DNA methylation-based age acceleration observed in IDH wild-type glioblastoma is associated with better outcome-including in elderly patients.

Elderly patients represent a growing proportion of individuals with glioblastoma, who however, are often excluded from clinical trials owing to poor expected prognosis. We aimed at identifying age-related molecular differences that would justify and guide distinct treatment decisions in elderly glioblastoma patients. The combined DNA methylome (450 k) of four IDH wild-type glioblastoma datasets, comprising two clinical trial cohorts, was interrogated for differences based on the patients' age, DNA methylation (DNAm) age acceleration (DNAm age "Horvath-clock" minus patient age), DNA methylation-based tumor classification (Heidelberg), entropy, and functional methylation of DNA damage response (DDR) genes. Age dependent methylation included 19 CpGs (p-value ≤ 0.1, Bonferroni corrected), comprising a CpG located in the ELOVL2 gene that is part of a 13-gene forensic age predictor. Most of the age related CpGs (n = 16) were also associated with age acceleration that itself was associated with a large number of CpGs (n = 50,551). Over 70% age acceleration-associated CpGs (n = 36,348) overlapped with those associated with the DNA methylation based tumor classification (n = 170,759). Gene set enrichment analysis identified associated pathways, providing insights into the biology of DNAm age acceleration and respective commonalities with glioblastoma classification. Functional methylation of several DDR genes, defined as correlation of methylation with gene expression (r ≤ -0.3), was associated with age acceleration (n = 8), tumor classification (n = 12), or both (n = 4), the latter including MGMT. DNAm age acceleration was significantly associated with better outcome in both clinical trial cohorts, whereof one comprised only elderly patients. Multivariate analysis included treatment (RT, RT/TMZ→TMZ; TMZ, RT), MGMT promoter methylation status, and interaction with treatment. In conclusion, DNA methylation features of age acceleration are an integrative part of the methylation-based tumor classification (RTK I, RTK II, MES), while patient age seems hardly reflected in the glioblastoma DNA methylome. We found no molecular evidence justifying other treatments in elderly patients, not owing to frailty or co-morbidities.

Treatment and survival of glioblastoma patients in Denmark: The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry 2009-2014.

BACKGROUND: As many glioblastoma patients are in a poor condition they are unable to undergo the full treatment documented in clinical trials. We aimed to examine the survival and its relationship to clinical characteristics and treatment in a nationwide population of glioblastoma patients in Denmark. METHODS: We included prospectively recorded clinical data from 1364 adult patients with histologically verified glioblastoma from the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry, 2009-2014. RESULTS: The age standardized incidence rate was 6.3/100,000 person-years for males and 3.9 for females and the median age was 66 years. The median overall survival was 11.2 months. There was an independently significant prognostic effect of age, performance status, cognitive symptoms, tumor diameter, multifocality, crossing midline, and contrast enhancement. For partial and total resection compared to biopsy only, the adjusted risk of dying was reduced by 43% (HR [CI] 0.57 [0.48-0.68]) and 51% (0.49 [0.40-0.60]), respectively. For patients receiving a partial and full radiochemotherapy regimen compared to no postsurgical treatment, the risk reduction was 56% (HR [CI] 0.44 [0.37-0.53]) and 70% (0.30 [0.25-0.35]), respectively. The full radiochemotherapy regimen was only allocated to 50% of the patients, 29% among the oldest (70+ years) and 60% among the younger (18-69 years). CONCLUSIONS: Glioblastoma patients had a poor overall survival but with several specific independent prognostic factors. Extensive cancer treatment was associated with an increasing survival in all age groups, but only half of the patients were sufficiently fit for a full regimen of postoperative combined radiochemotherapy.

Epidemiology of glioma: clinical characteristics, symptoms, and predictors of glioma patients grade I-IV in the the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry.

In this national population-based study of glioma, we present epidemiologic data on incidence, demographics, survival, clinical characteristics and symptoms, and evaluate the association of specific indicators with the grade of glioma. We included 1930 patients registered in the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry (DNOR) from 2009 to 2014. DNOR is a large-scale national population-based database including all adult glioma patients in Denmark. The age-adjusted annual incidence of histologic verified glioma was 7.3 cases pr. 100,000 person-years. High-grade gliomas were present in 85% and low-grade glioma in 15%. The overall male:female ratio was 3:2 and the mean age at onset was 60 years. Data for WHO grade I, II, III and IV glioma showed several important differences regarding age and sex distribution and symptomatology at presentation. The mean age increased with the grade of glioma and males predominated in all grades. Focal deficits were the most frequent presenting symptom, but among patients with glioma, grade II epileptic seizures were the most frequent symptom. Headache was a rare mono-symptomatic onset symptom. At presentation, higher age, focal deficits and cognitive change for <3 months duration, and headache <1 month were significant independent indicators of high-grade gliomas. Younger age and epileptic seizures for more than 3 months were indicative for low-grade gliomas. Survival rates for glioma grade I-IV showed decreasing survival with increasing grade. Glioma grade I-IV showed high diversity regarding several demographic and clinical characteristics emphasizing the importance of individually tailored disease treatments and support.

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and irinotecan versus bevacizumab and temozolomide followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: A randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery followed by radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is standard therapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Bevacizumab combined with irinotecan produces impressive response rates in recurrent GBM. In a randomized phase II study, we investigated the efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab combined with irinotecan (Bev-Iri) versus bevacizumab combined with temozolomide (Bev-Tem) before, during and after radiotherapy in newly diagnosed GBM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After surgery, patients were randomized to Bev-Iri or Bev-Tem for eight weeks, followed by standard radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) and concomitant Bev-Iri or Bev-Tem followed by adjuvant Bev-Iri or Bev-Tem for another eight weeks. Bev-Iri: Bevacizumab and irinotecan were given every 14 days before, during and after radiotherapy. Bev-Tem: Bevacizumab was given as in Bev-Iri and temozolomide was given for five days every four weeks before and after radiotherapy and once daily during radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a pre-specified response rate of 30% or more was considered of interest for future studies. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (95% CI 17-51%) for Bev-Tem (n = 32) and 23% (95% CI 9-44%) for Bev-Iri (n = 31) (p = 0.56). Median PFS was 7.7 and 7.3 months for Bev-Tem and Bev-Iri, respectively. Hematological toxicity was more frequent with Bev-Tem including one death from febrile neutropenia whereas non-hematological toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Only the Bev-Tem arm met the pre-specified level of activity of interest. Our results did not indicate any benefit from Bev-Iri in first-line therapy as opposed to Bev-Tem in terms of response and PFS.

Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with glioblastoma are older than 60 years, but treatment guidelines are based on trials in patients aged only up to 70 years. We did a randomised trial to assess the optimum palliative treatment in patients aged 60 years and older with glioblastoma. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were recruited from Austria, Denmark, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey. They were assigned by a computer-generated randomisation schedule, stratified by centre, to receive temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 of every 28 days for up to six cycles), hypofractionated radiotherapy (34·0 Gy administered in 3·4 Gy fractions over 2 weeks), or standard radiotherapy (60·0 Gy administered in 2·0 Gy fractions over 6 weeks). Patients and study staff were aware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN81470623. FINDINGS: 342 patients were enrolled, of whom 291 were randomised across three treatment groups (temozolomide n=93, hypofractionated radiotherapy n=98, standard radiotherapy n=100) and 51 of whom were randomised across only two groups (temozolomide n=26, hypofractionated radiotherapy n=25). In the three-group randomisation, in comparison with standard radiotherapy, median overall survival was significantly longer with temozolomide (8·3 months [95% CI 7·1-9·5; n=93] vs 6·0 months [95% CI 5·1-6·8; n=100], hazard ratio [HR] 0·70; 95% CI 0·52-0·93, p=0·01), but not with hypofractionated radiotherapy (7·5 months [6·5-8·6; n=98], HR 0·85 [0·64-1·12], p=0·24). For all patients who received temozolomide or hypofractionated radiotherapy (n=242) overall survival was similar (8·4 months [7·3-9·4; n=119] vs 7·4 months [6·4-8·4; n=123]; HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·06; p=0·12). For age older than 70 years, survival was better with temozolomide and with hypofractionated radiotherapy than with standard radiotherapy (HR for temozolomide vs standard radiotherapy 0·35 [0·21-0·56], p<0·0001; HR for hypofractionated vs standard radiotherapy 0·59 [95% CI 0·37-0·93], p=0·02). Patients treated with temozolomide who had tumour MGMT promoter methylation had significantly longer survival than those without MGMT promoter methylation (9·7 months [95% CI 8·0-11·4] vs 6·8 months [5·9-7·7]; HR 0·56 [95% CI 0·34-0·93], p=0·02), but no difference was noted between those with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter treated with radiotherapy (HR 0·97 [95% CI 0·69-1·38]; p=0·81). As expected, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the temozolomide group were neutropenia (n=12) and thrombocytopenia (n=18). Grade 3-5 infections in all randomisation groups were reported in 18 patients. Two patients had fatal infections (one in the temozolomide group and one in the standard radiotherapy group) and one in the temozolomide group with grade 2 thrombocytopenia died from complications after surgery for a gastrointestinal bleed. INTERPRETATION: Standard radiotherapy was associated with poor outcomes, especially in patients older than 70 years. Both temozolomide and hypofractionated radiotherapy should be considered as standard treatment options in elderly patients with glioblastoma. MGMT promoter methylation status might be a useful predictive marker for benefit from temozolomide. FUNDING: Merck, Lion's Cancer Research Foundation, University of Umeå, and the Swedish Cancer Society.

A phase II trial with bevacizumab and irinotecan for patients with primary brain tumors and progression after standard therapy.

UNLABELLED: The combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab has shown efficacy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). A prospective, phase II study of 85 patients with various recurrent brain tumors was carried out. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and response rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent primary brain tumors with performance status 0-2 were eligible. Intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg and irinotecan 125/340 mg/m(2) were administered every 14 days. Evaluation was carried out every eight weeks using MRI and Macdonald response criteria. Treatment was continued until progression. RESULTS: In total 85 patients were included with the following histologies: GBM (n = 32), glioma WHO gr. III (n = 33), glioma WHO gr. II (n = 12) and others (n = 8). Patients received a median of four cycles. ORR (overall response rate) for glioblastoma was 25% and 59% achieved stable disease (SD). Median PFS was 5.2 months. For grade III gliomas ORR was 21% and 45% had SD. Median PFS was 3.7 months. No objective responses occurred in grade II gliomas. In the non-glioma population, one PR as well as several long PFS times were observed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan is well tolerated and moderately efficacious in glioblastoma and glioma WHO gr. III. A majority of patients achieve at least disease stabilization. Prolonged progression-free survival in non-glioma patients warrants further research.

A novel DNAseq program for enhanced analysis of Illumina GAII data: a case study on antibody complementarity-determining regions.

High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies are increasingly becoming powerful systems for the comprehensive analysis of variations in whole genomes or various DNA libraries. As they are capable of producing massive collections of short sequences with varying lengths, a major challenge is how to turn these reads into biologically meaningful information. The first stage is to assemble the short reads into longer sequences through an in silico process. However, currently available software/programs allow only the assembly of abundant sequences, which apparently results in the loss of highly variable (or rare) sequences or creates artefact assemblies. In this paper, we describe a novel program (DNAseq) that is capable of assembling highly variable sequences and displaying them directly for phylogenetic analysis. In addition, this program is Microsoft Windows-based and runs by a normal PC with 700MB RAM for a general use. We have applied it to analyse a human naive single-chain antibody (scFv) library, comprehensively revealing the diversity of antibody variable complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) and their families. Although only a scFv library was exemplified here, we envisage that this program could be applicable to other genome libraries.

Optic gliomas: a retrospective analysis of 50 cases.

PURPOSE: Gliomas of the optic pathways are rare childhood central nervous system tumors. The treatment approach is controversial because of its rarity and the slow and unpredictable growth rates of these lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed 50 patients with the diagnosis of optic pathway low-grade gliomas treated between January 1980 and December 1995 at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia. Thirty-five patients presented with chiasmatic/hypothalamic (posterior tumors), and 15 with optic nerve gliomas with or without chiasmal involvement (anterior tumors). Evidence of neurofibromatosis was present in 18 patients. Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery (total or partial resection), and 12 of these received postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Sixteen patients were treated with primary RT. The radiation dose varied between 42 and 54 Gy (median dose 50). RESULTS: The overall actuarial survival rate was 87.5% at 5 years and 75% at 10 years, and the corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 69% and 62%. Patients with anterior tumors fared better than those with posterior tumors, with a 10-year PFS rate of 72% and 58%, respectively; the difference, however, was not statistically significant (p = 0.58). A PFS advantage was found in favor of patients with posterior tumors treated with RT (primary or postoperative) compared with no RT, with 5-year PFS rates of 68% vs. 42% (p = 0.03). This, however, did not translate into a survival advantage because of the success of salvage treatment. CONCLUSION: In multivariate analysis, age (<3 vs. >3 years) emerged as the only significant determinant for PFS with patients <3 years old faring worse (p = 0.03). Neurologic and endocrine dysfunction are significant problems that need to be addressed.

Localised Ewing sarcoma/PNET of bone--prognostic factors and international data comparison.

BACKGROUND: To determine if the distribution of prognostic factors accounted for the differences when the outcome for localised Ewing Sarcoma/PNET bone in Saudi Arabia was compared with results from countries with well developed health care systems. PROCEDURE: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of 163 consecutive patients of all ages, treated with radical intent at KFSHRC from 1975 to 1998. Standard chemotherapy was commenced in all patients. The local treatment modality was resection +/- radiation in 30% and radiation treatment alone in 67%. Size data were available for 51 patients treated from 1994 to 1998, inclusive. One third of these patients had tumors with volume >500 ml. RESULTS: Three year survival significantly increased with the year of diagnosis, 1975-1988 45%; 1989-1993 55%; and 1993-1998 63% (P = 0.006). Favorable prognostic factors were age < or =14 (P = 0.07); site, distal extremity, and skull (P = 0.08); and volume < or = 200 ml (P = 0.06). Secondary prognostic factors were response to induction chemotherapy, both histological, 100% necrosis, (P = 0.04) and clinical CR+PR, (P = 0.02). From 1994 to 1998, 3 year survival for tumors in the distal extremity and skull was 80% and for small tumors, < 200 ml, at any site was 82%. In comparison, the 3 year survival for patients with tumors at any other sites was 60%, and for tumors >200 ml, 55%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival progressively improved. From 1994 to 1998 the survival of patients with small tumors and/or favorable sites was similar to the best reported results. It was not possible to compare results by tumor size for large tumors, > 500 ml, due to the absence of data from elsewhere. A better staging system is required for the international comparison of results.

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a retrospective study of 109 cases.

The purpose of this report is to assess the prognostic factors that could influence management and clinical outcome of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of soft tissues. Between 1975 and 1998, 109 patients diagnosed with MFH of the soft tissues, seen at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, have been reviewed. Of the 109 patients, 75 were men and 34 were women. The median age at presentation was 48 years (range: 3-94). Seven patients (6%) had regional nodal disease and 10 other patients (9%) with distant metastases were excluded from survival analysis. The remaining 92 patients had localized disease and had surgery as the primary treatment modality with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Extremities were the most common location (58%). Tumors less than 5 cm represented 32%, whereas 68% had tumors 5 cm or more. Low-grade tumors constituted 46%, and the remaining 54% were high grade. Thirty-seven percent of patients had positive surgical margins histologically after complete gross resection. The 5- and 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 39% and 36%, respectively. Isolated local recurrence occurred in 20 patients (22%), isolated metastatic disease without local recurrence in 9 patients (10%), and combined local and metastatic disease occurred in 20 patients (22%). The overall 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 50% and 43%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor size and radiation dose were significant factors for RFS (p = 0.04 and 0.0005, respectively). In terms of OS, size, histologic grade, and surgical margins were significant factors on multivariate analysis (p = 0.001. 0.006, and 0.0001, respectively). Complete surgical resection at the time of primary tumor presentation is likely to afford the best chance for RFS and OS. Radiation therapy plays an important role, in combination with surgery for better local control, particularly in high-grade lesions, and in cases with positive surgical margins after wide complete gross excision. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains investigational.