Palliative Medicine-Becoming a Subspecialty of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

The discipline of palliative medicine in Canada started in 1975 with the coining of the term "palliative care." Shortly thereafter, the provision of clinical palliative medicine services started, although the education of the discipline lagged behind. In 1993, the Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians (CSPCP) started to explore the option of creating an accredited training program in palliative medicine. This article outlines the process by which, over the course of 20 years, palliative medicine training in Canada went from a mission statement of the CSPCP, to a 1 year of added competence jointly accredited by both the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (Royal College) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada, to a 2-year subspecialty of the Royal College with access from multiple entry routes and a formalized accrediting examination.

Development and Validation of a Set of Palliative Medicine Entrustable Professional Activities: Findings from a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are routine tasks considered essential to a professional practice. An EPA can serve as a performance-based outcome that a clinical supervisor would progressively entrust a learner to perform. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify, develop, and validate a set of EPAs for the palliative medicine discipline. METHODS: The design was a sequential qualitative and quantitative mixed methods study. A working group was convened to develop a set of EPAs. Focus groups and surveys were used for validation purposes. Palliative medicine educators and content experts from across Canada participated in both the working group as well as the focus groups. Attendees of the 2014 Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians (CSPCP) annual conference completed surveys. A questionnaire was used to collect survey participant sociodemographic, clinical, and academic information along with ratings of the importance of the EPAs individually and collectively. Cronbach's alpha examined internal consistency of the set of EPAs. RESULTS: Focus group participants strongly endorsed the 12 EPAs. Virtually all survey participants rated the individual EPAs as being "fairly/very important" (range 94% to 100%). Of the participants, 97% agreed that residents able to perform the set of EPAs would be practicing palliative medicine and 87% indicated strong agreement that this collective set of EPAs captures activities that all palliative medicine physicians must be able to perform. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.841 confirmed good internal consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Near uniform agreement from a national group of palliative medicine physicians provides strong validation for the set of 12 EPAs.

Educating medical residents in end-of-life care: insights from a multicenter survey.

BACKGROUND: Physicians play a key role in the provision of quality end-of-life (EOL) care but often lack requisite knowledge and skills. Residency programs must ensure training in palliative/EOL care to address this gap. OBJECTIVE: To guide the development of curricula, we assessed internal medicine residents' attitudes, knowledge, perceived competence, and learning priorities in EOL care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered, descriptive survey using a convenience sample. SUBJECTS: Internal medicine residents at five universities across Canada. RESULTS: Of a total of 318 internal medicine residents, 185 (58%) participated in the survey. The majority (81.7%) agreed learning from dying patients was meaningful although 48.1% felt guilty, and 40.6% a failure at least sometimes after a patient's death. Two thirds had provided care to more than 10 dying patients. Most (73%) had conducted at least 3 family meetings; 26.7% were never observed. Mean self-assessed preparedness to provide EOL care was 6.1 +/- 2 (scale 0-10) and mean comfort level 3.2 +/- 0.8 (scale 0-5). Residents reported more than average competence in 50% of EOL competencies listed with record keeping highest (3.6 +/- 0.7) and use of nonpharmacologic interventions for pain lowest (2.2 +/- 0.8). Priority for learning was rated above average for all EOL competencies listed with use of opioids for management of pain highest (4.1 +/- 0.9) and discussing euthanasia lowest (3.1 +/- 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents value opportunities to learn from dying patients but often lack supervision and experience emotional distress. Comparing residents' attitudes, perceptions of competence, and learning priorities provide insights into why certain EOL competencies are more challenging to teach and can guide development of meaningful educational experiences.

Core competencies: the next generation. Comparison of a common framework for multiple professions.

This report demonstrates the application of a competency model to the regulated and unregulated professions of medical radiation technology, social work, pharmacy, and psychology. The competency model is based on the CanMEDS framework and was originally applied to the professions of medicine, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and nursing in an earlier work. The framework identifies the core competencies common to learners in health care, which are professional (and health advocate), expert, scholar, manager, communicator, and collaborator. In this report, these core competencies are applied to four additional disciplines in an effort to make the cultural shift from discipline-based silos to a common language for ascertaining the skills, knowledge, and attitudes needed to function in interprofessional teams.

The last 48 hours of life in long-term care: a focused chart audit.

OBJECTIVES: As a component of palliative care educational program development, the faculty at the University of Ottawa Institute of Palliative Care wished to assess end-of-life care for patients in long-term care (LTC) settings to develop an educational strategy for physicians. DESIGN: A chart audit, focusing on the last 48 hours of life of residents dying in LTC facilities. SETTING: Five LTC facilities in a city in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Residents who died in the LTC facilities in a 12-month period. Those who died suddenly (i.e., with no palliation period) or in a hospital were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Symptoms highlighted in the literature as commonly found in the terminally ill and the matching treatments were recorded on an audit form created by the authors. Included were pain, dyspnea, noisy breathing, delirium, dysphagia, fever, and myoclonus. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five charts were reviewed. A large number of patients were cognitively impaired. Cancer was the final diagnosis in 14% of cases. Respiratory symptoms were the most prevalent symptom, with dyspnea being first and noisy breathing third. Pain was second, with a prevalence similar to that found in studies of cancer patients. Dyspnea was not treated in 23% of the patients with this symptom; opioids were used in only 27% of cases with dyspnea. Ninety-nine percent of patients who experienced pain were treated for it. Less than one-third of patients with noisy breathing were treated. Delirium was not treated in 38% of the cases, and no anti-dopaminergic medications were administered. Nurses were primarily responsible for documenting end-of-life issues, supporting the families of the dying residents, and communicating with other team members. CONCLUSION: The focused chart audit identified the high prevalence of cognitive impairment in the patient population, which complicates symptom management. Respiratory symptoms predominated in the last 48 hours of life. This symptom profile differs from that of cancer patients, who, according to the literature, have more pain and less respiratory trouble. Management of symptoms was variable. Nurses played a crucial role in the care of dying residents through their documentation and communication of end-of-life issues. Appropriate palliative care education can provide knowledge and skills to all health-care professionals, including physicians, and assist them in the control of symptoms and improvement of quality of life for patients dying in LTC facilities.

Low dose ketamine as an analgesic adjuvant in difficult pain syndromes: a strategy for conversion from parenteral to oral ketamine.

Ketamine is a non-competitive N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with analgesic and dissociative anesthetic properties. Low dose or sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine have been used effectively as either a primary analgesic or analgesic adjuvant in a variety of pain syndromes. In this paper, three patients with difficult to treat, predominantly neuropathic pain syndromes will be described. Their pain syndromes were initially managed successfully with the addition of low dose parenteral ketamine as an analgesic adjuvant. The strategy of concurrently starting ketamine at a low dose, i.e., 40-60 mg over 24 hours, with a benzodiazepine proved effective in preventing psychotomimetic side effects. An unavoidable shortage of ketamine prompted a literature search, which suggested that the equianalgesic dose of oral ketamine could be lower than the parenteral dose. Subsequently the patients were converted to oral ketamine at doses 30 to 40% of the previous parenteral dose. Their pain syndromes remained controlled on the lower dose of oral ketamine with remarkably few side effects. The implications of this warrant further discussion and study.