Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act: Impact on Health Care, Nursing, Quality, and Safety.

Nurse knowledge and expertise in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) are a prerequisite to meet emergency department practice laws and regulatory standards. EMTALA is a federal law that requires anyone coming to an emergency department for care to be stabilized and treated, regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay. Regulatory standard infractions resulting from an EMTALA violation complaint may include (1) penalties and/or fines, (2) future unannounced Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services surveys, (3) documented Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services deficiencies that require timely response, action plans, and audit for expected outcomes, (4) Medicare/Medicaid nonpayment for services, and (5) termination of a hospital's Medicare agreement. The consequences of EMTALA violations target physicians and hospitals; however, nurses are most often the first provider the patient encounters upon arrival to the emergency department. It is therefore essential that nurses maintain a proficient understanding of EMTALA laws, which requires special training, monitoring, periodic competency assessment strategies, and continuing education throughout their career. Furthermore, additional clinician education is needed on how to manage the complex expectations that are imposed on health care providers by regulatory policy. Doing this promotes safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, and efficient health care regulations from the beginning of one's introduction to the health care industry and throughout his or her career. This article seeks to ( a ) emphasize nursing staff's responsibility for EMTALA adherence, ( b ) identify the gaps among health care quality, safety, and nursing workforce competency standards that are imposed to meet the demands of EMTALA laws, and ( c ) provide recommendations for continuing education, monitoring, and periodic competency assessment strategies that may strengthen EMTALA compliance.

Leaving Without Being Seen From the Pediatric Emergency Department: A New Baseline.

BACKGROUND: Left without being seen (LWBS) rates are an important quality metric for pediatric emergency departments (EDs), with high-acuity LWBS children representing a patient safety risk. Since July 2021, our ED experienced a surge in LWBS after the most stringent COVID-19 quarantine restrictions ended. OBJECTIVE: We assessed changes in LWBS rates and examined associations of system factors and patient characteristics with LWBS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in a large, urban pediatric ED for all arriving patients, comparing the following three time-periods: before COVID-19 (PRE, January 2018-February 2020), during early COVID-19 (COVID, March 2020-June 2021), and after the emergence of COVID-19 variants and re-emergence of seasonal viruses (POST, July 2021-December 2021). We compared descriptive statistics of daily LWBS rates, patient demographic characteristics, and system characteristics. Negative binomial (system factors) and logistic regression (patient characteristics) models were developed to evaluate the associations between system factors and LWBS, and patient characteristics and LWBS, respectively. RESULTS: Mean daily LWBS rates changed from 1.8% PRE to 1.4% COVID to 10.7% during POST. Rates increased across every patient demographic and triage level during POST, despite a decrease in daily ED volume compared with PRE. LWBS rates were significantly associated with patients with an Emergency Severity Index score of 2, mean ED census, and staff productivity within multiple periods. Patient characteristics associated with LWBS included lower assigned triage levels and arrival between 8 pm and 4 am. CONCLUSIONS: LWBS rates have shown a large and sustained increase since July 2021, even for high-acuity patients. We identified system factors that may provide opportunities to reduce LWBS. Further work should develop strategies to prevent LWBS in at-risk patients.

Emergency care for youth who experience suicidality and identify as LGBTQ.

INTRODUCTION: Suicide is a leading cause of death in children; youth who identify as LGBTQ+ are at an exponentially higher risk of suicide. The purpose of this study was to explore the lived experiences of youth who identify as LGBTQ+ and sought emergency care for suicidality as adolescents. METHODS: Hermeneutics phenomenology is the research method used in this study. Youth who identify as LGBTQ+ and sought emergency treatment for suicidality when they were adolescents were recruited; fifteen youth enrolled. Individuals ranged in age from 20 to 25 years. Participants described their gender identity as male, female, non-binary, transgender female, and their sexual orientation as: female, demisexual, bisexual, gay, homosexual, lesbian, queer, asexual, and transgender. RESULTS: This study establishes that youth who identify as LGBTQ+ seeking emergency care for suicidality value: coping and control, acceptance from others and self, communicating with me about me, and moving beyond danger and distress. Lack of psychological safety-from the emic perspective-emerged as a critical finding. CONCLUSION: This research has strong implications for public health, policy, and research. Future research must seek to understand ways in which psychological safety is assessed in healthcare if we are to more deeply understand and effectively address the impact on health equity.

The intersection between youth who identify as LGBTQ+ and emergency care for suicidality: an integrative review.

PROBLEM: Suicide is a leading cause of death in children. Sexual minority youth are greater than three times more likely to attempt suicide than their cisgender heterosexual peers. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Empirical and theoretical literature were evaluated through the integrative review process using the Whittemore-Knafl integrative review model (2005). Studies were included when they addressed LGBTQ+ youth seeking emergency care for suicidality. SAMPLE: The final sample included a mix of 13 qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies published in peer-review journals between 2011 and 2020. These articles were located in journals found through a database search, including Medline EBSCO, Health Source/Nursing Academic Education, SportDiscus, ERIC EBSCO, Academic Search Elite, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, APA Psych Info, Embase, and CINAHL. RESULTS: Thirteen studies included individuals 5 to 26 years of age; ten studies included individuals > 11 years old. The analysis and synthesis of coded and grouped data resulted in four themes: 1) affirmation/acceptance, 2) strength, 3) approach/intervention, and 4) safety/psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Research study methods, design, setting, and quality varied. This integrative review has established that youth who identify as LGBTQ+ and are seeking emergency care for suicidality, value: acceptance, safety, strength, and approach/intervention. IMPLICATIONS: There are strong implications for research, healthcare policy, and pediatric nursing practice. Future research is needed to explore the unique values, beliefs, and experiences of youth who identify as LGBTQ+ seeking emergency/crisis care for suicidality.

Improving Youth Suicide Risk Screening and Assessment in a Pediatric Hospital Setting by Using The Joint Commission Guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: Hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission (TJC) are now required to use a validated screening tool and a standardized method for assessment of suicide risk in all behavioral health patients. Our aims for this study were (1) to implement a TJC-compliant process of suicide risk screening and assessment in the pediatric emergency department (ED) and outpatient behavioral health clinic in a large tertiary care children's hospital, (2) to describe characteristics of this population related to suicide risk, and (3) to report the impact of this new process on ED length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A workflow using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale was developed and implemented. Monthly reviews of compliance with screening and assessment were conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to define the study population, and multivariable regression was used to model factors associated with high suicide risk and discharge from the ED. ED LOS of behavioral health patients was compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: Average compliance rates for screening was 83% in the ED and 65% in the outpatient clinics. Compliance with standardized assessments in the ED went from 0% before implementation to 88% after implementation. The analysis revealed that 72% of behavioral health patients in the ED and 18% of patients in behavioral health outpatient clinics had a positive suicide risk. ED LOS did not increase. The majority of patients screening at risk was discharged from the hospital after assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A TJC-compliant process for suicide risk screening and assessment was implemented in the ED and outpatient behavioral health clinic for behavioral health patients without increasing ED LOS.

Improving Throughput for Mid-acuity Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

PURPOSE: Visits to pediatric emergency departments (EDs) are increasing, leading to overcrowding, prolonged patient wait times, and negative patient experiences. In our system, these prolonged wait times and negative experiences notably impact mid-acuity patients. As such, we sought to decrease their time-to-first-provider from 92 to 60 minutes. METHODS: After identifying inefficiencies in patient arrival, triage, and assessment, we redesigned our physical space and implemented a new triage process. Further, we deployed a new multidisciplinary front-end team consisting of a physician, nurses, and ED tech specialists to create and implement an initial management plan. Time-to-first-provider for mid-acuity patients was the main outcome measure. We examined ED length of stay (LOS) as a balancing measure. Post hoc, we measured time-to-first-nursing assessment and the proportion of high-acuity patients seen within 20 minutes as additional measures of the impact of these interventions on our system. All analyses were measured using statistical process control charts. RESULTS: During high patient volumes, we decreased the time-to-first-provider to 70 minutes, but exceeded our goal during low patient volumes (41 minutes). We observed a 5% decrease in LOS during both high and low patient volumes (5% and 8%, respectively). There was a 60% increase in the time-to-first-nursing assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A new front-end process resulted in improved time-to-first-provider and LOS. The new process was associated with longer times for nursing assessments but did not negatively impact the rapid physician assessment of higher acuity patients.

Improving Low-acuity Patient Flow in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A System Redesign.

BACKGROUND: Children's National Health Systems pediatric emergency department (ED), is a level 1 trauma center in Washington, DC, which treats over 90 000 patients annually. Approximately 50% of arriving patients are triaged as low acuity, Emergency Severity Index level 4 or 5. With limited space and resources, these patients are treated inefficiently, with average delays from arrival to provider time of 1.3 hours and length of stays (LOS) close to 2.5 hours. OBJECTIVES: In July 2016, Children's National Health Systems ED initiated a focused approach to improve both patient flow and experience for these low-acuity patients. METHODS: We assembled a multidisciplinary ED-based task force. The quality improvement initiative began in January 2017 and consisted of 4 steps: (1) front-end space redesign; (2) implementation of a new front-end patient triage and assessment process; (3) increased doctor and nurse staffing; and (4) dissemination of data updates to reinforce awareness and adherence to workflow. Our process outcomes were arrival-to-provider time and LOS for low-acuity patients. Our balancing measures were the rate of return to the ED within 72 hours and arrival to provider times for high-acuity patients. We used statistical process control methodology to measure the effects of our interventions over time. We performed a secondary analysis to measure the response of wait times to total daily volume comparing preintervention to postintervention. RESULTS: We decreased the LOS by 11 minutes (9%) and arrival to MD times 21 minutes (35%) for the same period 1 year apart.

Kinetic therapy improves oxygenation in critically ill pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in oxygenation after manual turning and percussion (standard therapy) and after automated rotation and percussion (kinetic therapy). DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. SETTING: General and cardiac pediatric intensive care units. PATIENTS: Intubated and mechanically ventilated pediatric patients who had an arterial catheter and no contraindications to using a PediDyne bed. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were placed on a PediDyne bed (Kinetic Concepts) and received 18 hrs blocks of standard and kinetic therapy in an order determined by randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial blood gases were measured every 2 hrs during each phase of therapy. Oxygenation index and arterial-alveolar oxygen tension difference [P(A-a)O(2)] were calculated. Indexes calculated at baseline and after each 18-hr phase of therapy were analyzed. Fifty patients were enrolled. Data from 15 patients were either not collected or not used due to reasons that included violation of protocol and inability to tolerate the therapies in the study. Indexes of oxygenation were not normally distributed and were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank testing. Both therapies led to improvements in oxygenation, but only those from kinetic therapy achieved statistical significance. In patients receiving kinetic therapy first, median oxygenation index decreased from 7.4 to 6.19 (p = .015). The median P(A-a)O(2) decreased from 165.2 to 126.4 (p = .023). There were continued improvements in oxygenation after the subsequent period of standard therapy, with the median oxygenation index decreasing to 5.52 and median P(A-a)O(2) decreasing to 116.0, but these changes were not significant (p = .365 and .121, respectively). When standard therapy was first, the median oxygenation index decreased from 8.83 to 8.71 and the median P(a-a)o(2) decreased from 195.4 to 186.6. Neither change was significant. Median oxygenation index after the subsequent period of kinetic therapy was significantly lower (7.91, p = .044) and median P(A-a)O(2) trended lower (143.4, p = .077). CONCLUSIONS: Kinetic therapy is more efficient than standard therapy at improving oxygenation and produces improvements in oxygenation that are more persistent.

On the trail of community-acquired pneumonia. Recognize the early signs of this respiratory infection to pinpoint effective treatment plan.

Learn the significance of prompt identification, treatment, and education of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.