Primary anastomosis as a valid alternative for extremely low birth weight infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation.

The aim was to assess the results of primary anastomosis (PA) compared to enterostomy (ES) in infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and a weight below 1000 g. Between 2014 and 2016, enterostomy was routinely carried out on extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients with SIP. From 2016 until 2019, all patients underwent anastomosis without stoma formation. We compared outcome and complications in both groups. Forty-two patients with a median gestational age of 24.3 weeks and a birth weight of 640 g with SIP were included. Thirty patients underwent PA; ES was performed in 12 patients. Overall in-hospital mortality was 11.9% (PA: 13.3%, ES: 8.3%). Reoperations due to complications became necessary in 10/30 patients with PA and 4/12 patients with ES. Length of stay was 110.5 days in the PA group and 124 days in the ES group. Median weight at discharge was higher in the PA group (PA: 2258 g, ES: 1880 g, p = .036).Conclusion: Primary anastomosis is a feasible treatment option for SIP in infants < 1000 g and may have a positive impact on weight gain and length of hospitalization. However, further studies on selection criteria for PA are necessary. What is Known: • Enterostomy (ES) and primary anastomosis (PA) are feasible treatment options in preterm infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). • Stomal complications or failure to thrive due to poor food utilization can pose significant problems. What is New: • Primary anastomosis in case of SIP is equal to enterostomy in terms of mortality and revision rate; however, length of stay and weight gain can be presumably positively influenced. • Primary anastomosis is a valid treatment option even for patients weighing less than 1000 g.

[Flap Reconstruction as Alternative Anastomosis Technique for the Surgery of Oesophageal Atresia with Distal Oesophagotracheal Fistula]. / Die Lappenplastik als alternative Anastomosentechnik für die operative Korrektur der Ösophagusatresie mit distaler ösophagotrachealer Fistel.

AIM: The creation of a primary anastomosis in newborns with oesophageal atresia and distal oesophageotracheal fistula (EA-DF) is technically challenging, especially in small children. The goal is to approximate the fragile oesophageal ends without suture disruption and to minimize the mobilisation of the lower segment. We describe an alternative anastomosis technique aiming at reducing the tension on the first sutures at the posterior wall. INDICATIONS: EA-DF was corrected in 13 newborns either by open (n = 11) or thoracoscopic (n = 2) surgery using this technique. METHOD: The anastomosis technique is based on creation of a dorsal flap of the upper oesophageal pouch and insertion in the spatulated lower oesophageal segment after the fistula has been separated. Subsequently, the first sutures of the posterior wall can be accomplished with reduced tension. Upon completion of the anastomosis, a diagonally shaped anastomotic plane results. CONCLUSION: The method is a helpful alternative to approximate the oesophageal stumps of newborns with EA and distal oesophagotracheal fistula. By this technique, the first stabilising sutures of the posterior wall can be accomplished with reduced tension. This results in reduced tensile stress on the individual sutures and simplifies the anastomisation in comparison to the conventional end-to-end anastomosis.

Peritoneal drainage in pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight infants.

The aim was to determine if peritoneal drainage (PD) is a suitable treatment for pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. A retrospective chart review of 42 ELBW infants with pneumoperitoneum at the University Hospital of Cologne between November 2014 and April 2017 was performed. Forty-two infants with a median birth weight of 645 g (interquartile range (IQR) 550, 806) and a median gestational age of 24.3 weeks (IQR 23.2, 25.6) were treated for pneumoperitoneum. Twenty-six (62%) received PD, and in ten (38%), the drain could be removed without further intervention. Infants in the PD group were of significantly lower birth weight (622g vs. 750 g), age (4.5 vs. 10.0 days), and weight at diagnosis (538 vs. 778 g). The mortality in the PD group was 15% at 90 days of life, but no patient deceased in the primary laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: We suggest PD with close evaluation of drainage and clinical course as an alternative treatment for pneumoperitoneum in ELBW infants allowing bridging the vulnerable first days of life until these infants are in a more stable condition. Despite not reaching statistical significance in our series, PD showed the trend towards higher mortality. What is known: • Pneumoperitoneum is traditionally treated with laparotomy, but placement of peritoneal drainage (PD) is a valuable treatment option. • Previous randomized controlled trials have shown no significant differences in mortality for PD versus laparotomy. What is new: • In our cohort, 38% of the infants with PD could be saved from secondary laparotomy, but in the PD group there was a trend towards higher mortality. • PD allows bridging the vulnerable first days of life until ELBW infants are in a more stable condition for possible laparotomy.