Making intussusception reductions easier: use of medical air in lieu of manual pump.

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception is commonly performed with manual insufflators. The challenge of operating a handheld device while controlling the fluoroscope and monitoring the reduction could be obviated if the manual insufflation could be eliminated. OBJECTIVE: The aim in this retrospective study was to describe and evaluate the use of medical wall air in intussusception reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all intussusception reductions over a period of years: from 2015 to 2018 using the manual insufflator and from 2018 to 2021 using medical air. We compared success rates, complication rates and time to reduction as documented on fluoroscopic image time stamps. Demographic data were obtained from the medical record. Attending radiologists and fluoroscopic technologists indicated their preference between methods, ease of use, perceived duration of reduction and perceived difference in success rates through an anonymous internal survey. RESULTS: There were 179 first reduction attempts in 167 patients (93 attempts during the period using the manual insufflator and 86 after converting to wall air). There was no difference in reduction duration (8:23 min for insufflation, 8:22 min for wall air, P=0.99) and no statistically significant difference in success rate (66.8% for insufflation and 79.1% for wall air, P=0.165). All survey respondents preferred the wall air method. The vast majority (93%) perceived that the wall air method was faster. CONCLUSION: Hospital wall air can be used to successfully reduce intussusceptions without incurring time burden or loss of effectiveness. The method leads to a perception of increased efficiency.

Urine leaks in children sustaining blunt renal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Few consensus statements exist to guide the timely diagnosis and management of urine leaks in children sustaining blunt renal trauma (BRT). The aims of this study were to characterize kidney injuries among children who sustain BRT, evaluate risk factors for urine leaks, and describe the negative impact of urinoma on patient outcomes and resource consumption. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 347 patients, younger than 19 years, who presented with BRT to a single American College of Surgeons-verified Level I Pediatric Trauma Center between 2005 and 2020. Frequency of and risk factors for urine leak after BRT were evaluated, and impact on patient outcomes and resource utilization were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 44 (12.7%) patients developed urine leaks, which exclusively presented among injury Grade 3 (n = 5; 11.4%), Grade 4 (n = 27; 61.4%), and Grade 5 (n = 12; 27.3%). A minority of urine leaks (n = 20; 45.5%) were discovered on presenting CT scan but all within 3 days. Kidney-specific operative procedures (nephrectomy, cystoscopy with J/ureteral stent, percutaneous nephrostomy) were more common among urine leak patients (n = 17; 38.6%) compared with patients without urine leaks (n = 3; 1.0%; p = 0.001). Patients with urine leak had more frequent febrile episodes during hospital stay (n = 24; 54.5%; p = 0.001) and showed increased overall 90-day readmission rates (n = 14; 33.3%; p < 0.001). Independent risk factors that associated with urine leak were higher grade (odds ratio [OR], 7.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-24.3; p < 0.001), upper-lateral quadrant injuries (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.1; p = 0.02), and isolated BRT (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.5; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of children sustaining BRT, urine leaks result in considerable morbidity, including more febrile episodes, greater 90-day readmission rates, and increased operative or image-guided procedures. This study is the first to examine the relationship between kidney quadrant injury and urine leaks. Higher grade (Grade 4-5) injury, upper lateral quadrant location, and isolated BRT were independently predictive of urine leaks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Characterization of germinal matrix hemorrhage in extremely premature infants: recognition of posterior location and diagnostic pitfalls.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, descriptions of germinal matrix hemorrhage (GMH), derived from observations in preterm and very preterm infants, indicate its location at the caudothalamic grooves. However, before the germinal matrix begins to recede at approximately 28 weeks' gestational age (GA), it extends along the floor of the lateral ventricles far posterior to the caudothalamic grooves. Germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH-IVH) can occur along any site from which the germinal matrix has not yet involuted. Therefore, as current advances in neonatology have allowed the routine survival of extremely preterm infants as young as 23 weeks' GA, postnatal GMH-IVH can occur in previously undescribed locations. Hemorrhage in the more posterior GMH on head ultrasound, if unrecognized, may lead to errors in diagnosis and mislocalization of this injury to the periventricular white matter or lateral walls of the lateral ventricles instead of to the subependyma, where it is in fact located. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to describe posterior GMH in extremely premature infants, including its characteristic imaging appearance and potential pitfalls in diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period, all consecutive extremely preterm infants of 27 weeks' GA or less who developed GMH-IVH of any grade were included. A consecutive group of 100 very preterm infants of 31 weeks' GA with a GMH-IVH of any grade served as controls. RESULTS: In 106 extremely preterm neonates (mean GA: 25 weeks, range: 23.1-26.6 weeks) with 212 potential lateral ventricular germinal matrix bleeding sites, 159 sites had bleeds. In 70/159 (44%), the GMH-IVH was located posterior to the caudothalamic grooves and the foramina of Monro, 52 (32.7%) were both anterior and posterior and 21 (13.2%) were exclusively anterior. In 16 ventricles with intraventricular hemorrhage, an origin site in the germinal matrix could not be determined. In the control population of very preterm infants, all hemorrhages were at the anterior caudothalamic grooves and 95% were grade I. CONCLUSION: Unlike the older very preterm and moderately preterm infants that form the basis of our GMH-IVH description and classification, the extremely preterm infants now routinely surviving have a more fetal pattern of germinal matrix distribution, which is reflected in a different distribution and size of germinal matrix injury. We report the postnatal occurrence of subependymal GMH-IVH in extremely preterm infants in these more primitive, posterior locations, its potential imaging pitfalls and sonographic findings.

Commentary regarding sedated ultrasound guided saline reduction (SUR) of ileocolic intussusception; 20 year experience.

This is a commentary on the manuscript by Sacks R, Anconina R, Farkas E, et al, titled "Sedated Ultrasound Guided Saline Reduction (SUR) of Ileocolic Intussusception: 20 Year Experience".

O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee.

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US risk stratification and management system is designed to provide consistent interpretations, to decrease or eliminate ambiguity in US reports resulting in a higher probability of accuracy in assigning risk of malignancy to ovarian and other adnexal masses, and to provide a management recommendation for each risk category. It was developed by an international multidisciplinary committee sponsored by the American College of Radiology and applies the standardized reporting tool for US based on the 2018 published lexicon of the O-RADS US working group. For risk stratification, the O-RADS US system recommends six categories (O-RADS 0-5), incorporating the range of normal to high risk of malignancy. This unique system represents a collaboration between the pattern-based approach commonly used in North America and the widely used, European-based, algorithmic-style International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa model system, a risk prediction model that has undergone successful prospective and external validation. The pattern approach relies on a subgroup of the most predictive descriptors in the lexicon based on a retrospective review of evidence prospectively obtained in the IOTA phase 1-3 prospective studies and other supporting studies that assist in differentiating management schemes in a variety of almost certainly benign lesions. With O-RADS US working group consensus, guidelines for management in the different risk categories are proposed. Both systems have been stratified to reach the same risk categories and management strategies regardless of which is initially used. At this time, O-RADS US is the only lexicon and classification system that encompasses all risk categories with their associated management schemes.

Clinical decision support: practical implementation at two pediatric hospitals.

Clinical decision support has been identified by the United States government as a method to decrease inappropriate imaging exams and promote judicious use of imaging resources. The adoption of this method will be incentivized by requiring appropriate use criteria to qualify for Medicare reimbursement starting in January 2020. While Medicare reimbursement is unlikely to directly impact pediatric imaging because of largely disparate patient populations, insurance providers typically use Medicare to benchmark their reimbursement guidelines. Therefore soon after their adoption these guidelines could become relevant to pediatric imaging. In this article we discuss how pediatric imaging was initially underrepresented in the clinical decision support realm, and how this was addressed by a subcommittee involving both American College of Radiology and Society for Pediatric Radiology members. We also present the experience of implementing clinical decision support software at two standalone pediatric hospitals and summarize the lessons learned from these deployments.

Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for Ultrasound: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee.

Ultrasound is the most commonly used imaging technique for the evaluation of ovarian and other adnexal lesions. The interpretation of sonographic findings is variable because of inconsistency in descriptor terminology used among reporting clinicians. The use of vague terms that are inconsistently applied can lead to significant differences in interpretation and subsequent management strategies. A committee was formed under the direction of the ACR initially to create a standardized lexicon for ovarian lesions with the goal of improving the quality and communication of imaging reports between ultrasound examiners and referring clinicians. The ultimate objective will be to apply the lexicon to a risk stratification classification for consistent follow-up and management in clinical practice. This white paper describes the consensus process in the creation of a standardized lexicon for ovarian and adnexal lesions and the resultant lexicon.

Inclusion of Pediatric-Specific Indications and Procedures in the New ACR MRI Accreditation Program.

MRI equipment with its complex instrumentation and adaptable software applications is vulnerable to technical and image quality problems, and maintaining quality assurance is essential. Accreditation of MRI centers by the ACR has become a routine practice for radiology departments and imaging centers across the country. In its prior format, the ACR MRI Accreditation Program had examination anatomic modules designed primarily to measure quality and validate MR performance primarily in adult imaging practices. In an effort to more closely meet the specific imaging requirements of pediatric patients, an ad hoc MR accreditation committee was created under the ACR Commission on Pediatric Imaging. The committee, consisting of ACR members from five children's hospitals, was tasked with creating suggested revisions to the anatomic modules and helping develop pediatric-specific studies that could be adopted into the ACR MRI Accreditation Program. Updated ACR MRI accreditation anatomic modules incorporating the ad hoc committee's recommendations were released by ACR in May 2017. This article highlights the recommendations made by the ad hoc committee. The revised modules should allow pediatric imaging centers to achieve ACR MRI accreditation for all anatomic modules and will underscore best imaging practices for patients of all ages.

Quality measures and pediatric radiology: suggestions for the transition to value-based payment.

Recent political and economic factors have contributed to a meaningful change in the way that quality in health care, and by extension value, are viewed. While quality is often evaluated on the basis of subjective criteria, pay-for-performance programs that link reimbursement to various measures of quality require use of objective and quantifiable measures. This evolution to value-based payment was accelerated by the 2015 passage of the Medicare Access and CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) Reauthorization Act (MACRA). While many of the drivers of these changes are rooted in federal policy and programs such as Medicare and aimed at adult patients, the practice of pediatrics and pediatric radiology will be increasingly impacted. This article addresses issues related to the use of quantitative measures to evaluate the quality of services provided by the pediatric radiology department or sub-specialty section, particularly as seen from the viewpoint of a payer that may be considering ways to link payment to performance. The paper concludes by suggesting a metric categorization strategy to frame future work on the subject.

White Paper on P4 Concepts for Pediatric Imaging.

Over the past decade, innovations in the field of pediatric imaging have been based largely on single-center and retrospective studies, which provided limited advances for the benefit of pediatric patients. To identify opportunities for potential "quantum-leap" progress in the field of pediatric imaging, the ACR-Pediatric Imaging Research (PIR) Committee has identified high-impact research directions related to the P4 concept of predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory diagnosis and intervention. Input from 237 members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology was clustered around 10 priority areas, which are discussed in this article. Needs within each priority area have been analyzed in detail by ACR-PIR experts on these topics. By facilitating work in these priority areas, we hope to revolutionize the care of children by shifting our efforts from unilateral reaction to clinical symptoms, to interactive maintenance of child health.

Patient-specific dose calculations for pediatric CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis.

BACKGROUND: Organ dose is essential for accurate estimates of patient dose from CT. OBJECTIVE: To determine organ doses from a broad range of pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic chest-abdomen-pelvis CT and investigate how these relate to patient size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a previously validated Monte Carlo simulation model of a Philips Brilliance 64 multi-detector CT scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) to calculate organ doses for 40 pediatric patients (M:F = 21:19; range 0.6-17 years). Organ volumes and positions were determined from the images using standard segmentation techniques. Non-linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between volume CT dose index (CTDIvol)-normalized organ doses and abdominopelvic diameter. We then compared results with values obtained from independent studies. RESULTS: We found that CTDIvol-normalized organ dose correlated strongly with exponentially decreasing abdominopelvic diameter (R(2) > 0.8 for most organs). A similar relationship was determined for effective dose when normalized by dose-length product (R(2) = 0.95). Our results agreed with previous studies within 12% using similar scan parameters (e.g., bowtie filter size, beam collimation); however results varied up to 25% when compared to studies using different bowtie filters. CONCLUSION: Our study determined that organ doses can be estimated from measurements of patient size, namely body diameter, and CTDIvol prior to CT examination. This information provides an improved method for patient dose estimation.

Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to identify whether a substantive difference exists between the imaging interpretations of radiologists at outside referring institutions and those of radiologists at a tertiary care children's hospital and whether such reinterpretation affects the clinical management of pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective chart review examined the diagnostic imaging reports of all pediatric patients referred to a tertiary care freestanding children's hospital over a 17-month period (January 1, 2009-May 31, 2010); 773 examinations met the inclusion criteria. The original and second interpretations were compared. A fellowship-trained pediatric radiologist and neuroradiologist categorized each case using the content of the two radiology reports as agreement versus minor or major disagreement, and the results were analyzed for statistical significance. A cohort of cases in which a final diagnosis could be confirmed was also analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of both interpretations. RESULTS: Disagreements were found in 323 of 773 reports (41.8%): 168 (21.7%) were major and 155 (20.0%), minor. Neurologic studies were most frequently requested for reinterpretation, 427 (55.2%), most commonly in the setting of trauma, 286 (67.0%). Among the 427 neuroimaging studies, major and minor disagreements occurred in 54 (12.6%) and 91 (21.3%) cases, respectively. Major disagreements most frequently observed were about the presence of fracture and hemorrhage. Among 305 body imaging cases, major and minor disagreements occurred in 99 (32.6%) and 57 (18.7%) cases, respectively. The most common setting for nontraumatic body imaging was concern for appendicitis (168/305 [55.1%]); this indication for imaging was responsible for 40.3% of major disagreements in nontraumatic abdominal imaging. Reinterpretation was rarely requested for radiographic studies (41/773 [5.3%]), which had major and minor disagreement rates of 36.6% and 17.1%, respectively. In the cohort of cases analyzed for final diagnosis, the second interpretation was more accurate than the original in 90.2% of cases with a p value of less than 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that discrepancy rates for second interpretations in studies of pediatric patients transferred to tertiary care pediatric institutions are substantial. Although the original and second interpretations in the majority of cases were in agreement, major discrepancies were prevalent--12.6% and 32.6% of neuroimaging and body studies, respectively--and the second interpretations were significantly correlated with the final diagnosis. These results indicate that interpretations by subspecialty radiologists at a point-of-care facility provide important clinical information about the pediatric patient and should be recognized by payers as integral to optimal care.