Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: The rate of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is low. It is not known whether this rate will increase if laypersons are trained to attempt defibrillation with the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, community-based, multicenter clinical trial in which we randomly assigned community units (e.g., shopping malls and apartment complexes) to a structured and monitored emergency-response system involving lay volunteers trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone or in CPR and the use of AEDs. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: More than 19,000 volunteer responders from 993 community units in 24 North American regions participated. The two study groups had similar unit and volunteer characteristics. Patients with treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the two groups were similar in age (mean, 69.8 years), proportion of men (67 percent), rate of cardiac arrest in a public location (70 percent), and rate of witnessed cardiac arrest (72 percent). No inappropriate shocks were delivered. There were more survivors to hospital discharge in the units assigned to have volunteers trained in CPR plus the use of AEDs (30 survivors among 128 arrests) than there were in the units assigned to have volunteers trained only in CPR (15 among 107; P=0.03; relative risk, 2.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.07 to 3.77); there were only 2 survivors in residential complexes. Functional status at hospital discharge did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Training and equipping volunteers to attempt early defibrillation within a structured response system can increase the number of survivors to hospital discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in public locations. Trained laypersons can use AEDs safely and effectively.

A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There are two approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation: one is cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm, and the other is the use of rate-controlling drugs, allowing atrial fibrillation to persist. In both approaches, the use of anticoagulant drugs is recommended. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, multicenter comparison of these two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death. The primary end point was overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4060 patients (mean [+/-SD] age, 69.7+/-9.0 years) were enrolled in the study; 70.8 percent had a history of hypertension, and 38.2 percent had coronary artery disease. Of the 3311 patients with echocardiograms, the left atrium was enlarged in 64.7 percent and left ventricular function was depressed in 26.0 percent. There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control therapy (mortality at five years, 23.8 percent and 21.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.34]; P=0.08). More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate-control group were hospitalized, and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well. In both groups, the majority of strokes occurred after warfarin had been stopped or when the international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic. CONCLUSIONS: Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy, and there are potential advantages, such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects, with the rate-control strategy. Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients.

Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.

AIMS: Three randomized trials of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy vs medical treatment for the prevention of death in survivors of ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia have been reported with what might appear to be different results. The present analysis was performed to obtain the most precise estimate of the efficacy of the ICD, compared to amiodarone, for prolonging survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual patient data from the Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) study, the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH) and the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS) were merged into a master database according to a pre-specified protocol. Proportional hazard modelling of individual patient data was used to estimate hazard ratios and to investigate subgroup interactions. Fixed effect meta-analysis techniques were also used to evaluate treatment effects and to assess heterogeneity across studies. The classic fixed effects meta-analysis showed that the estimates of ICD benefit from the three studies were consistent with each other (P heterogeneity=0.306). It also showed a significant reduction in death from any cause with the ICD; with a summary hazard ratio (ICD:amiodarone) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.60, 0.87;P=0.0006). For the outcome of arrhythmic death, the hazard ratio was 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.37, 0.67;P<0.0001). Survival was extended by a mean of 4.4 months by the ICD over a follow-up period of 6 years. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% derived significantly more benefit from ICD therapy than those with better preserved left ventricular function. Patients treated before the availability of non-thoracotomy ICD implants derived significantly less benefit from ICD therapy than those treated in the non-thoracotomy era. CONCLUSION: Results from the three trials of the ICD vs amiodarone are consistent with each other. There is a 28% reduction in the relative risk of death with the ICD that is due almost entirely to a 50% reduction in arrhythmic death.

Quality of life at baseline: is assessment after randomization valid? The AVID Investigators. The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this report is to examine whether differences existed between patients who completed a baseline quality of life (QoL) form before being informed about their randomized assignments versus those who completed it after knowing their randomization assignments. METHODS: In the pilot phase of the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) study (n = 200), 113 patients completed a baseline QoL battery prior to randomization (drug versus defibrillator), 49 additional patients completed this battery after randomization, and 38 patients did not complete this battery. Baseline demographic, clinical and QoL data were compared for these groups. RESULTS: Although the two groups with QoL data were not significantly different regarding various clinical and demographic characteristics, they did have significantly different QoL profiles. Patients with QoL collected before randomization had better overall QoL scores and mental health scores. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that patients with worse QoL may be less willing to complete a baseline QoL form in a timely manner or that knowledge of the randomization assignment may have an effect on QoL.

Influence of long-term, low-dose, diuretic-based, antihypertensive therapy on glucose, lipid, uric acid, and potassium levels in older men and women with isolated systolic hypertension: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies often of short duration have raised concerns that antihypertensive therapy with diuretics and beta-blockers adversely alters levels of other cardiovascular disease risk factors. METHODS: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program was a community-based, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in men and women aged 60 years and older. This retrospective analysis evaluated development of diabetes mellitus in all 4736 participants in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program, including changes in serum chemistry test results in a subgroup for 3 years. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or treatment with active drugs, with the dose increased in stepwise fashion if blood pressure control goals were not attained: step 1, 12.5 mg of chlorthalidone or 25.0 mg of chlorthalidone; and step 2, the addition of 25 mg of atenolol or 50 mg of atenolol or reserpine or matching placebo. RESULTS: After 3 years, the active treatment group had a 13/4 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the placebo group (both groups, P<.001). New cases of diabetes were reported by 8.6% of the participants in the active treatment group and 7.5% of the participants in the placebo group (P=.25). Small effects of active treatment compared with placebo were observed with fasting levels of glucose (+0.20 mmol/L [+3.6 mg/dL]; P<.01), total cholesterol (+0.09 mmol/L [+3.5 mg/dL]; P<.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.02 mmol/L [-0.77 mg/dL]; P<.01) and creatinine (+2.8 micromol/L [+0.03 mg/dL]; P<.001). Larger effects were seen with fasting levels of triglycerides (+0.9 mmol/L [+17 mg/dL]; P<.001), uric acid (+35 micromol/L [+.06 mg/dL]; P<.001), and potassium (-0.3 mmol/L; P<.001). No evidence was found for a subgroup at higher risk of risk factor changes with active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive therapy with low-dose chlorthalidone (supplemented if necessary) for isolated systolic hypertension lowers blood pressure and its cardiovascular disease complications and has relatively mild effects on other cardiovascular disease risk factor levels.

Ongoing and planned clinical trials of anti-arrhythmic drugs: an update.

Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy is frequently used for the control of ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of heart disease. These agents have been used in many randomised clinical trials in an attempt to demonstrate improved survival. However, most studies have been disappointing, showing little or no improvement in survival, and, in some cases, deterioration. This report reviews ongoing clinical trials designed to evaluate survival in specific patient populations.

Clinical trial participant satisfaction: survey of SHEP enrollees. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine older persons' reasons for joining a clinical trial, and to provide data that could be useful in planning and carrying out clinical trials in older and minority populations. DESIGN: A survey. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 4281 men and women 60 years of age or older who were randomized to the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). MEASUREMENTS: A 10-item satisfaction/attitude questionnaire was designed to evaluate (1) what personal benefits people expect from participation in this trial, (2) motivation for joining, and (3) satisfaction with clinic staff and operations. Each question had a response category asking for a measure of agreement, satisfaction, or importance. RESULTS: The most important reasons for joining the clinical trial were to contribute to science (96%), improve the health of others (96%), and improve their own health (93%). Free medical care and social aspects were less important reasons to join. There were no differences by treatment assignment, but differences in reasons for joining SHEP by age, race, gender, and education were observed. CONCLUSION: Older adults were enthusiastic about clinical trial participation. Recruitment, participant management strategies, and allocation of resources should consider the needs of specific patient groups.

Clinical and socioeconomic profile of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias in 1993 to 1995. AVID investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator.

This report summarizes the clinical and socioeconomic characteristics of the first 542 patients entered into the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) trial. AVID is a multicenter trial comparing a strategy of initial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to initial antiarrhythmic drug therapy in preventing death in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest who were not taking amiodarone and who did not have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in place at the time of the index event. These patients were randomly assigned to immediate defibrillator placement or to "best" medical therapy. Clinical and socioeconomic histories were collected by interview using standard terms developed for the study. Patients without (group 1) and with (group 2) a history of prior cardiac arrest were compared. The mean age of the 542 patients was 65 +/- 10 years, most were men, white, had coronary disease, and were highly functional despite the fact that only a minority were employed. Almost all had some form of health insurance. At the time of the index event, few were taking any therapy to prevent cardiac arrest, even in the group of patients with a history of previous cardiac arrest. Thus, the clinical and socioeconomic profile of patients resuscitated from sudden cardiac death entered into the AVID study is generally as expected. There is a striking absence of any attempt at chronic therapy to prevent cardiac arrest in most patients with a prior ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.

Gender differences in health-related quality of life among postmyocardial infarction patients: brief report. CAST Investigators. Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials.

Heart disease is the leading cause of death among women in the United States. The prognosis for heart disease is worse for women than for men. Also, although women are less likely than men to initially present with a myocardial infarction (MI), they are more likely to die following an MI. A number of factors have been identified that partially account for the gender difference in post-MI morbidity and mortality. However, limited data are available on the sex differences in clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors that may combine to explain the poorer prognosis for women following an acute MI. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials collected detailed demographic, clinical, and psychosocial data on 2,043 men and 448 women following acute MIs. Analyses indicate that women had a worse clinical, socioeconomic, and psychosocial profile than did men. In addition, significant differences in psychosocial profiles persisted after controlling for demographic and clinical data, suggesting that women presenting with MIs have a cluster of complex factors that put them at high risk for morbidity and mortality following an MI. Future longitudinal studies that include adequate numbers of women as well as reliable assessments of both clinical and psychological variables are needed to better understand the factors that influence the poor prognosis for women with coronary heart disease.

Relation of sociodemographic, clinical, and quality-of-life variables to adherence in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial.

Clearly, age and education are important factors for predicting adherence in CAST, given that they appear in all three regressions. Moreover, the 4-month and 1-year results indicate that mental health and presence of a spouse are important predictors. Physical function, stress, angina, and history of MI may also provide additional information regarding adherence levels. It is interesting to note that although adherence was higher for patients who have "good" social characteristics, such as having a spouse, support, integration, perceived good health, good mental health, low stress, and education, it was also better for those patients who had "poor" physical characteristics such as a history of angina, a history of MI, and low physical function. In the multivariate analysis, older age was also associated with good adherence. These observations are not necessarily intuitive and support the need for further research in this area. If patients at risk for poor adherence can be identified prospectively, strategies may be developed to improve their subsequent medical care in such a way to favorably affect and improve their outcomes.

Clinical trial enrollers vs. nonenrollers: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT) project.

The Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT) was a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-sponsored substudy to the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Two-hundred-sixty (260) patients who enrolled in CAST and 140 partially or fully eligible patients who did not enroll were compared across several parameters, including demographic variables, disease severity, psychosocial functioning, health beliefs, recruitment experience, and understanding of informed consent procedures used in CAST. Significant predictors of enrollment included several demographic variables (e.g., being male, not having medical insurance), episodes of ventricular tachycardia, and health beliefs (e.g., extra beats are harmful, a higher degree of general health concern). Enrollment was higher for those who read and understood the informed consent and those who were initially recruited after hospital discharge, particularly nondepressed patients. In the multivariate model, the key variables that emerged were the patient's reading of the informed consent form and the patient's lack of medical insurance. These results suggest that (1) the clinical trial staff's interaction with the patient and the time when recruitment is initiated contribute significantly to the decision to enroll; and (2) it may be a greater challenge to motivate patients to enroll in future clinical trials if health care reform improves access to medical insurance coverage. Some of the significant variables are modifiable, suggesting interventions that may increase enrollment rates in future trials.

Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID)--rationale, design, and methods.

The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) study compares a strategy of initial treatment with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to a strategy of initial treatment with an antiarrhythmic drug to prevent death in patients with a history of ventricular fibrillation or hemodynamically compromising ventricular tachycardia, or both. Neither arrhythmia can have been due to a transient or correctable cause. The principle exclusions are a contraindication to amiodarone therapy and inability to undergo ICD implantation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy includes empiric amiodarone and guided sotalol. The ICDs allowed are advanced generation devices, and most are implanted transvenously. The primary end point of the study is total mortality. Secondary end points are cost and quality of life. The study was designed in 2 phases. The pilot phase enrolled 200 patients between June 1993 and June 1994. Data collected during the pilot phase confirmed that the trial is feasible. An additional 1,000 patients will be enrolled between June 1994 and March 1997. It is anticipated that all 1,200 patients will be followed until September 1998, and will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

Moricizine and quality of life in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial II (CAST II).

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial II (CAST II) was a double-masked placebo-controlled randomized trial that compared the survival effects of moricizine to placebo in postmyocardial infarction arrhythmia patients. The quality-of-life outcome measures were designed prospectively for CAST and were previously shown to have high reliability and clinical discriminative validity. The CAST quality-of-life instrument detected significant differences between moricizine and placebo. In particular, moricizine was most strongly associated with inferior social activity and satisfaction scores (p = .014) and lower scores for overall contentment with life (p = .007). Moreover, the quality-of-life measures improved significantly for both the moricizine and placebo treatment groups after entry into the clinical trial. These results indicate that the CAST quality-of-life instrument is sensitive for assessing pharmacological therapies in the treatment of heart disease.

Psychosocial predictors of mortality in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-1 (CAST-1).

Psychosocial variables predict the recurrence of clinical events in symptomatic patients, controlling for measures of disease severity. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial-1, a pharmacologic test of the arrhythmia suppression and mortality hypothesis among postmyocardial infarction patients, allowed a prospective test of the relationship of distress, perceived support, social interaction, life stress, and other variables, to mortality, adjusting statistically for ejection fraction, arrhythmia rates, and other known risk factors for coronary heart disease. Results indicated that the treatment medications, encainide and flecainide, were powerful predictors of mortality. Although the psychosocial variables were significant as univariate predictors, these variables were not significant as predictors in a multivariate model that included drug treatment. When the data analysis was restricted to patients randomized to placebo, thereby eliminating the antiarrhythmic drug effect, the level of perceived social support was a significant multivariate predictor of mortality, adjusting for measures of disease severity. The adjusted hazards ratio for a 1-point decrease in the perceived support score is equal to 1.46, based on the multivariate model.

The integration of health quality of life in clinical research: experiences from cardiovascular clinical trials.

Health Quality of Life (HQL) assessment in clinical trial and epidemiological research is necessary to determine the efficacy of treatments and interventions. A definition of HQL is presented with the following dimensions of HQL identified: social, physical, and neuropsychological functioning; emotional stability; personal productivity; and intimacy. A strategy for selecting HQL dimensions and measures is discussed and includes consideration of the study population, the intervention(s), and the clinical trial design. Examples from NHLBI-sponsored clinical trials illustrate how HQL measures are selected as well as the goals that HQL assessment can address. That is, the authors discuss how HQL data can be used to characterize the study populations, determine the effects of HQL on critical outcomes, and assess how treatment affects overall HQL and specific dimensions of HQL.

Statistical problems in the design of antiarrhythmic drug trials.

Although many aspects of design, monitoring, and analysis in trials of antiarrhythmic drugs are similar to those of other intervention studies, several features are different. These include decisions on how to identify the subjects, timing of the intervention with respect to the disease process, time of randomization, methods for measurement of outcome, and interim monitoring for harm or benefit. The resolution of these issues depends almost entirely on the specification of the question of interest.

Relation of psychosocial and stress reactivity variables to ventricular arrhythmias in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS).

Both animal and human data implicate psychosocial distress and cardiovascular reactivity in response to challenge in the etiology of sudden cardiac death. In this study, the relation of these biobehaviorial factors to frequency of ventricular premature complexes, a predictor of sudden death was investigated. The study population was made up of patients enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS). Ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) were assessed by multiple, 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings. Patients completed trait psychosocial measures assessed at baseline and state psychosocial measures assessed periodically during a 1-year follow-up period. Psychosocial measures included self-reports of depression, anxiety, anger and type A behavior pattern. A competitive challenge using a video game was used as a stressor to elicit cardiovascular reactivity and was administered at baseline and during follow-up sessions. Cardiovascular reactivity was defined as peak level during stressor exposure minus the mean of resting levels for systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Results indicated that biobehavioral factors were not associated with diurnal VPC rates. Furthermore, biobehavioral factors did not predict response to antiarrhythmic therapy. Based upon the results of this study, it is speculated that the established relation between behavioral factors and sudden death may not be mediated by VPC rates.