ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To ensure outpatient midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic, digital midwifery services were enabled for the first time in Germany in March 2020. The aim of the survey "Digital midwifery care in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic" was to conduct an initial evaluation of the newly introduced digital services from the perspective of the midwives and the users. This publication presents the results of the mothers' survey. METHOD: In February and March 2021, a cross-sectional study with an online survey was conducted. Women insured with BARMER who gave birth to a healthy child between May and November 2020 were surveyed anonymously throughout Germany using an exploratively developed online questionnaire on the utilization, satisfaction, and potential of digital midwifery care in pregnancy and the postpartum period. RESULTS: Feedback was provided by 1821 mothers. Around one third of the responding women had used digital midwifery services during pregnancy and/or the postpartum period and rated these services positively by over 80%. From the respondents' point of view, courses and counselling are very well suited whereas postpartum care often requires the midwife's presence. Advantages were seen in infection control and in saving time and travel. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has become a catalyst for digitalization in midwifery care. The digital services were quickly implemented by freelance midwives and well accepted by women and can usefully complement the care provided in the presence of the midwife. The opportunity to utilize and further develop these offers should be taken.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Midwifery , Pregnancy , Child , Female , Humans , Midwifery/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Germany , MothersABSTRACT
The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the two boost subgroups, IORT or IMRT, in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cosmesis, and acute and late toxicity. It shall be shown whether and which of the boost techniques offers better results with respect to the facial points, since there are already many studies on applying boost to the tumor bed after/during breast conserving surgery, and there are few which compare the different techniques. For this comparison, two subgroups of 76 patients each (n = 152), treated between 2002 and 2015, were enrolled in the study. In one subgroup, the 9 Gy boost was intraoperatively administered after complete removal of the primary tumor, while the other subgroup received the boost of 8.4 Gy percutaneously and simultaneously integrated into the tumor bed after breast conserving surgery. Both subgroups have subsequently undergone whole breast irradiation (WBI) of 50.4/50 Gy in 1.8−2 Gy per fraction. OS and the incidence of late toxicity did not differ between the two subgroups and no risk factor was found regarding PFS. Acute toxicities initially occurred significantly less (p < 0.001) in the IORT subgroup; however, after WBI took place, this difference vanished. Therefore, boost application by means of IORT or IMRT can be considered equivalent.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Digital midwifery services were enabled for the first time in Germany from March 2020 to ensure outpatient midwifery care in times of COVID-19. METHODS: In February and March 2021, a cross-sectional study with an online survey of midwives and mothers was conducted to find out to what extent digital services were offered by the midwives and used by the women, and to obtain information about the level of satisfaction and potential of digital midwifery care in pregnancy and post partum. RESULTS: 1821 mothers of 18,784 women, who had given birth between May and November 2020 and were asked to participate in the survey, provided feedback (response rate: 9,7%). 1551 midwives responded to the call to participate in the survey and completed the questionnaire. Around one third of the responding mothers had used digital midwifery services in pregnancy and/or the postpartum period and rated these services positively by over 80%. Half of the responding midwives offered digital services and wished to continue this care option. However, not all services were considered equally suitable for digital implementation. From the respondents' point of view, classes and counselling are very well suited whereas postpartum care often requires the midwife's presence. Mothers and midwives alike saw the advantages in COVID-19 infection control and in saving time and travel. The main challenges were seen in handling IT equipment and providing high quality care despite the lack of physical examination and direct assessment of clinical findings. The mothers wished for more interactivity and networking with each other. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has become a catalyst for digitalisation in midwifery care in Germany. The digital services were, mostly, well accepted and seen to usefully complement the in-person care of midwives. IT-support, guidelines and quality standards could help to optimise the digital services.
