Low-Fidelity, In-Situ Pediatric Resuscitation Simulation Improves RN Competence and Self-Efficacy.

PROBLEM: ED staff lack adequate exposure to critical pediatric patients to develop competence and confidence in resuscitation scenarios. Simulations of various designs have shown success at increasing health care staff performance and self-efficacy. METHODS: We developed a nurse-led, low-fidelity in situ simulation of a pediatric sepsis scenario. The primary goal was to improve staff adherence to resuscitation guidelines, as measured by the Clinical Performance Tool, a set of checklists designed to measure adherence to Pediatric Advanced Life Support algorithms by multidisciplinary teams during simulations. The secondary goal was to improve staff confidence, measured by the Confidence Scale, a 5-item Likert-type scale that can measure any psychomotor skill. RESULTS: A total of 43 RNs participated in 12 simulations over a period of 3 months. Mean Clinical Performance score improved by 74%, from 5.3 to 9.2 (P < 0.001). Mean confidence score for RNs improved by 56%, from 2.48 (standard deviation [SD] 0.83) to 3.88 (SD 0.66) (P < 0.001). Several systems issues were identified and addressed by multidisciplinary teams, such as increasing respiratory therapist response to the emergency department and updating of the Broselow cart. DISCUSSION: In situ low-fidelity simulations led by RNs contributed to significant improvement in adherence to resuscitation guidelines and in staff confidence. The simulation design had minimal impact on staffing and budget and enabled identification and correction of systems issues.

Interfacility Transfer is Associated With Lower Mortality in Undertriaged Gunshot Wound Patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment at a Level I trauma center yields better outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe injury as compared with treatment in nontrauma centers. We examined the association between interfacility transfer to a level I or II trauma center and mortality for gunshot wound patients, among patients initially transported to a lower level or undesignated facility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients from the National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2015) with firearm as the external cause of injury, who met CDC criteria for emergency medical services triage to a higher level (American College of Surgeons [ACS] Level II or above) trauma center. We compared outcomes between patients (a) treated in an ACS level III or below facility and not transferred versus (b) transferred to an ACS level II or above facility, adjusting for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Of the total 62,277 patients, 10,968 (17.6%) were transferred to a level II center or above, and 51,309 (82.4%) were treated at a level III or below or undesignated center. In adjusted analysis comparing transferred versus not transferred patients, risk was lower for mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95 P = 0.011) but similar for any complication (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.25 P = 0.87) and the five most common complications. Results were consistent when accounting for data missing at random, and when including state trauma center designations in the definition of Level II or greater versus III and below. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found lower mortality but similar complication risk associated with interfacility transfer for undertriaged gunshot wound patients. This suggests that transfer to a higher level center is warranted among these patients, with improved care potentially outweighing potential harms because of transfer.

Differences in trauma mortality between ACS-verified and state-designated trauma centers in the US.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury is a leading cause of deaths worldwide, and designated trauma centers are crucial to preventing these. In the US, trauma centers can be designated as level I-IV by states and/or the American College of Surgeons (ACS), reflecting the resources available for care. We examined whether state- and ACS-verified facilities of the same level (I-IV) had differences in mortality, complications, and disposition, and whether differences varied by center level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using all admissions reported to the National Trauma Data Bank 2010-2015, we estimated risk ratios for the association between current ACS verification (vs. state designation) and patient mortality and complications, adjusting for trauma level and facility, injury, and demographic characteristics. We tested the interaction between trauma level and ACS verification, stratifying by trauma level in the presence of significant statistical interaction. RESULTS: Overall, patients admitted to ACS-verified vs state-designated facilities had similar adjusted mortality risk [RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.03] and lower risk of discharge to intermediate care facilities [RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.78]. However, Level III and IV facilities had lower adjusted mortality risk when ACS-verified, with much lower mortality risk in ACS-verified Level IV facilities [RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.54]. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that while outcomes are similar between ACS-verified and state-designated Level I and II centers, state-designated Level III and particularly Level IV centers show poorer outcomes relative to their ACS-verified counterparts. Further research could explore mechanisms for these differences, or inform potential changes to state designation processes for lower-level centers.

Lack of Health Insurance Associated With Lower Probability of Head Computed Tomography Among United States Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

BACKGROUND: Uninsured traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients have higher mortality than their insured counterparts. One possible reason is disparities in receipt of appropriate diagnostic imaging. OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between lack of insurance and use of diagnostic imaging. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: All adult patients admitted with severe (AIS>4 and GCS<15) TBI, in the National Trauma Data Bank 2010-2015. MEASURES: Primary outcome was receipt of head computed tomography (CT) and number of CT scans received. Secondary outcomes included head x-ray, angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were classified as uninsured if their payment method was self-pay or not billed. RESULTS: Of 59,540 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 18.9% were uninsured. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and facility characteristics, compared with patients with any insurance, 4.47 per 100 (95% confidence interval, 1.60-7.34) fewer uninsured patients had a head CT, with uninsured patients receiving 13% (95% confidence interval, 3-21) fewer head CTs. There were no differences in x-ray, angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging receipt. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest lower receipt of guideline-indicated head CT among uninsured TBI patients. Mechanisms could include unconscious provider bias or institutional financial constraints. Further research is warranted to elucidate mechanisms and assess mediation by diagnostic imaging use of the insurance-mortality association.

Seatbelt use is associated with lower risk of high-grade hepatic injury in motor vehicle crashes in a national sample.

BACKGROUND: Seatbelt use, alone and in conjunction with an airbag, is associated with lower risk of mortality, blunt abdominal trauma and kidney injury in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). However, the effect of these protective devices on risk of severe liver injury is not well characterised. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patient admissions with liver injuries from MVCs from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), collected from 2010 to 2015 in the USA. We examined associations between injury severity and seatbelt use and airbag presence individually and in the presence of additive interaction. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications and discharge disposition. RESULTS: We analysed 55 543 records from the National Trauma Data Bank. In adjusted analysis, seatbelt use alone was protective against severe (AAST VI or above) hepatic injury (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.84), while airbag presence alone was not (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.12). The joint association of seatbelt use and airbag presence with injury severity was greater than seatbelts alone (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.79), with 13% of the joint lower risk attributable to interaction (95% CI 3% to 24%). The adjusted mortality risk of those without protective devices (10.3%, n=2297) was nearly double that of patients who used a seatbelt in conjunction with a present airbag (5.3%, n=699, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Seatbelts are associated with lower liver injury severity and are more protective with airbags present, while airbags without seatbelt use were not protective against severe injury among patients with liver injury.

Improving Thermoregulation for Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department: An Evidence-Based Practice Project.

Extensive evidence exists on the association between hypothermia and increased morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Gaps in practice related to temperature assessment have been identified in literature, along with limited personnel knowledge regarding management of patients with accidental hypothermia. An interdisciplinary team identified gaps in practice in our institution regarding temperature assessment and documentation of rewarming and initiated an evidence-based practice project to change practice at our institution. The goals were to decrease time to temperature assessment, increase core temperature assessment, and increase implementation of appropriate rewarming methods. This project used the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to provide a framework for execution and evaluation. We conducted a literature review to address all aspects of hypothermia, including incidence, associated and contributing factors, prevention, recognition, and treatment. This evidence-based knowledge was then applied to clinical practice through staff education and training, equipment availability, and environmental adjustments. More patients with hypothermia and hyperthermia were identified in 2017, as compared with 2016. There was a significant increase in core temperature assessment from 4% in 2016 to 23% in 2017 (p < .001). Blanket use in normothermic patients increased in 2017 (p = .002). This project is an example of how nurses can utilize an evidence-based practice model to translate research into clinical practice. Best practice interventions regarding temperature assessment and rewarming measures for trauma patients can be successfully implemented with negligible cost. Further research should be dedicated to examine barriers to implementation and adherence to evidence-based practice interventions.

Clinical and Antibiotic Management of Urinary Tract Infections Pre- and Postimplementation of the CLINITEK AUWi System From Siemens to Screen Out Negative Urine Samples Submitted for Culture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patterns of inpatient and outpatient antibiotic use between patients who awaited urine culture results and patients whose urine specimens had been submitted for culture and were screened using the CLINITEK AUWi System. METHODS: This quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study included patient records with a urine specimen and hospital admission from 1 month before to 1 month after implementation of the system. We compared data from the pre- and postimplementation groups using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A similar proportion of patients in the pre- and postimplementation groups were prescribed antibiotics (71.2% vs 80.0%; P = .45); the postimplementation group had a significantly shorter length of stay in hours (median, 226 vs 123; P = .005). The median inpatient antibiotic treatment duration was lower for those in the postimplementation group; however, the duration of outpatient antibiotic treatment was longer. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that screening specimens using the CLINITEK AUWi System may reduce the excess administration of antibiotics.

Access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception: results from a mystery caller study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception (PCC) and identify barriers to obtaining this contraceptive method. STUDY DESIGN: We used a "mystery caller" approach to survey primary care, family planning, and Ob/Gyn clinics in nine U.S. cities, identified via online search. A single researcher called 199 clinics, assuming the role of a patient seeking the copper IUD for PCC. Using a standard script, the researcher collected information regarding access to the copper IUD and respondent's knowledge of the copper IUD's indication for PCC. The primary outcome was availability of the copper IUD as PCC. Secondary outcomes included any provision of the copper IUD, awareness of the copper IUD's indication for use as PCC, and offering accurate information regarding the copper IUD as PCC. Fisher's exact test was used to compare outcomes by clinic type. RESULTS: Two thirds (68%) of primary care clinics, 87% of family planning clinics, and all Ob/Gyn clinics offered the copper IUD (p<.001). Only 11% of primary care clinics, however, were aware of the copper IUD's use as PCC, as compared with 63% of family planning clinics and 24% of Ob/Gyn clinics (p<.001). Few primary care or Ob/Gyn clinics offered the copper IUD as PCC, while 49% of family planning clinics did so (p<.001). CONCLUSION: Access to the copper IUD as PCC is limited and varies by clinic type. Knowledge gaps exist regarding the use of the copper IUD as PCC, as well as regarding the general medical guidelines for copper IUD placement. IMPLICATIONS: A majority of primary care and Ob/Gyn clinics do not offer the copper IUD as PCC, and only about half of family planning clinics do so. Barriers included lack of knowledge, unavailability of device, unavailability of an appointment with a trained provider, and outdated IUD provision protocols.

Comparison of patient hospital length of stay pre and post implementation of the CLINITEK AUWi System from Siemens to screen out negative urine samples intended for culture: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of using the CLINITEK AUWi System to screen out negative urine samples intended for culture on patient length of stay and culture results at a community teaching hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort design to compare length of stay for patients admitted before and after implementation of the CLINITEK AUWi System to screen urine samples prior to culture. Before implementation, all urine samples were sent to an external laboratory for culture. After implementation, urine samples were screened first, and culture was only performed for those samples above the 325 bacteria/µl cutoff. We assessed patient length of stay before and after implementation. RESULTS: Our study included 306 samples (168 pre, 138 post). In the post-implementation group, 60.9% of cultures were screened negative and not sent for culture, resulting in fewer negative culture results (74.4% vs 40.7%, p<0.001). Median overall length of stay was reduced from 176 h (IQR 234.75) to 128.5 h (IQR 192.5, p=0.018), a decrease of over 40 h. Differences in length of stay were especially pronounced among female patients, patients aged 80 or over, and patients with urinary tract disorder in the diagnostic differential. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the CLINITEK AUWi System reduced the need for culture by screening out 60.9% of samples as negative, and was associated with a shorter mean length of stay. Our findings have implications for cost savings, due to both the reduced length of stay and the reduced need for culture.

A Review of Contraception and Abortion Content in Family Medicine Textbooks.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family physicians are critical providers of reproductive health care in the United States, and family physicians and trainees refer to textbooks as a source of clinical information. This study evaluates the coverage of reproductive health topics in current family medicine textbooks. METHODS: We identified 12 common family medicine textbooks through a computerized literature search and through the recommendations of a local family medicine clerkship and evaluated 24 areas of reproductive health content (comprising contraceptive care, management of early pregnancy loss, and provision of induced abortion) for accuracy and thoroughness using criteria that we created based on the latest guidelines. RESULTS: All contraceptive methods evaluated were addressed in more than half of the textbooks, though discrepancies existed by method, with intrauterine devices (IUDs), external (male) condoms, and diaphragms addressed most frequently (10/12 texts) and male and female sterilization addressed least frequently (8/12 texts). While most contraceptive methods, when addressed, were usually addressed accurately, IUDs were often addressed inaccurately. Coverage of early pregnancy loss management was limited to 7/12 texts, and coverage of early abortion methods was even more limited, with only 4/12 texts addressing the topic. CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine textbooks do not uniformly provide correct and thorough information on reproductive health topics relevant to family medicine, and attention is needed to ensure that family physicians are receiving appropriate information and training to meet the reproductive health needs of US women.

IUD knowledge and experience among family medicine residents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective contraceptive method with few contraindications; however, clinician lack of training in insertion and misconceptions about IUD risks are barriers to utilization. Previous research has shown gaps in IUD training in family medicine residency programs. METHODS: An online survey addressing experience with IUD insertion, knowledge of patient eligibility and IUD risks, and intent to insert IUDs in practice was circulated to residents at 15 US family medicine residency programs. Programs were eligible to participate if they were receiving funding to enhance training in family planning and abortion care and interested in additional support to enhance IUD training. RESULTS: The overall response rate for the surveys was 76.1% (332/436). Experience with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was more common than with the copper IUD. Residents performed well on knowledge questions, but many would not insert in common patient scenarios in which insertion was not contraindicated, including a history of sexually transmitted infection in the past 6 months (48.2% would not insert), a history of ectopic pregnancy (37.0%), no pap smear in the past year (30.7%), or if the patient was not in a monogamous relationship (29.2%). The vast majority of residents (88.7%) reported that they were likely or very likely to provide IUDs in their future family medicine practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although residents overwhelmingly expressed interest in providing IUDs after residency, our results suggest that additional clinical and didactic training is needed, particularly interventions targeted at dispelling misconceptions about patient eligibility for IUDs.

Management of early pregnancy failure and induced abortion by family medicine educators.

BACKGROUND: Reproductive health care, including treatment of early pregnancy failure (EPF) and induced abortion, is an integral part of patient-centered care provided by family physicians, but data suggest that comprehensive training is not widely available to family medicine residents. The purpose of this study was to assess EPF and induced abortion management practices and attitudes of family medicine physician educators throughout the United States and Canada. METHODS: These data were collected as part of a cross-sectional survey conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance that was distributed via E-mail to 3152 practicing physician members of Council of Academic Family Medicine organizations. RESULTS: The vast majority of respondents (88.2%) had treated EPF, whereas few respondents (15.3%) had provided induced medication or aspiration abortions. Of those who had treated EPF, most had offered medication management (72.7%), whereas a minority had provided aspiration management (16.4%). Almost all respondents (95%) agreed that EPF management is within the scope of family medicine, and nearly three-quarters (73.2%) agreed that early induced abortion is within the scope of family medicine. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that family physician educators are more experienced with EPF management than elective abortion. Given the overlap of skills needed for provision of these services, there is the potential to increase the number of family physician faculty members providing induced abortions.