (DC) were evaluated as cellular tumor vaccine in a case series of cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Autologous monocyte-derived DCs were pulsed with recombinant HPV16 E7 or HPV18 E7 oncoprotein and administered to 15 stage IV cervical cancer patients. Safety, toxicity, and induction of serological and cellular immune responses were monitored. RESULTS: The vaccine was well-tolerated and no local or systemic side effects or toxicity were recorded. A specific serologic response was seen in 3/11 evaluated patients. Specific cellular immune responses (4/11) were detected with 2/10 positive de novo reactions plus one boosted preexistent response in proliferation assays and 3/11 in IFN-gamma ELISpot assays. A transient drop in tumor marker SCC was observed in 5/9 evaluable patients but did not correlate with markers of the immune response. No objective clinical response was observed. Tumor biopsies available from four patients showed severe or complete loss of HLA expression in three of the advanced tumors. CONCLUSION: Autologous dendritic cells pulsed with HPV E7 protein can induce T cell responses in a portion of late stage cervical cancer patients. Boosting of immune responses by adjuvants and vaccination of tumor HLA-positive patients will be mandatory in future trials.