Effect of community educational interventions on rate of organ donation among Hispanic Americans.

IMPORTANCE: The need for suitable organs for transplantation is especially pronounced in minority populations such as Hispanic Americans owing to disproportionately high rates of diabetes mellitus and kidney disease. Considerable barriers exist for Hispanic Americans consent to donation, resulting in significantly lower donation rates compared with white individuals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an aggressive outreach intervention during a 5-year period aimed at improving organ donation rates among Hispanic Americans. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective longitudinal observation study of organ donors treated at a major metropolitan level I trauma center. The center provides most of the medical care to the 4 Southern California neighborhoods with a high percentage of Hispanic Americans that were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Television and radio media campaigns and culturally sensitive educational programs implemented at high schools, churches, and medical clinics in the target neighborhoods. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Consent rate for organ donation recorded during the study. RESULTS: Outreach interventions started in 2007 and were completed by 2012. Of 268 potential donors, 155 total donors (106 Hispanic Americans) provided consent during this time. A significant increase in consent rate was noted among Hispanic Americans, from 56% in 2005 to 83%in 2011 (P = .004); this increase was not evident in the population that was not Hispanic (67%in 2005 and 79% in 2011; P = .21). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Aggressive outreach programs can reduce the disparity between organ supply and demand by improving the consent rate among the target group.

Increasing organ donation in Hispanic Americans: the role of media and other community outreach efforts.

IMPORTANCE: The growing demand for organs continues to outpace supply. This gap is most pronounced in minority populations, who constitute more than 40% of the organ waiting list. Hispanic Americans are particularly less likely to donate compared with other minorities for reasons that remain poorly understood and difficult to change. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outreach interventions that target Hispanic Americans improve organ donation outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective before-after study of 4 southern California neighborhoods with a high percentage of Hispanic American residents. We conducted cross-sectional telephone surveys before and 2 years after outreach interventions. Respondents 18 years or older were drawn randomly from lists of Hispanic surnames. Awareness, perceptions, and beliefs regarding organ donation and intent to donate were measured and compared before and after interventions. INTERVENTION: Television and radio commercials about organ donation and educational programs at 5 high schools and 4 Catholic churches. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number of survey participants who specify intent to donate. RESULTS: A total of 402 preintervention and 654 postintervention individuals participated in the surveys. We observed a significant increase in awareness of and knowledge about organ donation and a significant increase in the intent to donate (17.7% vs 12.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.06-2.26; P = .02]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Focused donor outreach programs sustain awareness and knowledge and can significantly improve intent to donate organs in the Hispanic American population. These programs should continue to be evaluated and implemented to influence donor registration.

A focused educational program after religious services to improve organ donation in Hispanic Americans.

Religion is an important determinant in Hispanic Americans (HA) becoming organ donors as HA often believe religion forbids donation. We investigated the effect of an educational program targeting HA organ donation in places of worship. A prospective observational study was conducted at four Catholic churches with a high percentage of HA. A 45-min "culturally sensitive" educational program, conducted in Spanish, was implemented. Organ donation awareness, knowledge, perception, and beliefs, as well as the intent to become an organ donor, were measured before and after the intervention. Differences between before and after the intervention were analyzed. A total of 182 surveys were conducted before and 159 surveys were conducted after the educational program. A significant increase was observed in organ donation knowledge (54% vs. 70%, p<0.0001), perception (43% vs. 58%, p<0.0001), and beliefs (50% vs. 60%, p=0.0001). However, no significant difference was found in the willingness to discuss donation with family, intent-to-donate, or registering to donate after the intervention. This study demonstrates that a focused educational program in places of worship can significantly improve HA knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs regarding organ donation. Further work is needed to understand why intent-to-donate does not increase despite the increase in organ donation awareness.

Impact of compliance with the American College of Surgeons trauma center verification requirements on organ donation-related outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In order to maximize organ donation opportunities, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) requires verified trauma centers to have a relationship with an organ procurement organization (OPO), a policy for notification of the OPO, a process to review organ donation rates, and a protocol for declaring neurologic death. We hypothesized that meeting the ACS requirements will be associated with improved donation outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-four ACS-verified Level I and Level II trauma centers were surveyed for the following registry data points from 2004 to 2008: admissions, ICU admissions, patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Score ≥ 5, deaths, and organ donors. Centers were also queried for the presence of the ACS requirements as well as other process measures and characteristics. The main outcomes measure was the number of organ donors per center normalized for patient volume and injury severity. The relationship between center characteristics and outcomes was determined. RESULTS: Twenty-one centers (88%) completed the survey and referred 2,626 trauma patients to the OPO during the study period, 1,008 were eligible to donate, and 699 became organ donors. Compliance with the 4 ACS requirements was not associated with increased organ donation outcomes. However, having catastrophic brain injury guidelines (CBIGs) and the presence of a trauma surgeon on a donor council were associated with significantly more organ donors per 1,000 trauma admissions (6.3 vs 4.2 and 6.0 vs 4.2, respectively, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the ACS trauma center organ donation-related requirements were not associated with improved organ donor outcomes, involvement of trauma surgeons on donor councils and CBIGs were and should be encouraged. Additionally, incorporation of quantitative organ donation measures into the verification process should be considered.

The effect of trauma center designation on organ donor outcomes in Southern California.

We sought to investigate the effect of trauma center designation on organ donor outcomes during a 5-year period. A retrospective study of the southern California regional Organ Procurement Organization database comparing trauma centers (n = 25) versus nontrauma centers (n = 171) and Level I (n = 7) versus Level II (n = 18) trauma centers between 2004 and 2008 was performed. A total of 16,830 referrals were evaluated and 44 per cent were from trauma centers. When compared with nontrauma centers (n = 171), trauma centers (n = 25) had a higher percentage of medically suitable eligible deaths (29 vs 16%, P < 0.001), total eligible deaths (22 vs 12%, P < 0.001), and eligible donors (14 vs 7%, P < 0.001). Trauma Centers had a significantly higher number of organs procured per donor (4.0 ± 1.6 vs 3.5 ± 1.6, P < 0.001), organs transplanted per donor (OTPD) (3.6 ± 1.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.8, P < 0.001), and higher organ yield (per cent 4 or greater OTPD [48 vs 31%, P < 0.001]). No significant differences were found between Level I and Level II trauma centers. Trauma centers demonstrate significantly better organ donor outcomes compared with nontrauma centers. Factors responsible for improved outcomes at trauma centers should be evaluated, reproduced, and disseminated to nontrauma centers to alleviate the growing organ shortage crisis.

Organ donation and Hispanic american high school students: attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, and intent to donate.

The growing need for transplantable organs continues to outpace supply. This discrepancy is most pronounced in minority populations. Hispanic Americans, however, are significantly less likely to donate their organs for reasons that remain poorly understood. We sought to identify factors that influence Hispanic American high school students' intent to donate organs. A prospective observational study was conducted in five Los Angeles high schools within four separate zip codes known for a high percentage of Hispanic Americans. High school students, ages 15 to 20 years, were surveyed to assess demographic factors, cultural factors, awareness and knowledge, perception, and belief regarding organ donation and the intent to donate. A total of 5444 surveys were collected over a 4-month period. After logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for predicting the intent to donate were: family support, 11th and 12th grade high school students, being female, religion, and the belief that Hispanics are more likely to need an organ transplant. This study represents the largest study to date examining factors associated with the intent to donate in Hispanic American high school students. To address the organ shortage crisis in Hispanic Americans, these risk factors should be considered using specific, effective educational programs.

Utilizing the media to help increase organ donation in the Hispanic American population.

OBJECTIVE: As the shortage of suitable organs for transplantation is especially pronounced among Hispanic Americans (HA), our objective was to determine whether a focused media campaign including culturally sensitive educational material on organ donation would positively influence organ donation awareness, perceptions, and beliefs, and increase the likelihood of organ donation in the HA community. METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted before and after a media campaign in four Southern California neighborhoods with a high percentage of HA. Respondents, age ≥18 yr, were drawn randomly from lists of Hispanic surnames. Awareness, perception, and belief regarding organ donation and intent-to-donate were measured. The differences between the Pre- and Post-media surveys were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 524 Pre-media and 528 Post-media subjects were evaluated. The Post-media surveys demonstrated improvements in: organ donation awareness (43% vs. 31%, p < 0.0001), the belief that donation is a social responsibility (54% vs. 45%, p = 0.008), and the belief that donation helps people (91% vs. 87%, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: A media campaign emphasizing culturally sensitive educational material can significantly influence organ donation awareness and beliefs in HA.

In-house coordinator programs improve conversion rates for organ donation.

BACKGROUND: The organ supply shortage continues to be a public health care crisis, with nearly 20 people dying each day awaiting transplantation. Inability to obtain consent remains one of the major obstacles to converting potential donors into organ donors. We hypothesize that the presence of in-house coordinators (IHCs) from organ procurement organizations (OPOs) will improve organ donor conversion rates. METHODS: This retrospective review analyzed the effect of an IHC program on organ donation outcome. Referrals for possible organ donation from three IHC programs to regional organ procurement organizations were included. Data regarding organ donation demographics and outcomes were compared before (Pre-IHC) and after (Post-IHC) the establishment of an IHC program. The main outcome measures were conversion and family decline rates. The conversion rate was calculated as the number of actual donors divided by the number of eligible deaths and is represented as a percentage. The IHC functioned to assess for potential donors, ensure timely referrals, provide hospital staff education, assist with family consent and donor management, and provide family support. RESULTS: Post-IHC was associated with a significantly lower family decline rate (6% vs. 18%, p < 0.001), a significantly higher consent for research rate (8% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001), and a significantly higher conversion rate (77% vs. 63%, p = 0.007) compared with Pre-IHC. In addition, a significant increase in referrals per day (0.35 vs. 0.27, p < 0.05) and organs transplanted per eligible death were noted Post-IHC. CONCLUSION: The presence of an IHC program significantly improves conversion rates for organ donation as well as organ yield. An IHC program should be considered as a viable option to bridge the gap between organ supply and organ demand.

The impact of race on organ donation rates in Southern California.

BACKGROUND: The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative began in 2003 to address and alleviate the shortage of organs available for transplantation. This study investigated the patterns of organ donation by race to determine if the Collaborative had an impact on donation rates among ethnic minorities. STUDY DESIGN: The following data from the Southern California regional organ procurement organization were reviewed between 2004 and 2008: age, race (Caucasian, African-American, Asian, Hispanic, and other), the numbers of eligible referrals for organ donation and actual donors, types of donors, consent rates, conversion rates, organs procured per donor (OPPD), and organs transplanted per donor (OTPD). Logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of ≥4 OTPD. RESULTS: There were 1,776 actual donors out of 2,760 eligible deaths (conversion rate 64%). Hispanics demonstrated a significantly lower conversion rate than Caucasians (64% vs 77%, p < 0.001), but a considerably higher rate than African Americans (50%) and Asians (51%, p < 0.05 for both). There were no significant changes in conversion rates over time in any race. Age was a negative predictor (odds ratio [OR] 0.95), and trauma mechanism (OR 2.1) and standard criteria donor status (OR 2.5) were positive independent predictors of ≥4 OTPD. Race did not affect OTPD (all groups, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion rates among all ethnic minorities were significantly lower than the rates observed in Caucasians. However, when controlling for other factors, race was not a significant risk factor for the number of organs transplanted per donor. The Collaborative has not had an identifiable effect on race conversion rates during the 5 years since its implementation. Further intervention is necessary to improve the conversion rate in ethnic minorities in Southern California.

The combination of an online organ and tissue registry with a public education campaign can increase the number of organs available for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A persistent shortage of organs and inexhaustible waiting lists continue to result in many people dying while awaiting transplantation. On July 1, 2006, the California Department of Motor Vehicles joined forces with California's Online Organ and Tissue Registry and launched a campaign to increase donation rates. This campaign included intense public and media education. The efficacy of such a campaign on donor demographics has not been studied. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of organ donor referrals and donations from all southern California hospitals covered by a regional organ procurement agency. Organ donor demographics from 2 years before (pretime: 2004-2005) and 2 years after (posttime: 2007-2008) were compared. RESULTS: Pretime included 6,112 referrals, 1,548 potential donors with 696 actual donors. Posttime included 7,119 referrals, 1,409 potential donors, and 699 actual donors. Consent for donation improved to 51.0% from 47.5% (p = 0.064), family decline decreased to 32.6% from 44.1% (p < 0.0001), and conversion rates improved to 49.6% from 45.0% (p = 0.011). Coroners also declined donation less frequently during posttime (1.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.004). Extended criteria donors improved to 9.5% from 3.8% (p < 0.0001), and donor after cardiac death improved to 3.0% from 1.4% (p = 0.002). A decrease in organs per donor was noted (3.57% vs. 3.14%, p < 0.0001) most likely because of the increase in extended criteria donors and donor after cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: Public and media education significantly improved organ donor demographics. Although this study compares only 2 years before with 2 years after the donation campaign, the results are extremely favorable. Therefore, a public donation campaign and an organ donor registry are effective promotions that could help increase the number of organs available for transplantation.

Contributing factors for the willingness to donate organs in the Hispanic American population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that contribute to intent to donate organs in Hispanic American individuals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone surveys. SETTING: Four southern California neighborhoods with a high percentage of Hispanic American individuals. PATIENTS: Respondents 18 years or older were drawn randomly from lists of Hispanic surnames. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Telephone surveys were conducted that measured demographic and socioeconomic factors, cultural factors, awareness and knowledge, and perception and belief regarding organ donation, as well as the intent to become an organ donor. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent contributing factors to intent to register for organ donation. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-four telephone surveys were conducted over a 3-week period. Seventy-three percent of those surveyed were between the ages of 18 and 44 years and the sample was equally divided between men and women. The following independent risk factors contributed to intent to register: low acculturation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.62; P < .001), religion (AOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.60; P < .001), perception that the wealthy are more likely to receive organs (AOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.65; P = .001), belief that donation disfigures the body and impacts the funeral (AOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89; P = .02), and family influence (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.28-3.22; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Among Hispanic American individuals, low acculturation, religion, belief, and family influence affect the intent to register for organ donation. To improve organ donation, these risk factors should be considered using specific, effective educational programs.