ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/43960.].
ABSTRACT
Neonatal drug information (DI) is essential for safe and effective pharmacotherapy in (pre)term neonates. Such information is usually absent from drug labels, making formularies a crucial part of the neonatal clinician's toolbox. Several formularies exist worldwide, but they have never been fully mapped or compared for content, structure and workflow. The objective of this review was to identify neonatal formularies, explore (dis)similarities, and raise awareness of their existence. Neonatal formularies were identified through self-acquaintance, experts and structured search. A questionnaire was sent to all identified formularies to provide details on formulary function. An original extraction tool was employed to collect DI from the formularies on the 10 most commonly used drugs in pre(term) neonates. Eight different neonatal formularies were identified worldwide (Europe, USA, Australia-New Zealand, Middle East). Six responded to the questionnaire and were compared for structure and content. Each formulary has its own workflow, monograph template and style, and update routine. Focus on certain aspects of DI also varies, as well as the type of initiative and funding. Clinicians should be aware of the various formularies available and their differences in characteristics and content to use them properly for the benefit of their patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based point-of-care information (POCI) tools can facilitate patient safety and care by helping clinicians to answer disease state and drug information questions in less time and with less effort. However, these tools may also be visually challenging to navigate or lack the comprehensiveness needed to sufficiently address a medical issue. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to collect clinicians' feedback and directly observe their use of the combined POCI tool DynaMed and Micromedex with Watson, now known as DynaMedex. EBSCO partnered with IBM Watson Health, now known as Merative, to develop the combined tool as a resource for clinicians. We aimed to identify areas for refinement based on participant feedback and examine participant perceptions to inform further development. METHODS: Participants (N=43) within varying clinical roles and specialties were recruited from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, United States, between August 10, 2021, and December 16, 2021, to take part in usability sessions aimed at evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of, as well as satisfaction with, the DynaMed and Micromedex with Watson tool. Usability testing methods, including think aloud and observations of user behavior, were used to identify challenges regarding the combined tool. Data collection included measurements of time on task; task ease; satisfaction with the answer; posttest feedback on likes, dislikes, and perceived reliability of the tool; and interest in recommending the tool to a colleague. RESULTS: On a 7-point Likert scale, pharmacists rated ease (mean 5.98, SD 1.38) and satisfaction (mean 6.31, SD 1.34) with the combined POCI tool higher than the physicians, nurse practitioner, and physician's assistants (ease: mean 5.57, SD 1.64, and satisfaction: mean 5.82, SD 1.60). Pharmacists spent longer (mean 2 minutes, 26 seconds, SD 1 minute, 41 seconds) on average finding an answer to their question than the physicians, nurse practitioner, and physician's assistants (mean 1 minute, 40 seconds, SD 1 minute, 23 seconds). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the tool performed well, but this usability evaluation identified multiple opportunities for improvement that would help inexperienced users.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Student pharmacists have historically served in shadowing roles for their experiential training at our institution. However, engaging students through active learning assignments has the potential to benefit both the student and the institution. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of student pharmacists on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores, a direct reflection of patient satisfaction within the hospital. METHODS: In a four-month quality-improvement pilot project, student pharmacists were given active learning assignments directed at helping patients understand the purpose and side effects of their medications. Patients with hospital-initiated medications were provided with medication cards via student pharmacist-run counseling programs. The primary outcome was top response ("always") in medication-related HCAHPS scores. Secondary outcomes included scores on individual questions, number of medication education encounters, number of interventions, cost savings, and student feedback. RESULTS: There were 482 medication education encounters. The top response for all medication-related HCAHPS scores improved by 14% (49% to 63%). Top response regarding medication indication increased 23% (63% to 86%). There were 552 interventions accepted, projecting a savings of $135,658. The top score on student evaluations of the practice site increased 20% (69% to 89%). CONCLUSIONS: Student pharmacists can have a meaningful impact on medication-related HCAHPS scores. Additionally, student pharmacists benefit from active learning opportunities by providing and improving patient care leading to a more meaningful experience.
