The Global Bioequivalence Harmonisation Initiative (GBHI): Report of the fifth international EUFEPS/AAPS conference.

The series of conferences of the Global Bioequivalence Harmonisation Initiative (GBHI) was started in 2015 by the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS). All GBHI meetings so far were co-organised together with the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS). Beginning with the 3rd workshop US-FDA joined as co-sponsor - to support global harmonisation of regulatory recommendations for bioequivalence (BE) assessment. At the 5th GBHI conference, the following BE topics were intensively discussed, and the following main conclusions were drawn: (1) Statistical considerations for BE assessment in specific situations covering scaling approaches for highly variable drug (HVD) products, two-stage adaptive design and opportunities of modelling and simulation to support BE: even though special BE study concepts like adaptive designs are not often used in practise so far, a majority of the workshop participants were in favour of a more frequent application of such approaches. The regulatory conditions relevant in this context need further concretisation and harmonisation between the regions. Moreover, modelling and simulation were considered as a promising and evolving approach, also for BE development programmes. (2) Fed versus fasting conditions in BE trials: Findings that BE between generic products could be confirmed only after fasted administration but failed under fed conditions seem more an exception than the rule. Obviously, BCS class IV compounds are most problematic in this context. Differences in critical excipients such as surfactants or pH-modifiers may be relevant reasons for different sensitivity for interactions in fasted versus fed conditions. Consequently, such deviations in composition of generic preparations should be avoided. Moreover, confirmation of BE may be generally difficult comparing different dosage forms, such like capsules versus tablets, especially in fed state. (3) BE assessment of locally acting drug products applied topically to the skin: Appropriateness and potential benefit of in-vitro tests as alternatives to clinical efficacy studies have been comprehensively discussed. In addition to the already well-established in-vitro release and permeation tests, other techniques were suggested, e.g., Raman spectroscopy or dermal open flow microperfusion. Validation of those methods is challenging and, despite significant progress already achieved during previous years, more research is needed before they may be fully accepted for regulatory purposes. (4) BE evaluation of narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drugs: The discrepancies amongst regulatory agencies in necessity of tighter BE acceptance ranges, the recommendations for inclusion of peak and total drug exposure into BE assessment with more restrictive criteria and the importance of comparison of the product-related within-subject variability for NTI drugs were debated. Arguments in favour and against the different approaches were presented and discussed but need further consideration before harmonisation can be achieved. The highly interactive meeting and extensive exchange between regulators and scientists from industry and academia resulted in useful progress in open BE issues and supported the goal of science-driven harmonisation.

Differences in bioavailability between 60 mg of nifedipine osmotic push-pull systems after fasted and fed administration.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the bioavailability of two osmotically active formulations of 60 mg nifedipine, Gen-Nifedipine extended release Test tablets (Genpharm ULC, Etobicoke, ON, Canada) and Adalat XL Reference tablets (Bayer Healthcare AG, Leverkusen, Germany) after single dose fasted and fed administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed following a 4-period crossover design with both investigational products obtained from marketed batches. The complete pharmacokinetic evaluation was carried out in 26 healthy male subjects with a median age of 29.5 years (range 18 - 44 years), mean weight of 79.7 kg (range 66.0 - 97.5 kg), and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.1 kg/m(2) (range 22.1 - 26.9 kg/m(2)). Tablets were administered with tap water either under fasting conditions or immediately following a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast. Blood samples were taken predose and at pre-defined time points until 48 h post dosing. Samples were protected from light during handling and frozen until analysis. A validated LC-MS/MS method was used for the quantification of nifedipine in plasma samples. All kinetic parameters were determined model-independently for each treatment directly from measured concentrations. Monitoring of subject safety was accomplished by routine monitoring of blood pressure, heart rate and probing for adverse events. RESULTS: In-vitro dissolution curves show later onset and considerably lower quantity of nifedipine release from Test compared to Reference tablets. Under fasting conditions total and maximum exposure, represented by geometric mean AUC(0-tlast)- and C(max)-values, respectively were 466.7 h*ng/ml (AUC(0-tlast)) and 21.9 ng/ml (C(max)) for Test and 507.8 h*ng/ml (AUC(0-tlast)) and 22.0 ng/ml (C(max)) for Reference tablets. However, the Test product exhibited a notably longer lag-time and less rapid onset of absorption than the Reference tablets. Moreover, the plateau phase is maintained for about 14 hours on Test but for almost 20 hours on Reference. Point estimates (PE) and associated 90% confidence intervals (CI) were determined as 91.8% and 79.9 - 105.5% for AUC(0-tlast), as well as 99.8% and 88.6 - 112.4% for C(max). Larger differences were found for AUC(0-9h) (PE: 54.8%; CI: 45.8 - 65.5%) determined as parameter for early exposure. Under fed conditions, although the mean plasma concentration time curves look similar in shape, concentrations of Test compared to Reference tablets are considerably lower at all time points until 36 hours after dosing. Again the lag time in onset of drug absorption is notably longer for the Test product. Both, total and maximum exposure, represented by geometric mean values for AUC(0-tlast) and C(max), were considerably lower (differences also statistically significant) after administration of Test with 481.8 h*ng/ml for AUC(0-tlast) and 25.3 ng/ml for C(max) in comparison to Reference tablets with 595.9 h*ng/ml for AUC(0-tlast) and 31.9 ng/ml for C(max). Test/Reference point estimates (PE) and associated 90% confidence intervals (CI) were determined as 80.7% and 73.7 - 88.5% for AUC(0-tlast), as well as 79.6% and 70.3 - 90.0% for C(max). Differences were also even more expressed for AUC(0-9h) (PE: 54.9%; CI: 47.4 - 63.5%) determined as parameter for early exposure. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that although both products are osmotic release systems they are not bioequivalent according to the accepted standards. This difference between both osmotic delivery systems might be substantiated by the fact that the core of the Test product is designed as a monolayer system (containing both, the active ingredient and the osmotic component) while Reference tablets consist of two separate layers. The observed pharmacokinetic differences may have an impact on blood pressure control in patients and thus, should be kept in mind when switching during treatment.

Phenotyping with sulfasalazine - time dependence and relation to NAT2 pharmacogenetics.

OBJECTIVE: N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genotype-phenotype relation with sulfasalazine as probe drug by means of detailed genotype analysis and kinetic data evaluation. BACKGROUND: Though phenotype analysis of sulfasalazine metabolism has been described before, genotype investigations in this regard are scarce. The influence of different single point mutations on the metabolism of the sulfasalazine metabolite sulfapyridine (SP) should give more insight into the functionality of different alleles especially with those still under discussion. METHODS: In two bioavailability studies performed under comparable conditions with 24 healthy subjects of both genders equally distributed, plasma levels of SP and acetylsulfapyridine (Ac-SP) were determined after oral intake of enteric coated formulations of sulfasalazine (500 mg and 1,000 mg, respectively). The resulting metabolic ratios were calculated. NAT2 genotype was analyzed in parallel for all subjects deducing haplotype set as well as putative functional phenotype as (homozygous or heterozygous) rapid acetylator (RA) or slow acetylator (SA) and correlated with the PK results. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: RA genotype in the overall study population was seen with 45.5% (including 6.8% homozygous wildtype *4/*4) and SA genotype with 54.5%. Compared to RA genotype, apparent terminal elimination half-life of SP as well as of Ac-SP was prolonged in the SA genotype population, C(max) and AUC values of SP were higher whereas average C(max) value of Ac-SP was lower (with AUC only some tendency to lower values). In general, phenotype-genotype correlation was good with only few exceptions. Strongest functional effect on enzyme activity was noticed in slow acetylators carrying the 341T > C mutation, followed by 590G > A mutation whereas the influence of 857G > A was considerably less pronounced. Homozygous 803A > G mutation (lysine > arginine shift) did not reveal enzyme activity reduction.

Characterization of the behavior of alginate-based microcapsules in vitro and in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: Functional formulations providing protection of nutritional products against gastric juice or a capable of delivering them to distinct areas of the gastrointestinal tract are increasingly utilized by the food industry. However, the application of functional excipients that are established in pharmaceutical applications is limited in case of food products, as they are typically not classified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). MATERIALS: Accordingly, we investigated whether two alginate-based microcapsule preparations (capsule diameter 1 - 2 mm) either based on alginate and maize starch (MS-type) or alginate and casein (OCF27-type) and both created from ingredients classified as food supplements provide functional properties with respect to regional gastrointestinal targeting. METHODS: For this purpose the in vitro disintegration and swelling of the microcapsules was tested in various media. Furthermore, individual microcapsules, magnetically labelled with 100 - 200 microg black iron oxide, were ingested by healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. Gastrointestinal transit as well as the gastrointestinal disintegration behavior were determined by using Magnetic Marker Monitoring. RESULTS: The results of in vitro and in vivo investigations show that both types of microcapsules are resistant to gastric juice for approximately 10 hrs under fasting and fed conditions. However, the disintegration characteristics of the two types of microcapsules within the intestines are different. CONCLUSION: Whilst the MS-type of capsules disintegrated predominantly within the small intestine shortly after gastric emptying, the OCF27-type of capsules underwent a rather slow disintegration predominantly in the colon.

Significance of the biopharmaceutical properties of tramadol sustained-release formulations for chrono-pharmacologically optimized treatment of pain from various sources.

UNLABELLED: Tramadol is currently one of the most frequently used opioid analgesics in the world. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the rate and extent of tramadol bioavailability following evening versus morning intake of an extended-release pellet system designed for once daily administration. Moreover, the suitability of the preparation for chrono-adjusted pharmacotherapy was to be investigated. METHODS: 18 male and female volunteers were enrolled in the study and treated with 200 mg tramadol extended-release capsules, which were to be taken in the fasted state between 7:30 and 8:00 a.m. or p.m., respectively. The parent compound and its O-desmethyl-metabolite were analyzed in plasma samples using a LC-MS/MS procedure. RESULTS: Maximum exposure of tramadol (geometric means of C(max)-values) was determined as 289.3 ng/ml after morning and 283.1 ng/ml after evening administration. Extent of tramadol exposure (geometric means of AUC(0-48)-values) was calculated as 4,802.5 ng x h/ml after morning and 4,767.0 ng x h/ml after evening administration. Also tmax-values were comparable after morning and evening administration (9.00 vs. 9.50 hours). Statistical analyses, based on conventional bioequivalence approach, revealed no evidence of any impact of the time-point of administration on the biopharmaceutical performance of the dosage form investigated here. CONCLUSIONS: Bioavailability of the extended-release tramadol capsules for once daily administration is not affected by the time-point of administration. Total and maximum exposure of the product was bioequivalent after intake in the morning and at night. Thus, the time-point of administration may be adjusted to the patient's needs without any significant change in the in-vivo performance.

[Importance of the formulation for a chronopharmacologically optimised way of pain therapy. Results of a comparative bioavailability study of tramadol extended-release capsules after single-dose evening versus morning administration]. / Bedeutung der Galenik in der "chrono- adjustierten" Schmerzbehandlung. Ergebnisse einervergleichenden Bioverfügbarkeitsuntersuchung mit einem Tramadol- Retardpräparat nach Einmalgabe am Abend und am Morgen.

UNLABELLED: Objective of this study was to investigate the rate and extent of tramadol bioavailability following evening versus morning administration. METHODS: The study was performed following an open, randomised, cross-over study-design. 18 male and female volunteers were enrolled into the study and treated with 200 mg tramadol extended-release capsules (T-long), which were to be taken either in the morning or in the evening. RESULTS: Plasma concentration versus time profiles obtained after morning and evening administration were almost superimposable for both, tramadol and its active metabolite. Maximum exposure of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol (geometric means of c(max)-values) as well as extent of exposure (geometric means of AUC(0-48)-values) were comparable after morning and eveningadministration. CONCLUSIONS: Time-point of administration does not have any relevant impact on the rate and extent of absorption in the investigated dosage form. Thus, time-point of administration may be adjusted to the patient's need in a chronopharmacologically optimised way for pain therapy.

Significant food interactions observed with a nifedipine modified-release formulation marketed in the European Union.

The objective of this study was to compare the rate and extent of nifedipine bioavailability after single dose administration of Adalat OROS 30 (Reference) and Nifedipine Sandoz retard 30 tablets (Test). Both modified release formulations are marketed in Member States of the European Union. Prior to the clinical study the in vitro dissolution characteristics were investigated. There was a significant pH dependency observed with the Test product but drug release with the Reference product was almost independent of the experimental conditions used. In the subsequent open, randomized, controlled, 4-way crossover study both pharmaceutical products were administered to 28 healthy male volunteers, either after fasting overnight or immediately after a high-fat American breakfast. Blood sampling was performed over 48 hours post-dose for the determination of pharmacokinetic profiles of nifedipine. Considerable differences were observed between the two formulations when administered to fasted subjects where maximum nifedipine plasma concentration (C(max)) were higher in the case of the Test formulation. Differences were even more pronounced after a high-fat American breakfast. Under these conditions a significant food interaction was detected in the case of Nifedipine Sandoz retard 30 with a three-fold increase in the mean C(max) when compared to values obtained in fasting subjects. In contrast, food intake had no clinically relevant effect on bioavailability of nifedipine (rate and extent) in the case of Adalat OROS 30. The pharmacokinetic findings in this study were reflected in the adverse event pattern which indicated a potential tolerability problem in the case of Nifedipine Sandoz retard 30. The results confirm the relationship between the in vitro dissolution profile results and the effects of the drug in vivo. Dose dumping after intake of a high-fat meal could be shown. Nifedipine Sandoz retard 30 is not bioequivalent to Adalat OROS 30 and produced highly variable and poorly predictable nifedipine plasma concentrations. The differences observed between the two products investigated may have direct therapeutic relevance when switching from one formulation to the other and, in particular, when administration conditions change i.e. administration in the fasting state and administration with a meal, since the pharmacological and therapeutic actions of nifedipine are closely associated with the concentration.

[New guidelines for the assessment of bioavailability and bioequivalence]. / Neue Richtlinien für die Beurteilung der Bioverfügbarkeit/Bioäquivalenz.

Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies are essential in the clinical development of medicinal products and the optimization of pharmaceutical forms. Bioavailability means the rate and extent to which the active substance or active moiety is absorbed from a pharmaceutical form and becomes available at the site of action. In practice, drug concentration-time courses are measured in the systemic circulation, and the area under the curve (AUC) as well as the observed maximum concentration (C(max)) are determined. Products are considered bioequivalent if their bioavailabilities after administration of the same molar doses are similar to such a degree that their effects, with respect to both efficacy and safety, will be essentially the same and thus, there are no relevant differences in terms of AUC and C(max). In 2002 a revised version of the 'Note for Guidance on the Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence' came into effect (CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98). Relevant changes in comparison to the previous version are: request for GLP-compliant bioanalytical measurements; for long half-life drugs a truncated AUC is acceptable; acceptance criteria for bioequivalence assessment and requirements for a waiver of bioequivalence studies were further specified. In this context the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) seems appropriate to decide whether in special cases of rapidly dissolving solid oral dosage forms a biowaiver may be granted or not. Products not considered critical in this matter are medicinal products for which the formulation does not affect the rate and extent of absorption, i. e. bioavailability, of the active moiety. Highly soluble (and highly permeable) drugs (BCS class I) are such candidates. Comprehensive state-of-the-art guidance on the design, conduct and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies is given in the current European guideline.

Felodipine quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.

A rapid, sensitive, robust and specific method was developed for the determination and quantitation of felodipine, in human blood plasma by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry using nimodipine as internal standard. Felodipine was extracted from 0.5 mL human plasma by use of a liquid/liquid procedure using diethyl ether/hexane (80/20, v/v) as eluent. The method included a chromatographic run of 5 min using a C(18) analytical column (100 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.) and the calibration curve was linear over the range from 0.02 to 10 ng mL(-1) (r(2) > 0.994). The between-run precision, determined as relative standard deviation of replicate quality controls, was 5.7% (0.06 ng mL(-1)), 7.1% (0.6 ng mL(-1)) and 6.8% (7.5 ng mL(-1)). The between-run accuracy was +/- 0.0, 2.1 and 3.1% for the above-mentioned concentrations, respectively.

Influence of pharmaceutical quality on the bioavailability of active components from Ginkgo biloba preparations.

To be effective, herbal medicinal products are expected to meet comparable standards concerning the assessment of efficacy, safety and biopharmaceutical quality as chemically defined synthetic drugs as food supplements. However, these requirements are often not fulfilled, particularly regarding the characterization of biopharmaceutical properties such as in-vitro dissolution and in-vivo bioavailability. With respect to the relevance of biopharmaceutical quality of herbal medicinal products, two different Ginkgo biloba brands (test product: Ginkgo biloba capsules; reference product: Ginkgold) were analysed for dissolution rates and bioavailability of the most relevant active ingredients. Dissolution rates at pH 1 and 4.5 were determined according to the USP 23. The relative bioavailability of ginkgolide A, ginkgolide B and bilobalide was investigated after single oral administration of 120 mg Ginkgo biloba extract as tablets or capsules. Bioavailability data (area under the curve and peak concentration in plasma) were clearly different and did not show bioequivalence of test and reference products. The slow in-vitro dissolution of the test product resulted in a large decrease in bioavailability. These results indicate for the first time that the pharmaceutical properties of a herbal medicinal product have a significant impact on the rate and extent of drug absorption, and very likely on efficacy in humans.

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine in two slow release formulations: pronounced lag-time after a high fat breakfast.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of concomitant food intake on the bioavailability of two nifedipine containing modified release dosage forms for once daily administration. The clinical study was performed to investigate the in vivo relevance of pH-dependent differences in the in vitro release properties of the two dosage forms. METHODS: This was a randomized, open, 4-way crossover study in 24 healthy, male subjects. Following an overnight fast of 12 h single doses of Adalat OROS or Slofedipine XL were administered either in the fasted state or immediately after a high fat American breakfast. Nifedipine plasma concentrations in samples obtained until 48 h after drug administration were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters was conducted model-independently. The two dosage forms as well as the two administration conditions were compared by calculating point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the relevant pharmacokinetic parameters. In vitro dissolution tests were performed using a paddle apparatus 3 acc. USP, a pharmacopoeial dissolution system consisting of reciprocating cylinders in flat-bottomed glass vessels, with various buffer systems covering the entire physiological pH-range of the gastrointestinal tract. RESULTS: After fasted administration the extent of bioavailability of nifedipine as characterized by AUC(0,infinity) was slightly lower for Slofedipine XL compared with Adalat OROS with a point estimate of 82.3% primarily resulting from pronounced differences in nifedipine concentrations during the first 15 h after administration. Accordingly, maximum plasma concentrations were lower after administration of Slofedipine XL compared with Adalat OROS (point estimate: 84.3%). Under fed conditions the differences in bioavailability between the two products as characterized by the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0,tn) and Cmax were greater than after fasting conditions with point estimates of 69.6% and 81.0%, respectively. However, most striking was a pronounced delay in nifedipine absorption observed under fed conditions after administration of Slofedipine XL which resulted in lag-times of more than 15 h in 15 out of 24 subjects. Owing to this lag-time under fed conditions the relative bioavailability of nifedipine from Slofedipine XL compared with Adalat OROS was only 28% over the intended dosing interval of 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a dosage form-dependent food interaction was observed which, under fed conditions, resulted in pronounced differences in the relative bioavailability of nifedipine between Slofedipine XL and Adalat OROS over the intended dosing interval of 24 h. The delay in nifedipine absorption when Slofedipine XL is administered after a high-fat breakfast may be explained by the formulation properties. Slofedipine XL is an erosive tablet with an acid resistant coating whereas Adalat OROS is designed with an osmotic push-pull system. Under fed conditions drug from the single unit enteric coated dosage form exhibits a delayed absorption probably due to an extensively prolonged gastric residence time which does not allow drug release, on the other hand the osmotically driven push-pull system is not sensitive to concomitant food intake. The observed phenomenon might be of therapeutic relevance. For example a change from taking Slofedipine XL in the fed to the fasted state might result in increased systemic concentrations of nifedipine.

Dosage form-related food interaction observed in a marketed once-daily nifedipine formulation after a high-fat American breakfast.

OBJECTIVE: Objective of the study was the comparison of two nifedipine sustained-release products marketed in Europe. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma-concentration curve (AUC) values were derived after administration of single doses (60 mg) of test product and reference product, both approved for once-a-day administration, to 24 healthy male volunteers either after an overnight fast or immediately after a high-fat American breakfast. The study was performed with a randomised, non-blinded, four-period crossover design. Within- and between-product comparisons were determined for fed versus fasted administration considering bioavailability and tolerability of all treatments. Furthermore, in vitro dissolution characteristics of both products were evaluated. METHODS: Plasma samples were assayed using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method, and resulting pharmacokinetic parameters were determined model independently according to international requirements and the current European guidelines. RESULTS: Under fasted conditions the comparison of test and reference products showed a similar extent of bioavailability with a mean ratio of AUC((0-)(infinity)()) of 99% [95% confidence interval (CI) 86%, 114%], but significantly higher C(max) values resulting in a mean ratio of 169% (95% CI 139%, 206%). Accordingly, mean residence time and half-value duration values were smaller for the test product than the reference product. Under fed conditions, a pronounced food effect could be observed for the test product resulting in a pronounced increase of C(max) values. The affiliating point estimate was calculated as 340% with a 95% CI of 279%, 413%. However no remarkable influence of food intake was observed for the reference product. CONCLUSION: Under fasting conditions the modified-release characteristics of the test product are less pronounced than the reference product. No relevant impact of food intake could be observed for the reference product when switching from fasted to fed state, whereas a significant loss of modified-release characteristics could be detected for the test product under fed conditions resulting in much higher maximum concentrations. Such a phenomenon has been described in literature as "dose-dumping effect".

Simultaneous determination of flupirtine and its major active metabolite in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A rapid, selective and sensitive HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of flupirtine and its active metabolite D-13223 in human plasma. The analytes and internal standard diphenhydramine were extracted from plasma samples by liquid-liquid extraction, and chromatographed on a C18 column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-water-formic acid (60:40:1, v/v/v), at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode via atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI). The method has a limit of quantitation of 10 ng/ml for flupirtine and 2 ng/ml for D-13223, using 0.5-ml plasma sample. The linear calibration curves were obtained in the concentration range of 10.0-1500.0 ng/ml for flupirtine and 2.0-300.0 ng/ml for D-13223. The intra- and inter-run precision (RSD), calculated from quality control (QC) samples was less than 7.2% for flupirtine and D-13223. The accuracy as determined from QC samples was less than 5% for the analytes. The overall extraction recoveries of flupirtine and D-13223 were determined to be about 66% and 78% on average, respectively. The method was applied for the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of flupirtine and active metabolite D-13223 in volunteers following peroral administration.

Biopharmaceutical characterisation of herbal medicinal products: are in vivo studies necessary?

Herbal medicinal products have to meet comparable standards concerning the assessment of efficacy, safety and (bio)pharmaceutical quality as chemically defined synthetic drugs. However, these requirements are not fulfilled for many herbal products so far, particularly regarding in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. The necessity of in vivo studies for a biopharmaceutical characterisation of the products depends on the solubility/permeability properties of the active drug ingredient as well as dissolution behaviour of the dosage form. Also, in the case of herbal medicinal products, a waiver of in vivo BA/BE studies is recommended as long as the active ingredient is highly soluble according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System and dissolution of the dosage form takes place rapidly (>85%/20 min) in physiological buffer systems (pH 1-8).

Lack of interaction between thioctic acid, glibenclamide and acarbose.

AIMS: Thioctic acid (TA), glibenclamide and acarbose are widely used to either alone or concomitantly treat patients suffering from noninsulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). This study systematically investigated drug-drug interactions between TA and glibenclamide and TA and acarbose. METHODS: Fourteen male and 10 female healthy volunteers participated a randomized, open three period cross over trial (treatments A-C) followed by a fourth period (treatment D). A baseline profile for plasma insulin and glucose concentrations, variables which served as pharmacodynamic measures, was assessed before entering the trial. Treatments were A=600 mg TA orally, B=3.5 mg glibenclamide orally, C=600 mg TA+3.5 mg glibenclamide, D=600 mg TA+50 mg acarbose. Time courses of R(+)-TA and S(-)-TA as well as glibenclamide concentrations were measured with specific analytical methods. RESULTS: There was no clinically relevant change of TA enantiomer pharmacokinetics by glibenclamide or acarbose. Also, glibenclamide pharmacokinetics were not altered by TA to a clinically meaningful extent. Plasma insulin and glucose concentrations did not indicate an interaction between TA and glibenclamide or TA and acarbose. Glibenclamide had the expected effect on insulin and glucose levels independent of comedication. There were only minor and short lasting adverse events with the majority being (expected) hypoglycaemic symptoms occurring during the treatments with glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of single doses of TA and glibenclamide or TA and acarbose does not appear to cause drug-drug interactions.

Bioavailability and selected pharmacokinetic parameters of clindamycin hydrochloride after administration of a new 600 mg tablet formulation.

The study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of clindamycin after administration of two oral clindamycin HCl formulations. A new tablet preparation containing 600 mg clindamycin (Clinda-saar 600, test) was compared to a marketed capsule containing 300 mg clindamycin (Sobelin 300, reference). Both preparations revealed comparable in vitro dissolution profiles with high batch conformity and homogeneity. Twenty healthy male volunteers received single doses of 600 mg clindamycin (test: 1 tablet, reference: 2 capsules) in an open, randomized, two-period crossover design. Blood samples were drawn up to 14 h p.a. and clindamycin plasma concentrations were measured using a sensitive and specific HPLC-UV method. Pharmacokinetic characteristics were similar for both preparations, arithmetic mean values (standard deviation) were computed as: AUC(0-infinity) 12.2 (4.2) and 13.1 (4.6) microg x h/ml, Cmax 3.1 (0.8) and 3.4 (0.8) microg/ml, t(max) 0.83 (0.24) and 0.85 (0.34) h, t(1/2) 2.3 (0.4) and 2.3 (0.6) h for test and reference, respectively. Mean relative bioavailability (point estimate) was 93% for AUC and 91% for Cmax. 90% confidence intervals for AUC and Cmax were within the predefined bioequivalence acceptance limits. Bioequivalence of test and reference preparations could be demonstrated. Single doses of 600 mg clindamycin orally were well tolerated without relevant differences between both preparations.

Bioequivalence study of two morphine extended release formulations after multiple dosing in healthy volunteers.

AIM: Two extended release (ER) formulations of morphine sulphate (30 mg each), Oramorph SR (test) and a marketed reference formulation (MST Mundipharma Retardtabletten), were investigated for their relative bioavailability at steady-state: METHODS: The study was designed as a single-centre, open-label, two-period crossover, pharmacokinetic comparison in 28 healthy male volunteers and was completed in 23 subjects. The determination of morphine and its metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide in plasma was done by HPLC with electrochemical detection after solid-phase extraction. RESULTS: Under steady-state conditions in the first dosing interval, mean maximum plasma concentrations for morphine were 19.1 ng/ml (CV% 41) for Oramorph SR 30 mg and 19.1 ng/ml (CV% 33) for MST-30 Mundipharma Retardtabletten. Geometric mean AUC(0-12) values were calculated as 108 ngxh/ml (CV% 40) for Oramorph SR 30 mg and as 118 ng x h/ml (CV% 30) for the reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of the major metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide, were found to be generally in a higher range compared to the parent compound. The 90% confidence intervals of test to reference ratios calculated for all relevant parameters (AUC, C(max), PTF) for both the parent compound and morphine-6-glucuronide were all within the limits of 80 - 125%. The most frequent adverse events (AE > 10%) during Oramorph SR 30 mg treatment were headache (36%), dizziness (18%), nausea (21%), vomiting (21%) and pruritus (11%). During treatment with MST-30 Mundipharma Retardtabletten, the most frequent AEs were headache (29%), dizziness (13%), nausea (29%) and vomiting (29%). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate bioequivalence of Oramorph SR 30 mg and MST-30 Mundipharma Retardtabletten.

Dose-proportionality of oral thioctic acid--coincidence of assessments via pooled plasma and individual data.

Thioctic acid (TA), a racemate of R-(+)- and S-(-)-enantiomers of alpha-lipoic acid, acts as a powerful lipophilic, free-radical scavenger and is used in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. This trial investigated the dose-linearity of enantiomer pharmacokinetics following the oral administration of single doses of 50 to 600 mg TA (formulation provided by ASTA (Medica)) in healthy volunteers. TA enantiomer concentrations in individual and pooled plasma samples were determined using enantioselective, high-performance liquid chromatography. TA was rapidly absorbed (tmax, 0.5 to 1 h). Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of the R-(+)-enantiomer were about 40-50% higher than those of the S-(-)-enantiomer (50 mg: 135.45 ng/ml R-(+)-TA, 67.83 ng/ml S-(-)-TA; 600 mg: 1812.32 ng/ml R-(+)-TA, 978.20 ng/ml S-(-)-TA; geometric means). The decline observed in the plasma concentration was steep (t1/2, 0.5 h). The dose-linearity and proportionality of pharmacokinetic parameters could be demonstrated on an intra-individual basis and for the group geometric means. An analysis of pooled plasma samples proved to be a suitable means for deriving reliable first-sight results prior to individual assessments.

The biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS): class III drugs - better candidates for BA/BE waiver?

Current guidelines (CPMP Note for Guidance in Europe and FDA Guidance for Industry in the USA) consider a waiver of bioavailability/bioequivalence studies for immediate release dosage forms of highly soluble, highly permeable drug substances (Class I according to the BCS). In this paper, a waiver of BA/BE studies is being proposed also for Class III compounds (high solubility and low permeability) in fast dissolving products without excipients which may modify gastro-intestinal transit or membrane permeation. This type of drug substance may be an even better candidate for a waiver as, in this case, bioavailability will not so much depend on the formulation characteristics, as on drug substance properties (e.g. permeability).

Bioavailability study of two carbamazepine containing sustained release formulations after multiple oral dose administration.

Carbamazepine (CAS 298-46-4), an iminostilbene derivative and a structural congener of the tricyclic antidepressant drugs, has been used in the treatment of epileptic seizures since 1963. The bioavailability/bioequivalence of a carbamazepine sustained release formulation (Timonil retard) was compared with a reference formulation in an open 2-period crossover study in 21 healthy male volunteers (including 1 drop-out) after multiple dose administration. During a run-in phase of 6 days the daily dose was gradually increased from 100 to 400 mg. On days 9 to 15, either the test or the reference formulation was administered twice daily, followed by a switch of preparation for a further 7 days of treatment (days 16 to 22). On the pharmacokinetic profiling days 15 and 22 blood samples were drawn over a 24-h period. In addition, blood samples were withdrawn before morning administrations for determination of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide trough values. Plasma concentrations of carbamazepine and its metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide were determined using a specific and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The results showed that autoinduction of carbamazepine metabolism under the chosen dosage regimen was complete within 14 days after start of treatment and that the criteria for bioequivalence were met. The 90% confidence intervals of all ratios were included by a range of 80-125% (AUC0-12: 103-120; AUC12-24: 105-119; Cmax0-12: 104-118; Cmax12-24: 104-118). During the study, 12 subjects experienced a total of 24 adverse events with mild to moderate intensity. Due to a significant increase of liver enzyme activity in serum during the course of the study, one subject was excluded from further study participation. There were no serious adverse events. It was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation with respect to rate and extent of absorption.