Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anal Chim Acta ; 1301: 342468, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553125

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acetone, isoprene, and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath have been shown to be biomarkers for many medical conditions. Researchers use different techniques for VOC detection, including solid phase microextraction (SPME), to preconcentrate volatile analytes prior to instrumental analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). These techniques include a previously developed method to detect VOCs in breath directly using SPME, but it is uncommon for studies to quantify exhaled volatiles because it can be time consuming due to the need of many external/internal standards, and there is no standardized or widely accepted method. The objective of this study was to develop an accessible method to quantify acetone and isoprene in breath by SPME GC-MS. RESULTS: A system was developed to mimic human exhalation and expose VOCs to a SPME fiber in the gas phase at known concentrations. VOCs were bubbled/diluted with dry air at a fixed flow rate, duration, and volume that was comparable to a previously developed breath sampling method. Identification of acetone and isoprene through GC-MS was verified using standards and observing overlaps in chromatographic retention/mass spectral fragmentation. Calibration curves were developed for these two analytes, which showed a high degree of linear correlation. Acetone and isoprene displayed limits of detection/quantification equal to 12 ppb/37 ppb and 73 ppb/222 ppb respectively. Quantification results in healthy breath samples (n = 15) showed acetone concentrations spanned between 71 ppb and 294 ppb, and isoprene varied between 170 ppb and 990 ppb. Both concentration ranges for acetone and isoprene in this study overlap with those reported in existing literature. SIGNIFICANCE: Results indicate the development of a system to quantify acetone and isoprene in breath that can be adapted to diverse sampling methods and instrumental analyses beyond SPME GC-MS.


Subject(s)
Butadienes , Hemiterpenes , Solid Phase Microextraction , Volatile Organic Compounds , Humans , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Acetone/analysis , Exhalation , Breath Tests/methods , Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis
2.
Molecules ; 28(11)2023 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37299010

ABSTRACT

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are byproducts from metabolic pathways that can be detected in exhaled breath and have been reported as biomarkers for different diseases. The gold standard for analysis is gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which can be coupled with various sampling methods. The current study aims to develop and compare different methods for sampling and preconcentrating VOCs using solid-phase microextraction (SPME). An in-house sampling method, direct-breath SPME (DB-SPME), was developed to directly extract VOCs from breath using a SPME fiber. The method was optimized by exploring different SPME types, the overall exhalation volume, and breath fractionation. DB-SPME was quantitatively compared to two alternative methods involving the collection of breath in a Tedlar bag. In one method, VOCs were directly extracted from the Tedlar bag (Tedlar-SPME) and in the other, the VOCs were cryothermally transferred from the Tedlar bag to a headspace vial (cryotransfer). The methods were verified and quantitatively compared using breath samples (n = 15 for each method respectively) analyzed by GC-MS quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) for compounds including but not limited to acetone, isoprene, toluene, limonene, and pinene. The cryotransfer method was the most sensitive, demonstrating the strongest signal for the majority of the VOCs detected in the exhaled breath samples. However, VOCs with low molecular weights, including acetone and isoprene, were detected with the highest sensitivity using the Tedlar-SPME. On the other hand, the DB-SPME was less sensitive, although it was rapid and had the lowest background GC-MS signal. Overall, the three breath-sampling methods can detect a wide variety of VOCs in breath. The cryotransfer method may be optimal when collecting a large number of samples using Tedlar bags, as it allows the long-term storage of VOCs at low temperatures (-80 °C), while Tedlar-SPME may be more effective when targeting relatively small VOCs. The DB-SPME method may be the most efficient when more immediate analyses and results are required.


Subject(s)
Volatile Organic Compounds , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis , Acetone/analysis , Solid Phase Microextraction , Polyethylene Terephthalates/analysis , Breath Tests/methods , Biopsy
3.
J Chromatogr A ; 1685: 463606, 2022 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36370629

ABSTRACT

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are biomarkers of disease, which can be utilized for accurate diagnostics. The gold standard for VOC identification is gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) as it allows for structure elucidation and quantification. Headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) is often used in biomarker discovery due to its ability to preconcentrate VOCs prior to GC-MS analysis. However, HS-SPME GC-MS is time-consuming, expensive and requires trained personnel. Gas sensor arrays can detect VOC biomarkers at a point-of-care and therefore are more suitable for disease diagnostics in the clinic. Nevertheless, qualification and optimization of sensing layers is tedious as each VOC of interest needs to be tested individually. Therefore, using SPME fibers to extract VOCs and GC-MS to quantitate the analytes may be an efficient strategy with high throughput to tune sensing layers and increase analyte affinity. To investigate this, suspensions of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyvinylidene fluoride-carbon black (PVDF-CB) fabricated at varying concentration were immobilized on SPME fibers through physical deposition, used to extract urinary VOCs and were subject to GC-MS analysis. The addition of CB shows increased fiber performance in terms of total integrated signal and sensitivity toward individual VOCs. PVDF-CB fibers were compared to a commercial polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) SPME fiber run using the same method. The PVDF-CB fiber outperformed the commercial fiber in detecting numerous urinary VOCs of interest. Results of this study show not only that custom SPME fiber performance can be evaluated through GC-MS analysis, but the capability of custom fibers to adsorb urinary VOCs can be tuned based on properties of interest. Hence, this method may be utilized as an analytical tool to characterize and tune gas sensing layers with high analytical throughput.


Subject(s)
Solid Phase Microextraction , Volatile Organic Compounds , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis , Soot , Dietary Fiber/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...