Detection and modification of biomarkers of inflammation determining successful rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Growing evidence suggests that both local and systemic inflammation plays a key role even in early stages and its progression towards persisting and permanent AF. Rhythm control therapy via pulmonary vein isolation or cardioversion is the cornerstone of AF therapy for most symptomatic patients, yet arrhythmia recurrence after treatment is still common, especially in patients with persistent AF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge of biomarkers of inflammation with prognostic value in patients with atrial fibrillation as well as anti-inflammatory medication with potential benefits after rhythm control therapy. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Both onset of AF, progression and arrhythmia recurrence after rhythm control therapy can be caused by local and systemic inflammation. Various inflammatory biomarkers have been established to predict treatment success. Furthermore, additional anti-inflammatory therapy may significantly improve success rates.

P-wave detection performance of the BioMonitor III, Confirm Rx and Reveal Linq implantable loop recorders.

INTRODUCTION: Rhythm interpretation of EGMs recorded by implantable loop recorders (ILRs) is facilitated in cases when p-waves are visible. The three most commonly used ILRs (BioMonitor III, Confirm RX and Reveal Linq) vary in size, electrode placement and filter algorithms. Therefore, p-wave visibility and amplitude on EGM may vary according to the implanted device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients were included after ILR implantation. P-wave visibility and amplitude were evaluated in sinus rhythm on 30-s EGMs with standard resolution (25 mm/mV for Biotronik and St. Jude, 30 mm/mV for Medtronic) and after maximum magnification. Additionally, baseline characteristics and p-wave amplitude in lead II on the surface-ECG were documented. RESULTS: 148 patients with either BioMonitor III (n = 48), Confirm Rx (n = 51) or Reveal Linq (n = 49) ILRs were included. With standard resolution, p-waves were visible in 40 patients (83%) implanted with BioMonitor III, 36 patients (71%) with Confirm Rx and in 35 patients (71%) with Reveal Linq ILRs (p = 0.267). After maximum magnification, p-waves could not be identified in 6 patients with Confirm Rx ILR (12%) and 1 patient in both BioMonitor III and Reveal Linq ILR (2%; p = 0.051). The Biomonitor III showed higher p-wave amplitudes compared to the Confirm Rx (0.050 mV (0.040-0.070) vs. 0.030 mV (0.020-0.040); p < 0.001) and the Reveal Linq ILR (0.050 mV (0.040-0.070) vs. 0.030 mV (0.020-0.040); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: P-wave amplitudes were higher in patients with Biomonitor III. This did not lead to higher p-wave visibility compared to the Confirm RX ILR or the Reveal Linq ILR.

Safe procedures despite ultra low radiation doses during catheter ablations of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias-A multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the development of non-fluoroscopic catheter visualization options, fluoroscopy is still used in most ablation procedures. The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new ultra-low dose radiation protocol for EP procedures in a large number of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3462 consecutive patients (male 1926 (55.6%), age 64.4 ± 14.0 years, BMI 26.65 ± 4.70) undergoing radiofrequency ablation (left atrial (n = 2316 [66.9%], right atrial (n = 675 [19.5%], or ventricular (n = 471 [13.6%]) in three German centers were included in the analysis. Procedures were performed using a new ultra-low dose protocol operating at 8nGy for fluoroscopy and 36nGy for cine-loops. Additionally a very low framerate (2-3FPS) was used. Using the new protocol very low Air kerma-area product (KAP) values were achieved for left atrial ablations (104.25 ± 84.22 µGym2 ), right atrial ablations (70.98 ± 94.79 µGym2 ) and ablations for ventricular tachycardias or PVCs (78.62 ± 66.59 µGym2 ). Acute procedural success was achieved in 3289/3388 (97.1%) while the rate of major complications was very low compared to previously published studies not using low dose settings (n = 20, 0.6%). CONCLUSION: The ultra-low dose, low framerate protocol leads to very low radiation doses for all EP procedures while neither procedural time, fluoroscopy time nor success or complication rates were compromised. When compared to current real-world Air KAP data the new ultra-low dose fluoroscopy protocol reduces radiation exposure by more than 90%.

[Update on radiation exposure in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation]. / Update zum Strahlenschutz bei der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern.

The rising number of catheter ablations of atrial fibrillation increases radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons. Fortunately, this trend is counteracted by the development of measures to reduce total fluoroscopy time using non-fluoroscopic catheter visualization. Since even low-dose radiation can cause serious injury, all options to reduce radiation burden must be utilized (ALARA, "as low as reasonably achievable"). Dose reduction protocols with low-dose settings, which include reduced framerates, pulse duration, detector entrance dose and increased beam hardening, play a decisive role in this regard. This review provides a state-of-the-art summary of non-fluoroscopic catheter visualization and dose reduction protocols for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Correlation of P-wave properties with the size of left atrial low voltage areas in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial low voltage areas (LVA) are associated with increased recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation and can be a potential ablation target during the procedure. Therefore, noninvasive prediction of the presence and the distribution of LVA may help physicians to predict ablation outcomes and to guide antiarrhythmic management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first time left atrial ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF were enrolled. P-wave properties (amplitude and duration) were measured in all limb and precordial leads in pre-interventional sinus rhythm surface ECGs and correlated with total LVA size. LVA were detected via high density low voltage maps of the left atrium in sinus rhythm. LVA were then manually encircled, their total size was calculated and given as a percentage of the total LA surface area. RESULTS: A significant, inverse correlation with LVA size was shown for P-wave amplitude for leads I, II, aVR, aVF, V1, V4, V5 and V6. Additionally, a significant positive correlation between LVA size and P-wave duration was shown for leads V1, V2 and V3. As the strongest correlation was shown for the amplitude in lead I (R = -0.578), this lead was used to find a potential cutoff for LVA prediction. The best cut-off for a P-wave amplitude in lead I to predict severe scarring (defined as LVA size >35%, according to UTAH stadium IV) was 0.062 mV with an area-under-the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.935, a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 88%. CONCLUSIONS: P-wave duration and amplitude show significant correlations with LVA size and may be used as a noninvasive tool to predict severe scarring. Amplitudes in lead I smaller than 0.062 mV were found to be predictive of LVA >35%.

A combination of rare complications 3 years after a dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.

Late perforation of the atrial wall after pacemaker implantation frequently remains asymptomatic but may cause chest pain, dyspnea or syncope. Perforation can also lead to rarer complications such as hemoptysis and pneumopericardium. We present the case of a patient who developed progressive hemoptysis 3 years after a dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker interrogation showed stable impedance of the right atrial lead and stable pacing threshold values. CT revealed perforation of the right atrial wall by the RA-lead with consecutive pneumopericardium and diffuse lung bleeding of the right middle lobe. The patient was hemodynamically stable at all times. The right atrial lead was transvenously extracted and replaced without any further complications.

Pushing the limits: establishing an ultra-low framerate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol for left atrial ablations.

Aims: Despite the use of 3D mapping systems and new developments of non-fluoroscopic options, most centres still rely at least in part on fluoroscopy for catheter visualization during catheter ablations. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an ultra-low frame rate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol during complex left atrial ablations to minimize radiation exposure for the patient and staff. Methods and results: A total of 150 consecutive patients undergoing left atrial ablations in our hospital were included in the analysis. The procedures were performed between January 2015 and November 2016. Of the included patients 75 (50%) underwent ablation before and 75 (50%) after the ultra-low frame rate (reduced from 4 to 2 FPS) and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol was established. Procedures performed after the dose reduction protocol was established showed a 64% reduction of the dose area product (630.28 ± 550.96 vs. 226.44 ± 277.44 µGym2, P < 0.001), while fluoroscopy duration (14.22 ± 4.47 vs. 13.62 ± 7.11 min, P = 0.066) and procedural duration (1:48 ± 0:28 vs. 1:53 ± 0:34 min, P = 0.525) were not prolonged. Acute procedural success was achieved in all procedures. Two complications occurred before and one complication after the protocol was established. During four procedures, operators decided to re-introduce the antiscatter grid. This was due to impaired visibility in morbidly obese patients (n = 2) or technically difficult transseptal puncture (n = 2). Conclusion: The use of an ultra low framerate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol effectively reduced radiation dose for complex left atrial ablation procedures and lead to very low average patient doses. Reduced image quality did not impair procedural and fluoroscopy duration or acute procedural success.

The effect of an ultra-low frame rate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol for cardiac device implantations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antiscatter grids improve image contrast by absorbing scattered x-ray beams, although by removing the antiscatter grid patient dose can be reduced as more x-ray beams reach the image receptor. Additionally, there is a trend toward ultra-low frame rates for radiation dose reduction during various electrophysiology procedures. As for most cardiac device implantations (CIED) image quality demands are usually modest, the purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of an ultra-low frame rate and scatter grid-less radiation protocol. METHODS/RESULTS: A total of 140 patients undergoing CIED implantation between 2014 and 2017 were included in the study. Seventy patients (50%) implanted after implementation of the antiscatter grid-less and ultra-low frame rate protocol were matched to controls before the dose-reduction protocol was established. Forty patients (28.6%) had a one-chamber pacemaker or one-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation/revision, 60 (42.9%) had a two-chamber pacemaker or two-chamber ICD implantation/revision, and 40 (28.6%) patients had a cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation/revision. Removing the antiscatter-grid and lowering the frame rate led to a 73% reduction of the overall dose area product (1,206 ± 2,015 vs 324 ± 422 µGym, P < 0.001). Procedural duration (95 ± 51 minutes vs 82 ± 44 minutes, P  =  0.053) and rate of complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of an ultra-low frame rate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol significantly reduced radiation dose for implantation of CIED and led to very low average patient doses, while procedural duration and complication rates did not increase.

[Ablation of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia via combined access through the medial cubital and axillary vein]. / Ablation einer AV-Knoten-Reentrytachykardie mit kombiniertem Zugang via Vena mediana cubiti und Vena axillaris.

If a transfemoral approach for catheter ablation procedures of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias is impossible, other access sites have to be considered. We present the case of a 78-year-old woman with an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter with symptomatic episodes of an atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We used a combined cubital and axillary vein approach. The tachycardia was successfully ablated within the timeframe needed for conventional ablation.